Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - fuzzy

Pages: 1 ... 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 [331] 332 333 334 335 336
4951
Sometimes the blockchain's utility makes one's head feel like imploding...is this the most impressive invention ever to be created by humanity? 

in 5-10 years we are going to laugh at how we thought in these "early" years...

4952
BitShares PTS / Re: 1 PTS Paper wallet as gift
« on: January 22, 2014, 05:51:44 am »
I thought I had heard somewhere that using paper wallets destroyed the paper wallet address upon use (unless things have changed).  I wonder, then how easily one would get their BitShares from said paper wallets if the PTS are still on that after BTS launch...

Please let me know if this is correct or incorrect.

4953
General Discussion / Re: Any Coin
« on: January 22, 2014, 05:47:55 am »
or find a way to implement an aspect of POW that only a human can do.  Would that be possible though? Sounds Treky :-X

4954
BitShares AGS / Re: ANGELSHARES SOCIAL CONSENSUS LICENSE
« on: January 22, 2014, 12:10:34 am »
"the Alternative DAC shall allocate at least 10% of the Money Supply, proportionally to the holders of PTS, and at least 10% of the Money Supply, proportionally to the holders of AGS (the “Social Consensus”) at genesis"

So I have read two alternative schools of thought on how this works.  One is exactly how you described it, which makes AGS exacly like PTS only they can be considered to have a time until they reach "maturity", at which point they will be allowed to float on the market as well.  Is this correct?

I ask because there is an alternative viewpoint on the forums expressed that states AGS will only be honored by BTS chains...

Looks good though. 

+1

4955
General Discussion / Legal Question
« on: January 21, 2014, 11:00:50 pm »
"Does anyone know of work on the legal barriers to running alt(e.g zero)coin to bitcoin exchanges or acting as a third party guarantor?" Ian Miers  (twitter @secparam)

Ian wrote the original paper on ZeroCoin and presented it.  Pretty sure the team @InvictusInnovations has been confronted or is confronting problems in a similar domain with Keyhotee.  I would like to use this opportunity to help him make a connection to some of the brightest minds in the field right now...here at BitSharesTalk.org and will send him a link when it is answered sufficiently. 

I have also asked him to check out ProtoShares as a platform for his technology, so if any Devs have Twitter, Please hit him up!


4956
General Discussion / Re: Any Coin
« on: January 21, 2014, 10:45:05 am »
If you're going to do distribution via computational mining, I like this idea a lot.

Amen

4957
General Discussion / Re: Canonizer.com DAC
« on: January 21, 2014, 10:36:40 am »
This is a good DAC...

4958
why not go bigger?  create a DAC that allows people to connect to merged-mining pools (of which you would only be one) through Keyhotee, and allow miners to "rent" their computing power out for the market to decide what is mined.  Develop the interface and miners earn both a % of mined altcoins, but also HashShares that can float against other shares in the open market and either be redeemed for hashing power or sold on the market.  Then...you are basically incentivizing content providers to come to you.

 

4959
You've definitely found a niche...

I don't know about you guys, but the BlockChain makes me so happy, especially reading this stuff. 

4960
Sorry I thought initially you were talking about 3D Printing Cups so I used that as the example.   

Sounds like you want to make it plug and play for individuals and/or businesses with larger scale 3D printers want to service local businesses in custom packaging of their product. If that is the case you and I, I think are thinking in similar realms...though I think your proposal fits well as an initial DAC that could later expand into other 3D-printed objects.  "Bring Production Home" could be a good marketing phrase ;)

Is the BlockChain Protocol going to be implemented into this distributed Custom-Packaging Business?


I realize that this is still too much in my head to ask someone else to describe quite yet, I think this bounty is more wishful thinking on my part for someone to do the work for me haha.     I will better articulate my needs once I have some time.

Let's not call it "work".  Making the world more inclusive is fun stuff..

4961
This is an old post of mine that didn't get too much response, but seems pertinent to this discussion so I hope everyone is ok with me posting the link.  https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=836.0

This concept, Adam, seems very similar to the one you are proposing--though yours seems as though it is only for custom-printed cups (if I read that all correctly, that is). 

After some thought and a bit of time between posts on this concept, I would like to elaborate further (this is not going to be in the format of a whitepaper--yet).  It seems like the proposal would be a DAC within the 3D-printing DAC, wherein the Cups are 3D-Printed using cup models from any number of models submitted. 

Designing/Selling Models
Designers can model and post these along with the price for each use of their submitted model:
For instance, Bob submits his model and prices the uses individually @.25 mBits each, he also has increasingly lower prices set for progressively larger orders (.2 mBits @ 10-99 uses, .15 @ 100-499 uses, .14 @ 500-999 uses, .13 mBit @ 1000-9999 uses)
Tom also submits his model.  His prices are as follows: @.50 mBit each, .45 mBit @ 10-99 uses, .35 mBit @ 100-499 uses, .25 @ 500-999 uses, .125 mBit @ 1000-9999 uses)
*Note*  mBits would likely actually be xferred to the DAC's own "currency", mined into existence through the p2p network's processing of transactions.


User Interface/Purchases
Using the Blockchain data, coded utilities can analyze purchases over time.  Metrics for the most popular cup models would be provided to potential customers through a pleasant browser/POS interface along with various filtering options (dimensions, cost, trending models, historically popular models, famous designers...etc).  A search feature could also be included...along with potential for detailed product descriptions/reviews (also stored in the blockchain(s)).  To potential customers, this interface could look very similar to something like Amazon or Ebay.

