Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - yellowecho

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 54
181
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: NOTE Price discussion
« on: April 01, 2015, 06:35:26 am »
NOTES release: yet another way for PTS bears to get some more BTS that they will be able to dump.

Also: NOTES.  Yet another thing the Bitshares community blew all their money on that wasn't Bitshares, resulting in the price of Bitshares going into a neverending bear trend.  Also see: PLAY.

lol PeerTracks has laughably more going for it than PLAY.  I'm trading NOTES because I believe it has potential to solve a lot of problems within the music industry while challenging the Spotify model IF done properly.   << So let's examine this theory briefly.  Currently Spotify has an estimated market cap of ~$4Billion.. while I believe (and correct me if I'm wrong here) NOTES have ~3.5 million based on recent trading.  That means Spotify is valued at 1,143X the value of the service NOTES and PeerTrack can offer.  My trading is calling shenanigans on that valuation.  The trade can be seen as shorting Spotify or shorting BTS but regardless there're odds I'm willing to take based purely on confidence of the Peertracks team and the underlying technology offered by BitShares,

182
General Discussion / Re: BitShares - Safer than a Swiss Bank
« on: April 01, 2015, 06:05:32 am »
This is an excellent marketing line for the masses due to western media/Hollywood hype (though most investors know Swiss banks are no longer 'safe' in the sense of being private or solvent).

"Safer than a Swiss Bank" is guaranteed to get attention, grab headlines, cause controversy etc.

But Bitshares (as mentioned previously, Bitshares 1.0 or 2.0) is the real deal and is absolutely a better place to store wealth than a Swiss bank (or most any Western bank practicing fractional reserve lending).

I think it would be great to throw this out via some careful plants in interviews, forums and a few banners once 1.0 is out and the mm bots have created some depth on the books.

To those calling Stan 'delusional' and using other derogatory language - back the sweet fuck down, please. This forum is no place for ignorance.

Everyone is getting a bit edgy as the cap is dropping and the devs have stopped babysitting the community in favour of, well, developing.

We are, presumably, all adults that have completed appropriate due diligence prior to investing a dime in this project.

If so, we all know Bitshares will succeed or fail on a 3-5 year horizon, not a 3-5 day/week/month horizon.

Devs are working their assess off and laying down code like crazy.

The seed was planted, now the roots are growing. Patience.

  ;)

183
General Discussion / Re: NXT is better than BitShares?
« on: April 01, 2015, 05:59:56 am »
NXT is what you get when you develop for an anarchist group of developers perhaps working for free or early miners.... maybe a bunch of younger people or teenagers some smart some not, contributing but in an unorganized fashion.... while Bitshares is a democratic system with developers who are voted in and consider work somewhat of a responsibility in terms of quality and execution because they were "hired"... the quality of work should shine through more and more.

With NXT you will get tons of startup projects.. less finished and even less that are quality approved for mainstream use. Their roadmap may seem more extensive but its just eye candy more than anything.

Spot on.

184
Why can't we make "money drops" a literal concept?
A delegate (or individual for UIAs) could literally "drop" bitUSD, bitEUR, bitCNY in the streets of major cities.  A geocaching-style GPS-driven augmented reality-type game could be made so if a mobile app is within proximity of "dropped" bitUSD then it would be picked up automatically.  There would literally be money in the streets.  I mean.. why wouldn't someone want to play? 

It seems totally do-able, fun, and highly marketable.  In fact, it could even be marketed as an alternative to coupons for business owners since they could drop redeemable UIAs at the doors of their establishments.  To elaborate even further, a DAC like Peertracks could utilize it for dropping ArtistCoins at a venue on a particular night. 

IMO crypto is lacking interaction with the physical world.. it doesn't feel real to people.. so why not turn that weakness into a strength?  There could literally be gold lined streets funded by a faucet and all it would require for people is a download.

 :P


185
General Discussion / Re: BitShares - Safer than a Swiss Bank
« on: April 01, 2015, 03:43:01 am »
Let's face it... banks are unfair.  So BitShare!
Why use a bank that just doesn't care when you can BitShare???

186
General Discussion / Re: How I use the bitshares wallet painlessly.
« on: April 01, 2015, 02:01:01 am »
I'm not a techie, but on MacBooks there is a command in the terminal window to prevent the laptop from sleeping, "pmset noidle". Worth looking up. Not sure about windows.

I use an app called Caffeine which essentially does the same thing without having to go into the terminal.. and it lives in the menu bar for easy access
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/caffeine/id411246225?mt=12

With that said, when my computer sleeps or turns off the blockchain syncs so quickly that it's nearly immediate.

