Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Fox

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23
256
Update to 0.4.10 Complete.

Votes required to continue producing blocks. 

257
Compile in progress...
DONE

258
General Discussion / Re: insufficient depth ?
« on: August 29, 2014, 09:26:54 pm »
... we just identified a potential bug and thought it would be better to halt trading than allow the market to do bad things.  Trading will remain suspended until all parties have a stable wallet and we have resolved some known issues.

Will this bug require a hard fork upgrade for delegates?

259
Compile @ 74%

Complete.  First block running 0.4.9: 335859
Just a bump to the above notice as I was purged.  My 0.4.9 node is awaiting votes to resume block production.

Thanks,
Fox

260
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD is not an interest bearing bond.
« on: August 28, 2014, 05:53:57 pm »
I think implementing the price feed will stabilize the price at $1 pretty quickly as long as it is done reasonably soon. 
I appreciate the necessity to maintain an accurate peg, both quickly and to term.  I am failing to make the connection between the influence the price feed has on the creation/issuance of the bond you reference. 
-Respectfully

261
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD is not an interest bearing bond.
« on: August 28, 2014, 05:44:23 pm »
@Agent86
Does the current discrepancy in the peg (purported to be ~5-15%) represent anything beyond bitUSD market risk?  Are you proposing to convert this risk into a new bond instrument (perhaps bitUSDbond) to stabilize the peg?  How does (re)implementing a bitUSD price feed impact the bond instrument pricing movement over time?

262
General Discussion / Re: Litecoin Sharedrop Fork
« on: August 28, 2014, 04:23:15 pm »
I'm really asking about notion of transfer of incumbency value.
@charleshoskinson
In what direction do you see the incumbency value transferring between PTS/AGS <--> LTC at a specific ratio?  Perhaps three: 50/50, higher and lower.  Bistshares is the incumbent for DPOS technology and LTC is incumbent for altcoin.

How does a given sharedrop scenario benefit PTS/AGS holders more than a direct value transfer of LTC into BTSX through the open market?

263
General Discussion / Re: KEEP CALM and Read this Thread
« on: August 28, 2014, 02:19:14 pm »
Let me quickly highlight the important words:
In other words, you funds are safe because your private keys are safe and eventually all bugs will be worked out.
+5%

Keep your head down and tow the line toward innovation.  We all make this work together.

264
Compile @ 74%

Complete.  First block running 0.4.9: 335859

265
Upgrade complete.

First block produced using 0.4.8: 317147

266
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 17: Teenage Mutant Ninja Blockchains
« on: August 20, 2014, 10:48:52 pm »
how glad to see this news when I just wake up, thank you very much. ;D

Well earned. Great work!

267
Who is running delegate commonwealth? This guy has been offline for more than one week, but BM doesn't vote it down...
+5%

268
General Discussion / Re: Proposal: Max Delegate Pay = Approval Rate
« on: August 20, 2014, 06:48:36 pm »
I think there needs to be a weighting to high reliability. Because 95% reliability is terrible, but the payout isn't much different from having 99.99% reliability (only a 5% difference), so the incentive isn't there to get high reliability. On the other hand, if you make 95% or below = 10%, and 96% = +20%, 97% = +40%, 98% = +60%, 99%=+80%, 99.9% = +100%, this should put the incentive in the right place.

Discussion earlier in this thread include expanding the delegate slate and payout beyond the current 101, perhaps to 150.  Standby delegates #102+ may not have a valid non-zero reliability rate, which may impact payout calculations offered above. 

Current approval rates for delegate #102 drop rapidly from ~6% to ~0.6% for delegate 150.  Interestingly, the sum of approval rate for this lot is ~101% or on average a 1% subsidy per active delegate to support the standby delegates.

I feel expanding the payout delegate pool beyond 101 has merit, as having a node up to date and ready to produce blocks for the network provides value if called upon. 


269
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 16 - Armageddon ($5000 Bounty inside)
« on: August 20, 2014, 11:12:57 am »
fund please
Sent 1% of your request for testing. 

270
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 16 - Armageddon ($5000 Bounty inside)
« on: August 20, 2014, 05:16:12 am »
What are the major differences between /bitshares_toolkit Dry Run 16 and /bitsharesx 0.4.4?

I set my feed in Dry Run 16.  I'm ready on main net as well.  Just need a few more votes to move my delegate up from position #102. 


Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23