If whoever is recording would like to shoot these over to me I'd be happy to edit them, I feel a bit left out as a minority time zoner

tldr: I'm happy to fit my project into whatever you're working on. Collaboration is the word of the age right?

Wow fuzznuts, It really sounds like you're on the ball. I like the idea of "beyond Bitcoin but i'm also aware that that is the name Invictus chose for their conference. This would be ideal except that I'm beginning to think that maybe instead of being Bitshares news oriented it might be more useful to the community to focus on explaining new blockchain innovations though interviews. It doesn't make sense to limit the reach of the show to Bitshares when there is so much going on that is worth including. Broader content means a broader listenership too.

With the complimentary work you're doing it does make sense to partner though and given you have chosen Beyond Bitcoin for your project then it makes sense for me to adopt the branding too. I was wondering what to do about building a website which, given my club footed coding ability, is somewhat challenging.

What do you think of starting with an episode on Proof of Stake? The evolution of Invictus' security model from mining based to DPOS is a valuable process to examine I think and showcases the benefits and drawbacks of various approaches. This will also give listeners a knowledge base for us to build on.

my internet is not much better than dial up and I'm at work till the 18th so I'm kind of participating at a distance

Sounds like there is some productive discourse in that thread. I'll draw out the conclusions and report on them ;-)

The idea is you need to mine to maintain your ID or it will vanish. The purchased founder IDs were a one-off. Due to the need for ubiquitous compatibility, I would imagine that a CPU oriented miner will be utilised. Presumably the protoshares miner was a release candidate. The recent advances in proof of stake made by by the team mean that mining based 51% will be difficult/impossible should they choose to design the chain that way. In reality though, without the profit motive of a finance or equity oriented chain it is hard to imagine someone bothering. However should a 51% attack occur, it would no be difficult for the developers to just fork back to the pre-attack chain. It's not like there is any money to double spend and all of the data is encrypted in public view.
The private keys of wallets will be kept in the chain and used to conduct transfers through the native cryptocurrency wallet software - the "coins" themselves are not located in the Keyhotee chain - just the encrypted wallets.

Keyhotee is an address book and dossier as well as a kind of multipurpose data safe. It is designed to allow the user to pass the stored data to applications securely . . .

. . . as I understand it.

Seemed like a nice guy. What can I say?

off to work. I'll check again in 2-4 hrs

still waiting on the thirty