Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - thisisausername

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
31
DAC PLAY / Re: Whens the Poker DAC coming out?
« on: September 28, 2014, 12:42:44 am »
If you are playing strangers (or delegates) then even if you can trust the shuffle and dealing you cannot prevent other players from colluding.
This is true for any poker site in the wild.

Yes this is true no matter what. Collusion doesn't necessitate winning in poker.

It changes the odds in favor of the colluding parties.

Which is, itself, a signal that can be detected (potentially not with massive false-positive/negative rates -- I haven't looked into it.)

Not that it's terribly relevant since, "This is true for any poker site in the wild."

There was some discussion of this back in this old thread.

32
DAC PLAY / Re: Whens the Poker DAC coming out?
« on: September 27, 2014, 05:42:11 am »
Sergio Lerner's still on the team, too, right?

33
General Discussion / Re: dat peg doe
« on: September 27, 2014, 01:33:29 am »
You also got NuBits (and the potential primary issue) right.

Not that I think it's deal-breaking.  If it weren't for fragmentation I'd advocate for launching a BTSX clone with that model.  Something about how in the long run we're all dead.

34
General Discussion / Re: Failure to peg currencies to USD?
« on: September 03, 2014, 04:51:53 pm »
China buys large amounts of USD to keep the yuan undervalued relative to the dollar to prop up their manufacturing and export sectors.  Without this intervention the yuan would be closer to parity with the USD.  The situation with BitUSD/USD isn't quite the same.

The BitUSD market is set up such that the natural valuation tends toward parity with the US dollar if any of the following are true:
  • BTSX has a stable valuation that the market believes will remain stable for the near future.  This allow liquidity into BitUSD as a stable store of value.
  • BitUSD markets are deep enough to absorb expected BTSX shocks.  (This is really just a different way of looking at 1.)
  • Exogenous demand for BitUSD is high.  This, of course, will directly drive liquidity into BitUSD markets.
Currently none of these are true.

1 does not hold because the market is split on the future of BTSX.  Bulls think it is severely undervalued and so have no interest in BitUSD.  Bears think BitAssets cannot work and, thus, BTSX is primed for complete collapse.
2 does not hold because the market is incredibly immature and shallow.
3 does not hold because BitUSD is, currently, mostly useless.

With a larger community (or, perhaps, even just time as bulls and bears revert their BTSX expectations to the mean) the ambivalence of the market could be mitigated enough that 1 could become true.  Same for 2.

3 could become true as services and other uses for BitUSD come online.  For example, shops that accept BitUSD (unlikely to happen first) or interest bearing BitUSD.

35
General Discussion / Re: Can we talk about BitAssets and how they work?
« on: August 28, 2014, 03:53:06 am »
Am I missing something?

Not really.  This might be somewhat enlightening.

36
BitShares AGS / Re: AGS Explorer snapshot info
« on: August 23, 2014, 08:22:39 pm »
Keep in mind that LTS are a third party DAC (well, I guess they all are, now, in a sense) built on scrypt hashing with some lotto features built in to the blockchain and wallet.

It is not BitShares Charity the re-branded games effort from the primary team.

37
BitShares AGS / Re: AGS Explorer snapshot info
« on: August 23, 2014, 07:51:45 pm »
LTS are LottoShares, I suspect.

38
General Discussion / Re: The India / Southeast Asia Market
« on: August 22, 2014, 03:38:34 pm »
Fastest growing smartphone market in the world...

Do we have mobile BitShares Toolkit / BTSX stuff in the pipeline?

39
October 9th, 20:00 UTC

I'd guess the current rally will crash until marketing kicks into high gear and we start bringing in huge swathes of outsiders.

40
General Discussion / Re: What if the market-peg doesn't work?
« on: August 21, 2014, 06:15:38 pm »
The placebo point is that the fallback mechanism has the action of increasing confidence in the market even if it is never activated.

(I think.)

41
General Discussion / Re: Who here wants to BUY BitUSD and at what price?
« on: August 21, 2014, 06:09:19 pm »
If BitUSD existed right now and I was a day-trader, I might buy until after a small correction and consolidation.   Imagine a bitcoin bubble, you are bullish bitcoin but think it has grown too fast, so you switch to USD hoping to buy back in cheaper.   Same deal here.
(Bolding mine.)

Some might argue your rationality has already gone out the window, at that point.  :P

Note: I'm not saying that I think the market peg won't work.  I think it will.  There are certainly day-traders out there.  Not to mention people straight-up willing to take one for the team,
I think I have enough BTSX that the perception of a stable peg helps me more than having max leverage.

42
General Discussion / Re: Who here wants to BUY BitUSD and at what price?
« on: August 21, 2014, 05:46:56 pm »
Hey, it's the tragedy of the commons!

Individual behaviour horizontal, group behaviour vertical:
Code: [Select]
        BTSX     Both    bUSD
BTSX-   -2      ?        1
BTSX+    2      1       -1

It's rational for every individual to simply hold BTSX under the assumption that it will appreciate when the market peg is successful.  However, if everyone holds BTSX the market peg won't be successful.  So a bunch of people (or BTSX, at least) have to take one for the team (be collateralized to bUSD) to get the ball rolling.

43
General Discussion / Re: Negative Post about Bitshares
« on: August 19, 2014, 06:05:42 pm »
The blog post was not very informed of course.
But I think it is provoked by too steep claims (With an effective yield on BitUSD of 20% per year you must compare it against other USD investments, such as lending it to the bank at 3% per year).
People find things suspicious that are too good to be true. And that is a healthy reaction in almost all cases. 
We can learn something from it too.

This!  This!!

The linked blog post is a case-study in how we're not getting through to everyone we could be.

44
I don't see how not implementing the idea helps with the potential problems (delegates could be bribed to a different fork as is, no?)  I'd say go for it.

45
General Discussion / Re: How to attack Bitcoin Mining
« on: August 18, 2014, 08:20:37 pm »
When mining you don't know if you have the winning hash until after you submit it (sometimes not even then).

This is not quite true.  You always know when you have a winning hash, however (as far as I know,) this cannot be exploited.

Mining is just hashing headers and seeing if they're above the difficulty, however the header includes things such as every transaction to be included in the block.  This includes the 25 BTC reward to either the pool or you.  Since you compute the hash you always know before the pool whether it is above the difficulty or not.

So, if you're hashing for a pool and submitting occasional work, you need to set that part of the header to say that the reward should go to the pool if the difficulty is right.  Otherwise the pool has no reason to accept your shares.  If you do find a winning hash with the 25 BTC transaction going to the pool, you cannot simply change that one address because that will also change the hash and it will (almost certainly) no longer be above the difficulty.

I think Bytemaster's attack has to do with simply depriving the pool and yourself of the winning hash.

EDIT: O hay, Bytemaster is really quick.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6