Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - fuzzy

Pages: 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43
616
MemoryCoin / MemoryCoin
« on: February 10, 2014, 05:35:07 am »
I just wanted to stop by and say thank you to everyone for the hard work you put in.  A community is a valuable thing.  We often forget that tokens only carry value because our relationships create a bond that imbues them with substance beyond their material form.  In short, our bond is our value. 

I am honored to see this little group chugging away like you are.  Good Job. 

617
General Discussion / Great News for the Industry and Competition
« on: February 05, 2014, 11:03:16 am »
PeerShares looks like it is going to be a beautiful system and the Devs/Community are very respectable.  Something worth looking at found on PeerCoin's Subreddit:  http://www.reddit.com/r/peercoin/comments/1w1wte/peercoin_subproject_peershare_injected_with_500k/

They definitely would fit well in this area...



*Disclosure: I will likely purchase a few PeerShares and have 330 PeerCoin--out of respect for its innovation and community.  And would like to help facilitate growth of the crypto network by covering "Coins", "Shares" and "Communities" I believe in.

618
I would like to start doing video interviews for individuals working on future DACs that honor the ProtoShares/AngelShares Social Consensus.  I am currently gauging interest to see if it is something the community would rubber stamp.  These interviews would be posted to Youtube.

Please bump this post with a +1 if you would like me to look into your project proposal or would like to see this happen.

619
This is a cheap means of establishing the Invictus Innovation's Brand.  I am only 18min in but suffice it to say, Vitalik Buterin is already trying to say this is the first of its kind...of course, noone in the crypto community would know any different at this juncture since there are no Invictus faces and voices on the net.  Outreach creates Buzz, Hangouts can be nearly free and can be leveraged for cheap advertisement and to establish a foundation to stand as a bulwark against other teams try to say they were first to this arena. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtnojp454DA

I would gladly host weekly hangout-styled interviews with the Invictus Team for updates on progress, changes, opinions. 

620
General Discussion / Legal Question
« on: January 21, 2014, 11:00:50 pm »
"Does anyone know of work on the legal barriers to running alt(e.g zero)coin to bitcoin exchanges or acting as a third party guarantor?" Ian Miers  (twitter @secparam)

Ian wrote the original paper on ZeroCoin and presented it.  Pretty sure the team @InvictusInnovations has been confronted or is confronting problems in a similar domain with Keyhotee.  I would like to use this opportunity to help him make a connection to some of the brightest minds in the field right now...here at BitSharesTalk.org and will send him a link when it is answered sufficiently. 

I have also asked him to check out ProtoShares as a platform for his technology, so if any Devs have Twitter, Please hit him up!


621
General Discussion / What happens to Manipulated Commodity Prices?
« on: January 20, 2014, 10:15:06 pm »
What happens to Manipulated Commodity Prices when BitShares and other crypto-markets open up?  Will Silver and Gold, in particular, go up in price as the Crypto-Equity markets slowly gain traction and grow to encompass Wall Street in their Shadow?

Interested on peoples' take.

622
Keyhotee / Block Chain Absolute Surveillance? "Mark of the Beast"?
« on: January 03, 2014, 06:17:09 am »
Ok...there are going to be some people who scoff at this post, but I encourage everyone to consider this moving forward and, hopefully, we can speak rationally about this a little bit.  It certainly is a very interesting topic to me---even as a person who has a real skeptical streak about the Bible's Messages and source. 

Of all of these messages, the Mark of the Beast one really hits home with me...ESPECIALLY after learning more about the blockchain.  If I were a Tyrant, I would want data from EVERYTHING "My" citizens do.  The Block Chain, though highly unlikely at this current time, could CERTAINLY be used as a protocol layer that captures, monitors and eventually alters every entity, action, state in the entire spectrum of organic existence. 