3D-Printing
3D-Printing Businesses would then be incentivized to add the necessary infrastructure on their end to facilitate automated transactions through this and other 3D-printing DACs.  Numerous DACs pop up and with them numerous other 3D Printing Businesses. 

Copyright VS Trust
Designs may be copied/cloned, but there should be some kind of mechanism for the community to label the original creator when they find clones.  This would allow the reputation of the modeler/printing business dev team to become the ultimate form of currency and trusted blockchain networks would verify the time/date of original posting.  Many large 3D Printing businesses would likely eventually build their own DACs rather than depend on a 3rd party blockchain.  The processing of transactions would award shares in the DAC, the value of which would float on BitShares-type Exchanges against other similar DACs.  The Trust the DAC Devs, 3D Model Designers and Businesses are directly related to the price of the DACs.  Business relationships, then, will hinge on gaining trust from the market. 

Please feel free to alter this as you see fit, or inform me in the areas where I am mistaken so we can build upon it!  This is how progress is made, and it is precisely the innovation WE create as a community that will drive further innovation...and quite possibly MORE important, set the standard for those to come after us.  We together we can build industries that fight for the trust of their users in a free market an enhanced version of evolution of ideas through open sharing.  Please let us look at how we can make this work and post your invaluable opinions.

@ Adam, please let me know if I got this wrong anywhere.  I know your concept also spoke of custom designs/printing on the cups (or other designs), but that could be a layer on top of the 3D-Printing DACs and a secondary service offered by either 3rd parties Printing/Labeling Services.


4962
General Discussion / What happens to Manipulated Commodity Prices?
« on: January 20, 2014, 10:15:06 pm »
What happens to Manipulated Commodity Prices when BitShares and other crypto-markets open up?  Will Silver and Gold, in particular, go up in price as the Crypto-Equity markets slowly gain traction and grow to encompass Wall Street in their Shadow?

Interested on peoples' take.

4963
General Discussion / Re: Coinjoin implementation
« on: January 20, 2014, 08:49:53 pm »
i'd be very interested in seeing this happen to.  Any responses forthcoming?

4964
ive gone ahead with secp256r1 32, the library is now in the src folder, it has these functions of interest

int ecc_make_key(
    uint8_t p_publicKey[ECC_BYTES+1],
    uint8_t p_privateKey[ECC_BYTES]
);

that creates a public/private key pair

int ecdsa_sign(
    const uint8_t p_privateKey[ECC_BYTES],
    const uint8_t p_hash[ECC_BYTES],
    uint8_t p_signature[ECC_BYTES*2]
);

Generates an ECDSA signature for a given hash value.

int ecdsa_verify(
    const uint8_t p_publicKey[ECC_BYTES+1],
    const uint8_t p_hash[ECC_BYTES],
    const uint8_t p_signature[ECC_BYTES*2]
);

Verifies an ECDSA signature.

credit goes to kmackay for this.

if anyone has an idea how to replace the nonce as required, just fork this repository https://github.com/Nameshar/Divsshares
and get to it. I'll be trying to figure it out as well but i'd appreciate a hand.

Why secp256r1 instead of secp256k1 as used in Bitcoin? There are concerns that secp256r1 was intentionally weakened by the NSA: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=151120.0

Amen.

4965
General Discussion / Re: Marketing Idea: Double Dip PTS to AGS days?
« on: January 19, 2014, 04:33:16 am »
To me this is a simple concept and one with a large body of psychological evidence showing random stimulus to be the most effective attempting to incentivize a particular behavior.  This is psych 101. (or at the very most 201) and has roots in the Behaviorist school of thought--which is arguably the most important contribution Psychology has ever given to the science of Marketing. 

These proclivities for psychological-banter aside, however, I agree with those on both sides in this thread--especially about the considerations for a loss of trust in the social contract.  However, there is one thought I have not yet read in this thread and seems to me could make the arguments moot--aren't AngelShares issuance currently behind that of ProtoShares in total number?  As such, it should be possible to use the strategy proposed for a number of purposes:
     1)  Bring issuance of PTS/AGS into parity over time such that PTS/AGS are each 2mil/2mil @ launch of BitShares.
     2)  To incentivize an increase in donations
     3)  Increase price of PTS (as it is only 1 of 2 ways to purchase AGS)
     4)  Keep Social Contract Intact
     
The only people who could possibly lose out would be those who originally invested in PTS/BTC in  AGS.  However, that could be mediated by awarding everyone who invested in AGS up to the date of this proposal's launch a x2 award for each day invested (not random). 

If this were done, it should keep people's trust in Invictus' ability to deliver in line with their social contract.  People who would grow upset by contract "volatility" over time would likely tend to have more patience when those changes made by Invictus always offer immediate rewards for those invested before changes are made.  But it would also potentially provide a 5th benefit:  onlooking investors in this sector would see Invictus as a company that goes above and beyond their contract obligations...and to me the chance that I will earn unknown rewards if/when changes are implemented in the future would tend to make me feel more comfortable investing in a company that is going to NEED at least a modicum of adaptability. 

Just my two cents.  Hope others will let me know where my logic is lacking...or where it makes sense.   

Pages: 1 ... 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 [331] 332 333 334 335 336