Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - legendface66

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
31
Of course I'm in too. I'll use AWS or similar service in a region that makes sense and ultimately organise a dedicated server.

32
Beyond Bitcoin [closed] / Re: Beyond Bitcoin 1
« on: June 01, 2014, 04:37:43 am »
Thanks guys! The next one is killer!
I need to interview Stephen Reid asap too

33
Beyond Bitcoin [closed] / Re: A bit of a change . . .
« on: May 23, 2014, 05:35:56 am »
Well for the benefit of those who may read this at a later date -  the LTB Network is a publishing platform. It's a great soap box to stand on. And like most good soap boxes, it doesn't do the talking.

Beyond Bitcoin is and always will be by every conceivable definition of the word, Independent.

There.


34
Beyond Bitcoin [closed] / Re: A bit of a change . . .
« on: May 22, 2014, 08:07:25 pm »
I think the idea here Gamey is to contribute to a common resource - the LTB Network. Fans of every show can be exposed to all other content there. I joined so that Listeners of MMM and S&S could be exposed to my work too. Together we bring value to the network and that will reflected in the LTBC token experiment. The LTBN is an experiment in decentralized communities, not centralised ones. Remember also that A)this is opt in, and B) centralisation always refers to either influence or exposure. Neither Adam nor anyone else exerts influence over the content (apart from the request that it be clean) creation is decentralised. And the centralised exposure is a good thing. that's why I chose to opt in.

And while BB germinated here it's stated goal is to be a common ground for all communities. Not just Bitshares. We already know each other - what good would that do?

As for corruption. All primary resources - hangouts, interviews etc are posted on the BBS site. At worst, the podcast on the network is an advertisement for the real meat. Though I'd like to give myself a bit more credit than that :-)

35
Beyond Bitcoin [closed] / Re: A bit of a change . . .
« on: May 22, 2014, 09:47:07 am »

Hi guys, so, first up, thanks to fuz for the emails!

The podcast is itself an RSS feed of links to audio files. So mixing the content up confuses the issue. Now the two content types are separated - processed content goes to LTB as weekly BB podcast and the primary resourses go to BBH. This includes the hangouts and light edits of interviews.

Second, there is no necessary relationship between LTB and the content on the site - It's just a blog site. BB is perfectly independent. Anything you hear in the podcasts, the authors put there. I'm a big appreciator of them but I agree that there is a gaping hole where technical content could fit.

The only way to get other communities involved - and we need communities, not just speaking devs - is to get involved with them, learn about their projects, answer questions on their boards. If we push our agenda too much we risk alienating folks. The first order of business has to be to make friends and understand the angles. This is community building and we have all the tools, skills and know how we need. The different approaches to answering the 2.0 question are sometimes philosophical and sometimes target market driven but each is experiencing success because it appeals to a value set and view of the future. For this reason they will all continue to experience success - there is simply more than one way to skin the proverbial cat.

that's my bit. I have some editing to do but one final thing we need is a web developer. We need some groovy juice to help with curating what may quickly turn into a large amount of archive content, a separate module for a project news blog on the front page (I can do this actually I guess) and there has to be some cool stuff we're not thinking of that a UX dev could dream up. Stuff to think about anyway while we peruse the WWW of crypto

catchya later guys, keep it cranking

36
Beyond Bitcoin [closed] / A bit of a change . . .
« on: May 20, 2014, 11:25:24 am »
This project has been steadily evolving as fuz and I have worked on it and it's reached a point where a major shift needs to take place, rather than the incremental ones we've been making.

Things have been quiet for a while because I've been repackaging Beyond Bitcoin into two different podcasts:

Beyond Bitcoin on the LTB Network: this is a new, radio show style podcast.

Beyond Bitcoin: Hangouts : this will be lightly edited releases of the mumble hangouts.

I just can't have the podcast I would like to make and the hangouts published in the same feed without severely compromising one or the other. The mumble hangouts are supposed to be a primary resource. To turn them into a "Marketable" podcast requires too much editing. Joining the LTB Network with a show will bring attention and hopefully more devs to the mumble server.

Tell me what you think of the change, I'd be more verbose but I'm getting a twitch from so much time staring at this screen. Talk to you guys later :-)

37
Beyond Bitcoin [closed] / Re: Incremental progress on the website
« on: May 20, 2014, 11:13:02 am »
Thanks guys, I've been super busy and the website did the job so I stopped working on it for the time being. It's in Joomla. It's ok, I'm a hopless web dev though so things move slow haha

38
Beyond Bitcoin [closed] / Incremental progress on the website
« on: May 12, 2014, 06:02:06 am »
I've been chipping away at the website - www.beyondbitcoinshow.com - c/o the Fuzz so things got a bit quiet recently. The feed back is great to hear and the community support is fantastic. fuznuts has indeed been doing a great job of organising and moderating discussion and I m sure he'll continue to bring his energy and good humour to bear.

Thanks are in order for Toast and Bytemaster both for being accommodating, helpful, and well, just top blokes.

Also Micheal Dean for his advice and assistance.

All comments and suggestions influence this project in some way so by all means be vocal. My email address is arthur.falls@gmail.com. I'm always interested in ideas and always looking for people to interview. The plan from my end is to get people with something to say heard. Whether that be in the form of a highly directional, well structured interview, or a rambling stroll through a field of ideas. It's all good (but I favour the latter).


The feedback thus far has been just what I could have hoped for. Expect a steady flow of content and improving quality over time also.

Stay greasy guys

39
General Discussion / Re: DPOS chain based ratings and reputation
« on: May 12, 2014, 05:08:15 am »
No I disagree... you could have a public DB of both signature dependency information and "receipts" that are "signed" (stamped?) by DACs AND all sorts of hierarchical key inference trickery. It doesn't need to be a DAC but it would effectively leech-mines many other DACs.
I am not sure about the long-term plans for keyhotee but from what I understand it doesn't lay a good enough foundation to be able to quantify trust and thus have effective credit DACs

That's unfortunate, I had envisioned Keyhotee as, in part, a reputation platform that may ultimately integrate an insurance history rating, credit score, ebay rating, etc. Maybe with the ability to grant limited permissions to parties concerned with specific reputation elements.

40
General Discussion / Re: Radio Interview with Toast & BitShares DNS
« on: May 11, 2014, 12:42:44 pm »
Great interview!

41
Fantastic. Thanks man. And props to fuz for making it happen. I'll put it up on www.beyondbitcoinshow.com too as an article

42
General Discussion / Re: DEADLOCH | Understanding Bitshares
« on: May 03, 2014, 03:00:04 am »
It is an excellent article, well visualised

43
Could you please post a link? I'm not sure how to get to this podcast....?

That makes a ton of sense. Here's the libsyn page:

http://beyondbitcoin.libsyn.com/

44
With any luck There'll be a couple more on there this week.

Go check it out anywhere podcasts are sold!

45
I won't be there but I'm hoping to listen later.

I'd really like to hear reputation management. This has always fascinated me and seems central to many potential DACs.


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5