Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bytemaster

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 656
181
General Discussion / Mannually Triggering Revoting Idea
« on: January 04, 2016, 10:05:13 pm »
The purpose of this BSIP is to minimize the cost incurred by the network doing unnecessary operations every maitenance interval.

Every hour votes are tallied and 99% of the time there is no meaningful change. Under this proposal, votes would only be tallied when requested by a user and at most once per maintenance interval. The fee for tallying votes would be around $5.

Users of the system can determine whether or not there is a $5 difference in votes that would justify a re-tally. A worker, witness, or committee member who got voted in would pay $5 to have the vote counted.

The side effect of this behavior would be to greatly improve reindexing performance, the vast majority of which is spent tallying votes that never change.

Witnesses producing blocks on the maintenance interval can pre-tally the votes and compare them to the last value. They can then indicate whether or not anything changed significantly in the block they produce.

If there is no one who stands to benefit by more than $5 then chances are it is an unnecessary update to the voting totals.

183
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 02:27:19 pm »
I will vote the rest of you back in later today.  I hope everyone who was voted out knows it was nothing personal, I was just attempting to get to 67% participation before more drastic measures were required.

184
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 02:14:43 pm »
Thank you everyone who helped get the witnesses back up in a timely manner.

185
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 04:10:37 am »
57.8125% participation and rising..

Proxies please support delegated-proof-of-steak and clayop because they are quality witnesses who got up to date faster than everyone else.  A quick vote could get us up to 67% participation in a timely manner.

186
General Discussion / Re: Witness Alerts and Status
« on: January 04, 2016, 03:54:33 am »
It appears 40% of the witnesses are now up to date and in sync using this:

Witnesses:

* If you want to follow my chain, please add my seed node 114.92.254.159:62015. and
 add this to the witness_node start command:

--checkpoint '[2359545,"002400f965e4ad8b494d48dfb8d311d59cd771bc"]' -s "114.92.254.159:62015"

The checkpoint is not needed, but will help avoid any confusion.

https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/releases/tag/2.0.160103b

There may be a follow up release later this week that fixes this issue in greater detail after we have more time for peer review.




187
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 03:30:06 am »
We have 24% of the witnesses producing blocks in sync now.   The rest should update asap.

188
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 03:28:56 am »
not sure why ? i am getting "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" after starting node

Run in GDB and post backtrace.

189
General Discussion / Re: Witness Alerts and Status
« on: January 04, 2016, 02:49:50 am »
Everyone running a full node with the latest release, please shut it down, it will no longer sync with the network due to a recent bug and it may end up preventing others from joining the network.   

Once we are sure all issues have been resolved we will make an official release.  For now, join the witnesses in telegram for help reviving the network.

190
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 01:42:33 am »
Any witnesses willing to help try an untested patch can update to the latest master on github.   

I am not a witness so I cannot verify if this fixes block production or not.  You may have to specify a checkpoint. 


191
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 01:30:05 am »
I should have a patch ready soon. 

192
General Discussion / Re: Q1 Roadmap for CNX
« on: January 02, 2016, 11:23:33 pm »
Why is bondmarket/p2p lending not on the roadmap? You said yourself that exchanges are the most profitable type of business in the crypto-space, and the best exchanges are distinguishing themselves (and profiting massively) by offering lending for shorting.

Is this MAS thing more than just the pipedream & expensive distraction that blockchain-based voting services was?

I am talking about Q1, ultimately everything is on the roadmap we just need to make steady progress.

193
General Discussion / Re: Q1 Roadmap for CNX
« on: January 02, 2016, 11:18:48 pm »
I'm little upset because you keep ignoring BSIP 4 (percentage based fee for filled order). Any reasons?

Let me look at USD-BTS market in last 24 hours. It has 14 filled orders with 160k BTS volume. This generated 140 BTS fee (10 BTS per filled order).
If we implement percentage based fee, and assuming the fee rate is 0.1%, plus reducing order creation fee to 1 BTS, the total fee will be 164 BTS (160k * 0.001 + 1 * 14) which is 24% higher than the current fee system.

People won't complain BSIP 4 because this system is already broadly adopted by many exchanges. It will also resolve a problem of relatively higher fees on small traders.
With more fees generated, referrers will be  happy as well.

I didn't intentionally exclude any BSIP. Something like BSIP4 we could implement under the proposed SUPPORT workers.  The change is essentially to direct market fees through the fee pool and then through to the referral program for committee assets. Note that this proposal contradicts another improvement which is to transfer these same fees to the issuer of a UIA. All told, BSIP4 should probably have two modes: when trading between two assets controlled by the committee it goes to the referral program, when trading between a UIA and an asset controlled by the committee the fee should go to the UIA issuer.

194
General Discussion / Q1 Roadmap for CNX
« on: January 02, 2016, 04:50:11 pm »
I would like to let everyone know what I am currently thinking in terms of CNX priorities for Q1 2016.

1. STEALTH - this project is being funded by a community member and takes highest priority
2. MAKER - this will be implemented by me and has no GUI component
3. API - this is actively being worked on by Michael and will continue to improve
4. SUPPORT - several worker proposals will be created to fund CNX to perform basic support, maintenance, and complete the implementation of existing features.

In the background I will be planning / exploring the MAS concept and attempting to gain traction. This will be the business area I would like to take CNX into as a business built on BitShares.   

195
General Discussion / Re: 2016 Vision Blog Post
« on: January 02, 2016, 04:45:06 pm »
I enjoyed the blog post! Vision isn't everything, but it's important to have.. and this is a good one. The MAS is a smart strategy all around, and to have it on our chain could bring a lot of the right people and attention to the project.

It's important to realize that BitShares is already ready for people to build beta apps on (and they are). Yes, it has a lot of "technical depth" so the current learning curve is a bit steep. Testing, experimentation, documentation, & support by non-core developers and users is all it takes to lower the curve.. it just takes time.

Because the DEX is not an FBA, there is little incentive to allocate FULL resources towards making it into the next Poloniex.. maybe that's the price we pay for socialist features ;) The good news is that since it's part of  core infrastructure, businesses will be incentivized to improve it going forward.

+1

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 656