Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bppsp1

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6
16
MemoryCoin / Re: I don't understand cryptsy's actions
« on: January 27, 2014, 03:33:03 pm »
Ive opened discussion with coinedup admin/owner directly.

Posting add this or that coin in forums isn't personal enough and easily ignored.

17
MemoryCoin / Re: I don't understand cryptsy's actions
« on: January 27, 2014, 03:14:00 pm »
Ive contacted coinedup but no response yet.

18
MemoryCoin / Re: New YAM version release
« on: January 27, 2014, 03:13:18 pm »
Been playing around with new k version and noticed few things.

1.) k version ART dropped from previous version 59000 down to 1500 , thats a huge drop not sure what benefits it would give.
2.) k version SPM/HPM is lower on sandy-bridge than on j version using AV=1 (havnt tried all, but AV=1 always turned out fastest in previous version)
3.) k version using different m: values doesnt seem to make any difference at all.
4.) k version fluctuate between 90-100% usage on each thread all the time where the j version pegged to 99.9-100% all the time.

19
MemoryCoin / Re: New YAM version release
« on: January 27, 2014, 01:49:29 pm »
I notice that the new version doesnt have a constant 99.9-100% peg on each thread, it fluctuates alot between 92-98 on each threads and rarely pegs at 99.9-100%

Is this by design, surely such fluctuations would kill extra hashrate ?

20
MemoryCoin / Re: I don't understand cryptsy's actions
« on: January 26, 2014, 08:29:50 pm »
Well it can only go up from the current price, not much lower until it reaches 0 so time to make a move on.

21
Good work.

Right now Memorycoin could do with just about anything new added to it. :)

If only we could get some drug users to start trading with it. Use Memorycoin to buy products that kills your Memory.

22
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] DwarfPool - MEGA WEEKEND-PROMOTION
« on: January 25, 2014, 04:24:49 pm »
A few posts up I explained exactly what is happening and why probability slowly goes out of the window the higher the concentration of one pool to total network hashrate.

Right now mmc.1gh.com have a near 100% hitrate on all blocks and proportionally this hitrate will reflect higher than the network hashrate percentage of a smaller pool.


23
MemoryCoin / Re: price going down and down
« on: January 24, 2014, 08:30:36 am »
Diff went down and made it just alot better for cpu miners.

All the gpu miners are rushing towards the scrypt coin daily bubbles making memorycoin that much better for cpuminers right now as it should be.

Just mine middlecoin then buy MMC. It's good for the coin!

MMC do need a network though so just buying and no mining is not a solution. ;)

Just dont sell into these rediculously undervalued market.

24
MemoryCoin / Re: price going down and down
« on: January 23, 2014, 11:00:12 pm »
Diff went down and made it just alot better for cpu miners.

All the gpu miners are rushing towards the scrypt coin daily bubbles making memorycoin that much better for cpuminers right now as it should be.

25
MemoryCoin / Re: [CTO] work status
« on: January 23, 2014, 01:19:09 am »
Stupid question, where is the faucet and how can I contribute to the faucet balance ?

26
MemoryCoin / Re: MMCBANK - Max's Mine Buys Mint MMC
« on: January 23, 2014, 12:33:14 am »
Sure I got few K to sell you but not at current totally under valued market ;)

0.0005 + 2% and you got a deal. :)

27
If you are a miner and care about the price going up then simply stop selling into buy orders and move your sell order up along with buy orders that will inevitably move up trying to get people to sell into them.

Ive noticed the effect happening quite quickly, when there is a big gap between sell and buy price, the buyers after just a few minutes move their buy order up just under the lowest sell order and this effect causes outside buyers to simply buy whatever the lowest sell order is.

Rinse and repeat, move sell orders up and dont sell into buy orders.

Right now it seems that most of the potential sellers on bter is mining or active on this forum, the price will move up as long you dont satisfy the rediculously cheap buy orders proposed atm.

28
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMC.1GH.COM - CPU/GPU mining
« on: January 22, 2014, 03:52:55 pm »
reorder could you add a 24hr earnings stat to the user page, makes it just so much easier to look at quickly to get an idea how good/bad the last 24hrs were and in general just to know what was earned in 24hr cycle.

29
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] DwarfPool - MEGA WEEKEND-PROMOTION
« on: January 22, 2014, 01:51:50 pm »
Wow thats quite utterly fked up whoever did that. :(

I guess there is always someone who tries to game people no matter the harm they cause, sigh.

30
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] DwarfPool - MEGA WEEKEND-PROMOTION
« on: January 22, 2014, 11:40:09 am »
The calc math is roughly correct Id say.

What I see is happening is quite simply LARGE pools "outluck" small pools on block hits.

Think about it like this, if you had 90 people flipping coins on one side as a team and 10 people on the other side and the rule is that whichever side have the highest percentage of heads/tails then the 90 people flipping coins will in the vast majority totally dominate the 10 people flipping coins except if you got constant same difficulty and unlimited time then it will even out but it would take many many years if you ask me.

That is not the reason. The small pool that only has 10 people also only splits the reward 10-way instead of 90-way.

The only reason people join pools is if chance of finding a block is so far into the future that by then the difficulty could drastically change and they could mine for a month and end up with nothing.

However with the HPM I have I could discover 7 blocks/day, I don't really need a pool.

The whole logic of low hashrate pools will even out over time vs high hashrate pools is entirely flawed. This would be valid if we were talking about constant block rewards and constant same difficulty.

The fact that block rewards gets reduce quite often and difficulty fluctuate quite often effectively will keep a low hashing pool at a disadvantage and lower earnings ALLWAYS because it will have much greater variance during difficulty/block reward periods.

Low hashrate pool would need the hand of GOD to assist them if they want to actually reap the same earnings over time which realisticly just wont happen no matter how you try and slice it.

This is unfortunate though, it would be great if all hashrates were balanced among pools for equal chance of getting blocks per difficulty/blockreward period but right now with Memorycoin the competition and interest is too low to sustain a fairly equal split across all the available pools.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6