Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AdamBLevine

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 33
136
My blockchain is updated, but "import wallet" is not a valid option and putting the wallet.dat files in the normal appdata/roaming didnt do anything. 

Am I missing something?

137
General Discussion / Re: TITAN - how it works
« on: July 12, 2014, 02:29:43 am »
I'll check back for the most recent update in a week.

138
General Discussion / Re: TITAN - how it works
« on: July 12, 2014, 01:53:20 am »
Very nice!  Can we use this for the album art on Daniel's upcoming episode?

139
General Discussion / Re: Initial price for a XTS
« on: July 10, 2014, 03:49:26 pm »
Anybody checked Bter and BTC38 recently? Even their IOUs in BTSX are trading with a market cap of $20-25 million. This sucker's going to debut much higher than some folks think.

The IOUs are the only way to get BTSX right now. The supply is very limited at the moment. Once actual BTSX floods the market it will go down, just like ANY other IPO that debuts on an exchange. Then it should resume its course higher, given no major setbacks. I think there will be opportunities to get in on the cheap once more after we go live.

I really hope so...

We'll see. I've been buying some small quantities at around 0.008BTC at BTC38, but if the price drops even further on launch I'll be ready to buy even more. If BM and the others can sort out the few remaining bugs, the current state of this project is miles ahead of most other "altcoins", which bodes well for the Bitshares ecosystem.

I won't be surprised it BTSX is in the nr. 2 spot on Coinmarketcap come Christmas.



There are going to be 4 billion bitshares available on the market all at once, and you're paying .008btc EACH?  That's what, $4.80 a piece, and would give a market cap of  $19,200,000,000 i.e. bigger than the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem including bitcoin.

Are you aware of how much you're likely overpaying?
Wow this is  just FUD Adam. You like that don't you ? Ohh that because you don't have the time to read the forum right..  now I remember. That is  a good excuse so you can say anything you like.

Are you blaming me for being confused, when this is pretty clearly confusing?  I've been following and supporting the project Since august of last year, and I don't even know how many tokens there are going to be.

Am I stupid, a bad actor, or is it confusing?

140
General Discussion / Re: Initial price for a XTS
« on: July 10, 2014, 02:44:37 pm »
Anybody checked Bter and BTC38 recently? Even their IOUs in BTSX are trading with a market cap of $20-25 million. This sucker's going to debut much higher than some folks think.

The IOUs are the only way to get BTSX right now. The supply is very limited at the moment. Once actual BTSX floods the market it will go down, just like ANY other IPO that debuts on an exchange. Then it should resume its course higher, given no major setbacks. I think there will be opportunities to get in on the cheap once more after we go live.

I really hope so...

We'll see. I've been buying some small quantities at around 0.008BTC at BTC38, but if the price drops even further on launch I'll be ready to buy even more. If BM and the others can sort out the few remaining bugs, the current state of this project is miles ahead of most other "altcoins", which bodes well for the Bitshares ecosystem.

I won't be surprised it BTSX is in the nr. 2 spot on Coinmarketcap come Christmas.



There are going to be 4 billion bitshares available on the market all at once, and you're paying .008btc EACH?  That's what, $4.80 a piece, and would give a market cap of  $19,200,000,000 i.e. bigger than the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem including bitcoin.

Are you aware of how much you're likely overpaying?

141
General Discussion / Re: List of BitAssets to pre-register
« on: July 07, 2014, 11:41:07 pm »
Isn't it very easy to fake market depth?

How? If you put in "fake" bids/asks they can still get matched, and if you cancel them then the "fake" market depth is no longer there and trading stops

If you are talking about a small or new asset, what is to stop me from creating it then populating the exchange with orders that I both buy and sell with various idents?   Those trades would really happen, and my only cost would be the tx fees.  At the point the market bootstraps, I win! my asset is trading at the expense of others.  If I fail what did it cost me besides the tx fees?

142
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Tatiana Coin
« on: July 07, 2014, 11:37:42 pm »
If you need to get in touch with me, please email me adam@letstalkbitcoin.com

I don't spend much time here so if you have something pressing, that's the way to do it.

Regarding your XCP, please submit the details on the coinpowers contact page.

http://coinpowers.com/contact.aspx

I'm not involved in the day to day operations so I'm not sure what you should do.  Amos (at that contact) will know.

143
KeyID / Re: .p2p auction parameter discussion
« on: July 03, 2014, 02:40:11 am »
Yes, like a trapped investor turned troll.  You guys have created a bunch of potential that, so it seems like a plausible concern.

144
KeyID / Re: .p2p auction parameter discussion
« on: July 02, 2014, 09:47:14 pm »
Yes.

If I spent $10,000 supporting invictus very early and that results in 10,000,000 domainshares for me, is it really so painful to spend 1000 each on 1000 promising domains ASAP?   Really the only one who can stop me is someone else who also bought in at cheap cheap prices because my actions do not make economic sense to someone coming in at this later point when the multiplier is so much worse.

