Quote from: Giga on January 14, 2014, 06:53:24 pm

Domsch, how soon are you looking into deploying the exchange. Time is against us so I would assume an accelerated deployment process is part of the plan?

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

That is our plan. But usually plans never work out, so we need to improvise. I will try and get development started asap while working on the banking/licensing problem. But there is no set ETD right now.

Quote from: Giga on January 14, 2014, 06:53:24 pm

Domsch, how soon are you looking into deploying the exchange. Time is against us so I would assume an accelerated deployment process is part of the plan?

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

That is our plan. But usually plans never work out, so we need to improvise. I will try and get development started asap while working on the banking/licensing problem. But there is no set ETD right now.

I agree on a couple of points.

1> Marketing sucks. I have been involved with FTC and especially WDC from the beginning, and the marketing they did was amazing, especially considering it was done by volunteers. In contrast the marketing here is terrible; even more so when you consider that actual money is being paid. Its so bad that I actually thought this might be a deliberate ploy to keep the value down and grab some cheap PTS/AGS.

2> PTS got the raw deal wrt AGS. I can understand why it would be so though, considering AGS is fully I3 profit while PTS is not. With the new license, 3rd party DACs which use the code (which they will unless they try to reinvent the wheel) will honour both AGS and PTS so there is good argument to change AGS to PTS. I guess PTS will end up as 1.2 PTS = 1 AGS.

Would be nice if there were more updates. Bytemater is doing some good work which he can see in the Bitshare thread. If there is an weekly update which shows how much other stuff are being done that will be very nice.

Would be nice to have bought a bit more back then!