187
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: PeerTracks website
« on: April 01, 2015, 01:25:30 am »
This is the problem:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16658900/nivo-slider-trying-to-increase-rotation-speed

The slider rotations are too slow in the pauseTime.  The source code is currently set at '11116000' which I believe is the time in milliseconds which means the pages don't turn for 185 minutes! lol  It should probably be set to ~5000 which would be 5 seconds. 

188
General Discussion / Re: How I use the bitshares wallet painlessly.
« on: April 01, 2015, 12:54:07 am »
I booster my RAM to 16GB and smooth sailing except for a recent GUI bug on the 0.8.0a update. 8)

189
General Discussion / Re: Reworking the wallet trading interface
« on: April 01, 2015, 12:26:03 am »
I really like where this is going!    Here's my brief stab at it:


190
General Discussion / Re: NXT is better than BitShares?
« on: March 31, 2015, 05:39:12 pm »
I moved here from NXT a little over a year ago. Every time I've checked back into it since then, there hasn't been anything there I've wanted to use or own. BitShares is superior in every way.

I was an early adopter of NXT on the original DGEX but sold everything and came here too.  In my experience, NXT offered a lot on the surface but the overall execution always seemed poor and unpolished.  I realize that the BitShares client has had bugs here and there but the first iteration client was far better than anything I experienced with NXT and I've been active in the internal exchange since day 1.

Exactly same situation with me. NXT in the beginning was just unhandable...I was so afraid of loosing my NXTs they way the whole thing was working so I sold everything within the first couple of weeks. I didn't have any difficulties with BTS from day 1 in handling things and never felt the same insecurity of loosing my BTS..

However...NXT clients were stabilized much faster and are stable now. BTS is far from a stable version yet. I do appreciate though that this is comparing two completely things and that's why I have moved away from NXT to BTS from the start.. But I feel that we could have done things much better and we shouldn't be where we stand today...

Agreed.  I was afraid to lose NXT as well... the interface and brain wallet just felt unsecure and amateur.  I've played with the new NXT client and it is more stable now but I'm still not attracted to their execution or community... and it seems to lack cohesion.  In fact, I think the current state of NXT is exactly where BTS would have gone if the merger hadn't happened.  And I feel you on the stability of the BTS client but most of it is in the GUI which shouldn't be a big deal and Moonstone will likely bring a lot to the table so I'm optimistic.

191
General Discussion / Re: Reworking the wallet trading interface
« on: March 31, 2015, 04:42:15 pm »
Cool thing would be if someone would just fork the webwallet and focus on traders instead of an all-rounder ...

@cass: someone using your trading interface already? The one you design back then for Brian youknowhow??

Moonstone seems like its targeting the average user so I was thinking the internal exchange would be more focused on traders.  This should probably be discussed more often.  Who is the target user for the main client?

192
Quote
-After a successful launch here in the US I will begin working to allow international orders.

Would this not give our Chinese friends direct market access to precious metals bypassing tariffs associated with the yuan? :o :o :o :o  How competitive are these prices compared to other shops for the international folk?

193
General Discussion / Re: food for thought - raising fees
« on: March 31, 2015, 04:41:21 am »
I'd say that we could easily raise fees to the equivalent of 2 or 3 cents per transaction from the current less than one cent.

And there would probably not be all that much blowback from the peanut gallery if it all went in to referral rewards.

I think raising fees is fine at this time. It's not like there is a competition to lower fees right now anyway. The competition to lower fees happens later once different competitors are mature.

Right now the competition is to get users and the potential growth is huge before fees become an issue. We could have a million users before fees become a big deal.

Just so long as it's a better deal than traditional banks.

That's true.. but it also ostracizes traders to a degree which is arguably where most volume comes at the moment.

194
General Discussion / Re: food for thought - raising fees
« on: March 31, 2015, 03:38:04 am »
I think we should be cautious here.  We don't need to do anything that would scare our shareholders or disrupt already low volumes on the internal exchange.

195
General Discussion / Re: NXT is better than BitShares?
« on: March 30, 2015, 10:03:33 pm »
I moved here from NXT a little over a year ago. Every time I've checked back into it since then, there hasn't been anything there I've wanted to use or own. BitShares is superior in every way.

I was an early adopter of NXT on the original DGEX but sold everything and came here too.  In my experience, NXT offered a lot on the surface but the overall execution always seemed poor and unpolished.  I realize that the BitShares client has had bugs here and there but the first iteration client was far better than anything I experienced with NXT and I've been active in the internal exchange since day 1.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 54