Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
If we picked any good reason
to be our favorite reason
the suspicious would still reason
there was some other reason.
...and we would be right back to this same place again.
Very true Stan, but you have failed to provide ANY reason whatsoever, leaving the community to guess your motives and purpose. clear communication at least allows your supporters to have a firm platform of facts to dispense with any contrary claims. This is what I mean by you guys not learning your lesson.
You should study the trivium and Aristotelian logic to understand this and know when you're stepping into the world of sophism.
That's not true, BM has already stated that the attempt to regrow PTS had merit. This was not possible with a single stakeholder of that size using DPOS. This is reason enough.
Sorry Ben, but nothing I said was untrue. I am not saying I'm against the decision at all. Your "assuming" what the reasons are. I'm only asking for clear communication rather than ambiguity and community guesswork. That's no way to lead. It just isn't good for the reasons I've stated that STILL REMAIN unchallenged or even addressed.
I tell you what, I'll be hanging out on mumble if anyone cares to discuss this rationally.
If we picked any good reason
to be our favorite reason
the suspicious would still reason
there was some other reason.
...and we would be right back to this same place again.
Very true Stan, but you have failed to provide ANY reason whatsoever, leaving the community to guess your motives and purpose. clear communication at least allows your supporters to have a firm platform of facts to dispense with any contrary claims. This is what I mean by you guys not learning your lesson.
You should study the trivium and Aristotelian logic to understand this and know when you're stepping into the world of sophism.
Isn't it MUCH easier to have onrams for bitUSD?
Isn't there alot more demand for buying bitUSD than buying bitGold?
BTW, the recent merger change the names to bitGOLD and bitSILVER .. just a FYI
QUESTION: If PTS price plummeted as for all intents and purposes it is useless right now, why hasn't the BTSX price plummeted equally? If there was a merger then wouldn't both be useless and worthless now and only BTS(when it's released, based on your holdings of both PTS and BTSX, be useful and valuable
I don't remember the exact quote, but I think it went something like this:Quote"I believe that this planet should commit itself to achieving the goal,
before this decade is out, of landing an unmanned company on the moon"
- John F. Kennedy
Either way, I don't see a lot happening in terms of alternative DACs. That part of the forum hasn't seen a decent new idea in months. IMHO, no reason to own PTS unless/until there are any signs of intelligent life beyond these initial DACs.
As a counter point MUSIC and PLAY came out of nowhere compared to what we knew on Feb 28th.
Why Bank, When You Can BitShare?
We need a slogan that doesn't call us a bank, but puts us in the same class.
Thoughts?
The original and the best. Encapsulates things exactly IMHO. Also pulls on the heart strings of those feeling less and less satisfied with traditional banks. Love it!
No public tip of the hat and the cold shoulder.....bizzare.
People still don't get how competition in this market works.
Heh?
