Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - speedy

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 78
256
Here is my question for next week's hangout:

According to bts blocks, we have 37 100% delegates resulting in inflation of 2.38% == 60 million BTS / year, or 164000 BTS / day.

My question is how can the increased fees earned in BTS 2.0 cover that daily deficit?

We currently average 600 BTS / day in fees. So we need to either fire some delegates or increase our daily earned fees x273.

While last week's philosophical discussion on the creation of money was interesting, is that really what we want to hear about? Everyone here already knows the current financial system is broken, but we arent going to "Replace the dollar" (33:05) if BitShares keeps expanding its money supply.

257
Random Discussion / Re: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
« on: August 09, 2015, 01:53:34 am »
Why are they talking about 6000 confirmations for one transaction?

258
General Discussion / Re: London meetup
« on: August 08, 2015, 09:14:13 pm »
Yeah I couldnt make it this time ??? Ill come to the next one!

259
Technical Support / Re: Will bitassets in 2.0 Still Earn Interest?
« on: August 08, 2015, 03:31:03 pm »
With bitshares 2.0. If some wanted to create a new bitasset and they wanted it to earn interest, could they still do that?

As I understand it yes, but you need to loan it out on the bond market.

260
General Discussion / Re: The business model for Hosted Wallet Provider
« on: August 08, 2015, 09:50:59 am »
Stan, do you not worry that by licensing the software and retaining direct ownership of it you have a greater likelihood of coming under regulatory pressure, like Ripple did when they were asked to modify their network to add KYC checks into it? Its a lot easier to argue that the community is in control of what goes into BitShares if all its software is GPL.

261
General Discussion / Re: BTS transaction volume vs Litecoin
« on: August 05, 2015, 10:36:00 pm »
Does banx have 2000 transactions per day?

Good question - I was speaking optimistically/out my arse. Doesnt seem too high a figure for a small exchange.

262
General Discussion / BTS transaction volume vs Litecoin
« on: August 05, 2015, 10:21:58 pm »
Litecoin averages about 4000 transactions per day:
http://www.coindesk.com/data/litecoin-daily-transactions/

For BTS its a bit more complicated, you have to turn off delegate feed updates. I dont think they are an accurate measure of adoption as they are continuous and from users that are payed from inflation.

BTS Tranfers = ~200
Asset transactions = ~250
http://bitsharesblocks.com/charts/transactions

So we average about 500 transactions/day compared to Litecoin's 4000.

Speculation:
-Easily double to 1000/day when the bond market arrives. Loads of users will want to earn interest by lending.
-Faster 2.0 wallet will double us again to 2000/day.
-Banx integrates into BitShares and trades UIAs - double to 4000.
-Then we will be as established as Litecoin - a great first step!

263
General Discussion / Re: Economic Arguments against POS/DPOS
« on: August 05, 2015, 08:37:09 am »
I agree its a waste of time.

Like Bytemaster says, there are mind viruses that convince you that mining is good.

Mining has a couple of qualities which DPOS does not:

* Anyone can get into the coin simply by turning on their miners (at least initially)
* There is a constant revenue stream of electricity getting turned into coins

Yes the only argument for it is that it can be a useful & fair initial method of distrubution. We already did that with Protoshares.

264
General Discussion / Re: Economic Arguments against POS/DPOS
« on: August 05, 2015, 12:21:27 am »
I agree its a waste of time.

Like Bytemaster says, there are mind viruses that convince you that mining is good.

265
General Discussion / Re: Noob Question: Revenue from DACs?
« on: August 03, 2015, 03:56:53 pm »
The "return" you get on your BitShares is the deflationary effect that BTS has from charging transaction fees. Right now BitShares is still unprofitable - it doesnt have enough users and its inflating at 2% to pay for developers.

Hopefully 2.0 will make it easier to bring in more users and charge more fees to cover BitShares' costs.

So there are currently zero DACs in existence that are making a profit.

266
General Discussion / Re: another newbie lost bts wallet again!!!
« on: August 02, 2015, 10:33:53 am »
Who relies on someone else to "autobackup" (didnt know that was a thing) their wallet?

Create backups on multiple usb sticks. You only have a backup on your C: drive?

Also I really should create a backup on CD to deal with the possibility of an EMP pulse.

267
General Discussion / Re: Lets here who the bank is already
« on: July 29, 2015, 04:06:27 pm »
There was no such thing.

268
General Discussion / Re: Lets here who the bank is already
« on: July 29, 2015, 03:27:02 pm »
Unless we generate a constant stream of positive news, there is zero reason for anyone to hold BitShares. They will just move onto the next thing.

269
General Discussion / Lets here who the bank is already
« on: July 29, 2015, 08:55:18 am »
A couple of mumbles ago, BM mentioned that a "major bank" is interested in working with us. The price right now is so pathetically low that they should already have done all the front-running they need. Why would there be a problem in disclosing who the bank is? It should be the next Summer announcement.

We need something to steal Ethereum's thunder, which apparently is launching today.

Is that bank just interested in licensing Graphene for a private blockchain, like so many banks seem to want to do these days?

270
Meta / Re: Where's the HTTPS certificate gone?
« on: July 27, 2015, 08:56:08 pm »
Cnx is NOT hosting this forum and has nothing to do with it

I know, it was an attempt at humor.

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 78