If there is a God (which, to me there has to be SOME form of Grand Creator), I would imagine he/she/it would have created a system that would be perfect...and that to truly corrupt humanity a new LAYER would need to be built upon that protocol, and would introduce flaws into an already-homeostatic environment.  I started really thinking about this after reading the following post:

"Okay, I'm being humorous with that one, but on a more serious note- what if we were to consider Bitcoin becomes widely successful and adopted worldwide. What if the government would one day see the value in having near infinite addresses for a finite amount of people in the world. What if governments started dolling out addresses to individuals like Social Security numbers and mandated that you use that address for your transactions.

Certainly businesses could be forced to use specific 'assigned' addresses, (it's easy enough to check if they aren't) and then the government can sit back and watch the block chain to asses their tax responsibility.

What if your Bitcoin address were required as a form of identification? We assume that Bitcoin has an element of anonymity because no one knows who owns the addresses, but governments could do a pretty good job of forcing individuals to keep public accounts and then watch closely.

It's anonymous only so long as addresses aren't assigned. If they are assigned though, the blockchain becomes a pretty incredible tool for surveillance of a population. 

The Mark of the Beast is a reference to the outcry from some Christian groups about how Social Security Numbers were the "mark of the beast". http://usa-the-republic.com/mark%20of%20beast/Forward.htm "

The thread can be found @ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=86792.msg953480#msg953480

Definitely a good read, but I hope we will all keep this in the back of our minds while we move forward in this technological breakthrough.  Please dont get me wrong here in thinking that I do not see the merits of the blockchain and what can be built with it...but that SAME amazing potential can always be a double-edged sword.  I am interested to see where the community stands with regard to greatest concerns and how to address them in the future. 

As always guys and gals....much <3

623
General Discussion / Cloud Mining DAC -- Project Camelot
« on: December 17, 2013, 01:39:52 pm »
After a long and, at many points heated, discussion with regard to Angel Shares' implementation I sat and thought about it.  Now I'm not a high-end miner so maybe i'm mistaken, but it feels like I might have thought up a potential solution that would cover the middle ground between forcing a centralized mining service along with proof-of-stake for protoshares.  This may only be a partial solution, or worse, none at all...but it seems worth posting. 

Distributed "Cloud" Mining DAC.  This DAC would be formed by clusters of heavy-duty and little miners (like pools) who want to put their Hashing Power up for bid/sale.  The DAC would be made up of many "little" miners to form a service similar to Amazon AWS and DigitalOcean, with one chief difference.  This would already have a GUI Interface with embedded and most up-to-date miners for each specific coin available.   

DAC Services Provided (with great emphasis on non mining-savvy individuals)

   -- Mine BitCoin/Altcoins of choice with just the push of a button
   -- A simple interface for calculating profitability of each coin based off feeds from popular exchanges
   -- Support Merged Mining of Coins where applicable
   -- Pay with Credit Card for services and thus giving another, trusted method of attaining coins
   -- Pay with BitCoin and/or Community-Approved Altcoins
   -- Provide Businesses with extra computational capacity to utilize that capacity to aid in the mining of coins through a direct connection to the Cloud Services (IT departments would then earn value from otherwise-wasted computational capacity during down hours. 


Income Proposal:
   
   -- Credit Card or Bank Wire via Mining Service Users
   -- Receiving small donation of all coins mined (users can choose between amounts to contribute--but they must contribute--and can choose areas and percentages of their donation would like a percentage ithin future DAC layers). 
   -- Would except Faucet/Advertisement Donations from other Altcoin-development teams to create a built-in faucet feature for any Altcoin Donated to faucet address (a percentage of these will go directly into funding future DAC Development----NOT necessary, but good idea from coin-dev's point of view)
   -- Would receive a small percentage of mined coins from Businesses contributing to the mining DAC (or they would earn shares in the DAC for farming, which could then be traded for other Altcoins on a Market)
   -- Offer Escrow Services for selling coins (take a percentage off the top)?
   -- The service would also mine shares that could be openly traded for other crypto-currencies


ProtoShares holders would receive 5% of total shares in the profitability (pulling that percentage from somewhere dark and foul)


Invictus Innovations could then contribute the mining hardware they have in a competitive market where decisions are even further decentralized.  The Benefit Invictus has here over AWS is that it leverages the skills of a community who has spent a GREAT DEAL of time mastering the art of mining and can create the front end while expecting Altcoin-Devs to contribute mining software plugins for the service, or the DAC's team of developers would do this work. 


