I have seen someone talking of getting 3.5K CPM on a 280X. Has anyone ever heard of that?

BTW, AMAZING job on this miner! Keep it coming!!

W7-64-Cata 13.12 / 280X / 1125 core / 1500 mem / 3450 cpm
this 280X-cards are a dream for windows-mining with this fast NaN-miner

my 290X does about the same - NaN suggested a failure in windows compared to linux for this 290X-numbers

pool down?

Another good news!  ominer 0.8 will released on  Feb 7!  New algorithm added  optimization for HD5xxx and  HD77xx, even HD69xxx may faster,  please try and compare benchmark results later.

when do you release your new ominer 0.8?

version 0.1.3 / two threads / W7-64-catalyst 13.12

on my 290X-rig: the cpm down approximately ~3-4 % compared to version 0.1.2 / two threads

yeah, possible back-up-pool would be a great thing for the future!

one position to realize is the point, that the share-/hashrate of beeeeer-pool nearly doubled from the day your miner is at the front - i know it could be more to secure the network - but we have to start and see where it goes!

Quote from: dongjin0 on February 03, 2014, 01:59:35 pm

Quote from: Schwede65 on January 28, 2014, 08:48:33 pm

Here are some numbers of my cards:
HD 7850:  930 cpm
HD 7950: 1815 cpm
R9  270: 1115 cpm
R9 270X: 1265 cpm
R9 290X: 2535 cpm

It's very strange that my 3x Asus 7850 could just run with about 700 cpm, even less than your one card. I tried new driver, it still doesn't work normally. Could you please help me find the solution? My English is not very good, hope you could understand me!

Are you overclocking?  And more to the point is Schwede65?  May be it is not a like comparison.  I get 780 cpm on a standard 7850.

you didn't ask me directly - yeah, i'm overclocking as hell - all what the card does with msi-afterburner - not the voltage at the card
the cards are running cooler with NaN's-miner then scrypt-mining - using less energy (~70 - 75 % compared to scrypt-mining)
so - why not overclocking these little tiny cards, when they stay around 60 °C with 75 % fan-speed?
that gives more mined PTS:)
e.g. three 7850-gpu / 1150 core / 1400 memory (they came as a overclocked version 1000/1225/2GB)
1023 cpm + 1026 cpm + 1029 cpm

Quote from: Darkbane on February 02, 2014, 03:02:55 pm

Quote from: Bigboppa on February 02, 2014, 02:35:18 pm

New AMD driver 14.1 beta1.6 gives ~ 4150 cpm @ 2x 280x !!!
Some "new" warnings appearing..

what were you getting with the clpts miner before updating the driver?

before update ~4050 cpm

my experience with this 14.1 beta 1.6:
system with 3 x 290X: updated from 13.12 to 14.1 beta
the first gpu runs fine
BUT the second and third gpu only with 25 % of their cpm before
i will keep my hands away from this beta...

nan it is possible to run 2 threads on 1 GPU?? haity 280x??
how i can test from command line?
thanks!!!
and really good job!

My experience with this:
i made a batch-file ".bat" on W7-64 - i started this 2 times on my R9 290X - but the summed hashrate of the two threads was ~5% lower compared to one running thread per gpu