I *love* this system, i'm just saying be real

145
KeyID / Re: .p2p auction parameter discussion
« on: July 02, 2014, 09:26:29 pm »
Ok so let's use that analogy on the other extreme:

I pay $100 per year to list my personal webpage with a few download links to some crypto tools I built. A few days before my lease expires someone bids $200, I'm on vacation and they get it. Replace my download links with versions that steal everyone's keys.

So now what, we have to add some logic where when someone makes a bid above you there's some minimum time you get to re-bid before you actually lose the name? I guess that's not so bad, I just have to somehow notify all my users that my site is about to get compromised.

The more concerning scenario, actually almost identical to the one you said but formulated in a way that doesn't sound irrational: Big Corp sees that my site with its new brand is quickly gaining popularity, says to pay them $10k per month or else they'll buy my name for that much because it's worth it for them to not have competition grow even if it is not possible to monetize the users for that much. This also coincidentally happens near the end of my lease, because hey it takes about a year to build up a good brand.



@adam I imagine everyone will always be using $ value to judge and so I don't think initial supply or price per share matters at all. Let's just pretend we're using USD for these, all the points made by everyone else are still valid.

Toast, isn't the current strategy going to result in a lot of people having tens of millions of Domainshares each?   You can reckon it in whatever currency you want but if you are talking about relative prices, it seems safe to say an attacker can greatly amplify their attack by supporting invictus early and securing an overlarge share relative to your anticipated value of them for purposes like dns auction.

146
General Discussion / Re: Have we set the blockchain speed record?
« on: July 02, 2014, 07:34:40 pm »
Ripple:
Quote
Right now, consensus consistently takes about 2 seconds (which is the minimum). In simulations, the consensus process increases with the log of the number of trusted validators. 100 validators brings it to about 3 seconds. 1,000 validators increases it to about 4 seconds. 10,000 increases it to about 5 seconds.

Based upon the latency we see in our network right now we *could* tune up the block production rate to handle 101 validators at 2 seconds.   This would give complete confirmation in less than 102 seconds (51% of delegates signing).   

I don't think there is much advantage to a 2 second vs 15 second block... but I am fairly certain that DPOS has proven it could scale better than Ripple.

Daniel, please reconsider your thread titles. 

To answer your question: No, you haven't set any records - you are wondering out loud if you could do that, but you have not even attempted it.   

Please reconsider your thread titles, they lead to elevated expectations that are rarely met.

147
General Discussion / Re: Behind the Scenes with BitShares Video
« on: July 02, 2014, 06:25:44 pm »
It seems trivially simple to say

"We're working on Bitshares, which does for business what Bitcoin does for money - We're making tools that empower people to build profitable, decentralized global businesses and giving them away for free."

148
KeyID / Re: .p2p auction parameter discussion
« on: July 02, 2014, 04:36:35 pm »
After a talk with BM just now:


* You get back exactly what you put in, no kickbacks.
* Delegates set the number of auctions that are allowed to close in a given time to prevent domains that didn't get attention from getting sold off.
* Global, fixed renewal rate set by delegates.


@Agent86 I still do not see how you can't imagine someone with more money than you wanting to buy your name and doing something malicious with it. I would *never* rent a domain if I expect it to be possible for some rich guy I piss off to snipe it out from under me.

Quote
First thing I do when this releases (if I don't just sell my shares) is buy every halfway reasonable sounding domain I can and promise never to sell them in hopes you guys start to "get it"

Really? You're going to sink $20,000 on a few hundred domains and not sell them for a profit?

I think his point is that it's not 20k if he starts out with a bunch of domainshares since he has an investment in bitshares and the supply just went to 2 billion, so we're all going to be rich rich rich! 

and thus it's not really 20k.  It might be the opportunity cost of having spent them as 20k, but the base cost will be a fraction of a fraction of that.

Or am I missing something?

149
General Discussion / Re: Initial price for a XTS
« on: July 02, 2014, 04:30:16 pm »
Right, but the way many of the larger indexes calculate are based on total market cap as represented by (current price) x (total available supply).

I'm not talking about any actual change, i'm asking if this change was made to maximize placement on market cap coin leaderboards?

All coins will be available from the beginning, so nothing to do with marketcap.

http://coinmarketcap.com/
Look at NXT vs DRK

150
General Discussion / Re: Behind the Scenes with BitShares Video
« on: July 02, 2014, 04:26:14 pm »
Has a public television vibe to it which I like.  Good initiative making it happen.

Two critiques

1 - You are an invictus employee, right?  Your intro just seems odd to me.

Quote
This is brian and today i’m meeting with the bitshares development team, this takes me to blacksburg, a small town in the foothills of western virginia

Why say your name, or why act like you're an outsider?  I'm confused

2 - Nobody ever actually talks about the product beyond saying their broad project name.  The second quote from Nikolai was painful, I've transcribed it.

Quote
I think that there is a lot of innovation happening with our team that people don’t realize.  People are really excited about nxt or uh ethereum... but uh we have some pretty pretty cool technical achievements that um... once we have one or two blockchains out people will really start appreciating them.

This video felt like a little bit of "meet the team" and a lot of "we're so happy we're working on this project, and we're really getting close"

so if the target audience is the forums, I think you've nailed it.  For someone who does not know what bitshares is, this seems really out of context.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 33