不错， ，相当于众筹做网关。

Actually  I had forecast this bad condition several  months ago
I suggest give a term of voting approve
eg .delegate can been vote with 3 months term , after there months this vote lose efficacy.

so  I suggest that there have a period of validity  when vote a delegate.    for example , purpose of  3% pay delegate is only maintain block chain, so  a period of validity is forever as default.  but for 100% pay rate delegate , it would been three months as default , but can change to any period votor want to

Great work , and is there Chinese version?

Is there a whole detail  expense   AGS fund?

You can start by going to the payouts page to see if your payout is located there:

http://pool.minebitshares.com/payouts

If you are mining with X11 I can tell you that payouts didn't go out last night because they were below the minimum threshold for processing. They will certainly go out tonight.

So if it was last nights payouts you are only referring to and it was X11, then this is why.

If there was some other payout the day before you were expecting that is showing on the payouts page, please feel free to contact me and provide all of your details.

yes I mine X11 and wait the first pay , )

Vote against them

Quote from: ebit on July 19, 2015, 03:07:23 pm

有必要写篇文章“3分归来看锚定”

2分那时己是认定归来，或是说从未离开过，只是隐退避下风头火势，怕又被关禁号！
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,16086.msg208312.html#msg208312

3分以下看好BTS，但还是不认可锚定法币的可行性，但认可BTS在团队的带领下，除了锚定，有更多的BTS应用如交易系统等应用和别的新应用是值得去期待的，不希望再放太多重心在锚定上，锚定当是系统的副产品就是最好不过了

可事实证明锚定是有效，无论BTS从3毛4到2分，bitcny锚定一直精确，当然精确的锚定是在承兑平台支持的前提下的，bitusd市场 完全是一个自由的市场，没有任何承兑平台支持，但很多情况下都在-10%-0这个范围内波动（预计在2.0的改进后锚定的精度将提高)，大部分原因是1个月强制平仓的影响，锚定虽然不精确，但可以说是有效的，其实外汇市场上一个主权货币，一年升值贬值5%-10% 也算高。

Let's say Alice has the following blockchain stored locally: B1, B2, ..., B1500.
The real consensus blockchain at time T is: B1, B2, ..., B3168.
There is a fake blockchain floating around in the network which first appeared at time T and looks like this: B1, B2, ..., B2000, B2001', B2002', ..., B3200'.
The common fork point between this fake blockchain and the real consensus chain is B2000. After this point this blockchain diverges form the real blockchain. The witnesses (which I will call "fake witnesses" from this point forward) at the time of B2000 continue to be active in the fake blockchain whereas they were all voted out in the real chain and replaced by new witnesses (which I will call "real witnesses" from this point forward) at block B2100 (start of new maintenance interval). Let's assume all the significant votes that caused the "fake witnesses" to be replaced by the "real witnesses" appeared between blocks B2001 and B2099.
This fake blockchain is a valid chain signed by witnesses according to the rules of the protocol following that chain. At time T it is longer than the real blockchain by about 32 blocks because the "fake witnesses" were able to have 100% witness participation while the "real witnesses" were only able to maintain 99% witness participation over the last 1000 blocks. Therefore, by the longest chain rule, people should prefer the fake chain over the real chain, but because the fork point is more than 1000 blocks old at the time T when the fake blockchain appeared on the network, none of the nodes online at that time would be tricked onto that fake chain (am I correct in this understanding?).

I don`t know if I understand you ,and the following is my thinking .
after fake delegates fork blockchain , on the fake chain would miss the block that should been produced by real delegates and meantime on the real chain would miss the block that should been produced by fake witnesses till  fake delegates been voted out ,
so
I resume there are 50 fake witnesses and 51 real witnesses , and if we don`t consider delegate off line and delegate order .
time                                               after C*101 blocks              after fake delegate been voted out  ,N*101 blocks
block height of fake chain              2000+50*C                         2000+50*C+50*N
block height of real chain               2000+51*C                         2000+101*C+101*N

and we can see if the fake delegates is less than real delegates ,the real chain must longer than fake chain if don`t consider delegate order .
but if we consider the delegate order .
I resume all the fake 50 delegate in the (1~50)order in first round after fork . and all the 51 delegates in the (51~101)order in this round , fork on B2000,  time from B2001 to B2050, the fake chain is the longer chain .
but the probability is very small, I think .
but on other hand , if this situation would as following
B0->    ->     ->    ->    ->    ->    ->    ->    ->    ->
B0->B1->B2->B3->B4->B5->B6->B7->B8->B9->
the first chain is a chain without block follow
so this is not fork actually .