Hope this makes sense and I hope everyone finds this helpful.  I am certain there would be much more to this and I am writing this with about 23 hours without sleep so I may have missed a point or two.  Please lets start a conversation about this and lets break and fix this idea until we come up with something workable as a community team. 

Invictus would create a PLATFORM to perform all these tasks, would participate in the mining and would be rewarded for whatever % they contribute to the "pool" of miners-for-hire.  This provides Invictus with Profits from renting miners, would only be ONE income stream and would Invictus would be competing against other miners (keeping the system decentralized).  However, the donations from both Client and Enterprise levels would be used to develop Invictus DAC's based on a percentage chosen by the donater (for a similar system see Humble-Bundles and their game-purchasing apparatus)

624
General Discussion / Non-Profit DACs?
« on: December 06, 2013, 11:25:38 am »
http://altcoins.com/curecoin.html

Very interesting.  Along the same lines as PrimeCoin.  Could #DACs be built as non-profits??  I would assume parallel mining could be done with nearly all of them.  These types of things build trust from the outside community, actually help humanity and are basically free PR. 

Hell I might mine just for these sometimes...but merged mining?  It would be incredible to my thinking.

625
General Discussion / Safe Password Entry Practices?
« on: December 03, 2013, 06:39:16 pm »
I heard somewhere using windows on-screen keyboard is the safest way to enter passwords.  Is this correct? 

Or, better yet, are there any programs/plugins that automatically encrypt your passwords when you are connected to the inet? 

Interested in keeping my stuff safe...

626
General Discussion / KryptoKit
« on: November 27, 2013, 11:41:15 am »
http://invictus-innovations.com/mission/ @ approx 31:50 there is a segment worth setting up.  I honestly would love to see a little "DAC" of sorts open up as a venture for features like this to be "mined" into existence somehow by people who believe in it.  Would be VERY interesting PR move for Invictus Innovations...as well as the value of the currencies. 

*I'm editing to post the link Here: Let's Talk Bitcoin, Episode 62"

627
Senate Banking Committee, backed by the largest military force in the world and a rabid bureaucratic regime who is increasingly reminded that the structure upon which they rely for power and influence is consistently eroding, meet to talk about the future of Bitcoin.  Very interesting stuff to listen to...

Please watch and add your reflections.  Let us attempt to provide dev's and community with our honest assessments of the situation and potential developments for which we may need to prepare.  The collective ideas and experiences of our community can provide vast insight into how entrepreneurs can adapt in an environment that is now openly increasing its level of awareness and the potential "threats" true innovation represents to a few central authorities behind a largely corrupt, obtuse and dying system.  An old Alpha Dog cornered is still deadly...and right now SOME people are openly drawing lines in the sand and battle plans.  We CAN have a Velvet Revolution and STILL help potential enemies learn the true potential entrepreneurs Free Space represent.  How do we turn this "battle" into a coalition of understanding?

Part 1:
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/316289-1

Part 2: 
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/316346-1


628
Would this be possible?  Would it be preferable?  Is there some Technological factor I am not taking into account that would give reason for why would would not accomplish this?

629
Keyhotee / Purchasing Identities...and loss of future DAC buy-in?
« on: November 18, 2013, 11:01:36 pm »
When we purchase an identity within the project keyhotee DAC system...does that mean we forgo all future shares in DAC's related to them?  How does this aspect work?

630
General Discussion / PolitiShares?
« on: November 18, 2013, 11:20:51 am »
Could this model be used to bring TRUE crowd-sourced ratings on politicians based on voting records? 

We all know of the quote "Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics"...because up until now Statistics were almost always altered by some Central Authority.  With the introduction of DAC's (god you guys are awesome for this invention btw), ratings could truly be crowd-sourced...and statistical models built upon data truly gathered through the "wisdom of the masses".   

Pages: 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43