16
BitShares PTS / Re: DO NOT USE PtsGPUz0.3.exe | hidden pts workers
« on: January 15, 2014, 05:24:26 pm »
@OP, I dont mind 5% or so, maybe even 10%, but 20% is a whole lot man.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Would moving to another pool reduce the payouts?
The only thing I dont like about Ypool is the 1 pts payout. But other than that I kind of like it. I dont mind checking out 1Gh or Beeeeer, but which one would be better? 1Gh seem to have a better interface
You'll have higher variance in smaller pools; however (assuming that you have the same hashrate) on average, a lower fee pool should pay out more than a high fee pool.
be^5 is 2.5% vs ypool's 6%, and I'm planning to have all my machines pointed there for a long time, so I don't mind. Plus, having that much hashing power at one node opens up the risk of a double spend attack :/ I think it would be neat if somebody could develop a standard p2pool-like distributed pool for current and future DACs.