Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - daidai

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
31
中文 (Chinese) / Re: DNS领取BTS,BTS没到账
« on: January 22, 2015, 01:25:46 am »
也有其他人和我同样的问题呀,怎么解决呢,社区有帮忙传递声音到英文区吗?
或者英文区已经有类似声音了吗?

32
中文 (Chinese) / Re: DNS领取BTS,BTS没到账
« on: January 21, 2015, 04:06:36 am »
我 用命令行导入成功,提示OK了
但是没有解冻BTS发来。
和我一样,英文区也有人发贴在问,不知道这事怎么整

33
中文 (Chinese) / 用了0.6.1版本的BTS钱包,导入DNS无法领取BTS
« on: January 21, 2015, 02:17:08 am »
最新情况:
使用最新版的0.6.0及0.6.1 BTS钱包,情况依旧。我知道不少人也遇到相同的情况,包括武刺。
请问:如何才能解决该问题?

前奏:
DNS钱包里的DNS均经历过数次投票以及转账。

操作情况:
1,下载了最新版的0.0.5的keyid钱包
2,将备份的DNS钱包文件导入0.0.5钱包
3,通过菜单备份为新版DNS钱包
4,将该新钱包导入BTS钱包,提示成功,结果wallet_check_sharedrop查看,BTS总量没有变化(地址列表里也没有DNS的公钥)
5,通过从DNS钱包导出私钥,然后导入BTS,结果同第4步。
6,在BTS钱包通过命令行导入DNS钱包,结果同第4步。

疑问:
是不是一定要keyid的blockchain数据?----我已删除keyid的blockchain数据。
在快照之前我没有使用过0.5版本的DNS钱包。

34
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 1031 本周mumble會議問題收集
« on: October 29, 2014, 01:44:11 am »
+ 1%

35
个别专业词汇没有看懂,不过主要意思是懂了。
我目前最反对的就是新的BTS要进行DPOS挖矿。
每年8%上限.......BTS命运完全由101受托人主宰.....

36
坚守自己的信心,却也不要指责他人对BM的不信任。

37
General Discussion / Re: BM:i tell you why you are the bigest bug of bts
« on: October 23, 2014, 12:33:34 pm »
my love is gone.

38
另起炉灶,百花齐放?

39
it's a good idea. +5%

40
General Discussion / Re: BM you should listen ptser and agser's voice
« on: October 22, 2014, 02:43:43 am »
where is PTS=10%,where is AGS = 10%,when a new DAC is coming.

41
General Discussion / Re: Proposed Allocation for Merger
« on: October 22, 2014, 01:37:08 am »
Your decision makes too many people lose money,lose confidence and leave.

I3 start from PTS and AGS,now the product come out,you know it's the time to kill them.

you develop the toolkit by AGS fund,and PTS shareholders help to disseminate the DACs to new people.

I don't think it's a fair allocation .

42
这位哥,满屏幕全是你的贴子,你的意思大家已经很清楚了,可以不用再“自己顶”。

43
这个思想翻译转达一下才可能被看见吧

44
General Discussion / Re: Main reason of FUD from Chinese Community
« on: October 20, 2014, 07:31:38 am »
yes,it's full.

45
share holders are losing their confidence.

"Change" not followed the rule and not decentralized.

we love decentralization,that's why we follow i3.

but we can't accept all power control by a company named i3. We don't need a i3 who always change or want to change the decentralized rule .

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6