Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bppsp1

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6
61
MemoryCoin / Re: The Pre-Mine Questions FreeTrade Won't Answer (Ongoing)
« on: January 19, 2014, 03:45:08 pm »
I am a bit late to the whole premine controversy but can someone just sum it up for me. Did freetrade only get 160 000 MMC and thats causing all this fuss ?

Look at the shit thats called Ripple with a few billion effective premine and central authority and backed by google, it is doing reasonably well and everyone is losing their fucking toys over 160 000 / $32000 worth of premine coins ?

If all this chaos is only because of voting power I guess there is some reason for it but still overcoming the 160k vote is fairly easy combining just a few big miners coin votes.

Please correct me if I am wrong or inform me of the actual total premine in case it is much higher than that.

62
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - GPU,CPU(yam) - The Awesomest Pool!
« on: January 19, 2014, 01:52:13 pm »
Have a look, something seems terribly wrong with the percentage per block.

http://mmcpool.com/en/user?wallet=MN1poSsTRKf4kgJ5UxyJfsYbyBqEg3zdrH


Yup the last 2 blocks looked closer to expected per block compared to pool hashrate.

This network hashrate graph is useless though: http://s4l1h.github.io/mmc/

Just looking at my hpm share percentage on mmcpool and my hpm share percentage on mmc.1gh pool the network hashrate is much closer if not above 100 000 hpm right now while that network hashrate graph shows declining hashrate below 50 000 hpm.

Basicly I am trying to make sense of expected returns within a difficulty adjustment range which should be possible to calculate however all available calculations is by far wrong and none of them resemble my personal results thus making MMC mining alot less attractive than the calculators/network hashrate graphs suggest.

63
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - GPU,CPU(yam) - The Awesomest Pool!
« on: January 19, 2014, 01:25:13 pm »
Right now I am at a minimum sending 33% of mmcpool.com submitted shares for each block but each block payout is no more than 12% shares for me.
What? For 33% your hashrate should be at least 7000-8000.

What is your wallet address?

Right now sending much less to mmcpool but here is my wallet address : MN1poSsTRKf4kgJ5UxyJfsYbyBqEg3zdrH

Have a look, something seems terribly wrong with the percentage per block.

64
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - GPU,CPU(yam) - The Awesomest Pool!
« on: January 19, 2014, 12:50:38 pm »
So there seems to be something really stuffed with share percentages that doesnt add up at all.

I notice the same on 1gh.com

Right now I am at a minimum sending 33% of mmcpool.com submitted shares for each block but each block payout is no more than 12% shares for me.

This is really messed up, I compared the top 50 displayed hashrates. Wether that is correct or incorrect shouldn't matter since I am comparing all the displayed hashrates along with my displayed hashrate on mmcpool.com

I am assuming everyone is showing these same low percentage shares per block which makes me wonder where is the additional percentages ie. For my own stats I am losing out on 20-23% of shares each block.

Something isn't right, there is effectively 20-23% of MMC taken from each block according to these details and the pool fee is suppose to be 3.5%

Please explain this.

65
MemoryCoin / Re: Pool payouts with zero fees causing BTER deposit issues
« on: January 18, 2014, 08:42:33 pm »
They lost my 1 BTC deposit yesterday, because the deposit address suddenly changed while I was refreshing the page waiting for the deposit to appear.

I contacted them via QQ, and they rectified the situation. You will not hear much back from support, however they seem to eventually take care of your problems.

I do NOT recommend miners depositing directly to a BTER address. That's way too many transactions to keep track of. Some of which probably got lost along the way.

I will try resolve this via QQ, apparently this is their english QQ support: QQ2795309276

Its not so hard for me to keep track of mining transfers to BTER, I just look on the blockchain that my BTER balance + traded history = blockchain total received on the wallet.

Right now I have a missing balance of 2100 MMC and its just accumulating as if every other deposits just gets ignored completely.

Right now my

66
I am spreading my farm across both pools to try and help balancing things a bit.

It only gets heavily lobsided when Mr. 30000HPM decide to crank up his botnet/gpu-cluster-fuk/university machines on mmc.1gh.com. :)

I will move a portion onto dwarfpool as soon as you offer actual worker stats, only seeing hashrate isn't enough.

67
MemoryCoin / Re: Pool payouts with zero fees causing BTER deposit issues
« on: January 18, 2014, 02:13:50 am »
Strange shit going on with bter deposits.

When I refresh page it shows deposit history of certain deposits that I am still waiting to clear then I refresh again and it shows a different history.

Same happens when I refresh page to view current account balance, this is seriously fked up.

How can I get in touch with these people, Ive tried emailing both admin and support email but never get any reply.

68
Any specific reason you disabled hyper-threading on that cpu ? You are losing out on some freebee hpm by disabling it.

The i5-2500k doesn't really support HT.

Doh, didnt read the I5 part, thats what happens when you speed read important details haha.

69
MemoryCoin / Pool payouts with zero fees causing BTER deposit issues
« on: January 18, 2014, 01:21:53 am »
As the topic states, seems now BTER mmc deposits is taking forever to clear due to pools not adding a single fee to payouts.

Can pools really be this hardup, the fees is minimal, just add a fee because these transfer delays is rediculous now.

Not sure when this exactly started or if its due to the new zero fee changes but it sure as hell isn't helping.

70
MemoryCoin / Re: YAM Miner and solo mining
« on: January 17, 2014, 08:27:50 pm »
I like pools that don't require registration. I'm going to get something going over the weekend.

I may even have a strategic twist to benefit the coin.

Keep us in the loop, would definitely move my farm to something other than the big pools as long as it is stable.

I tried moving 3000hpm over to gpool a day ago and the pool fell apart, doh.

71
Any specific reason you disabled hyper-threading on that cpu ? You are losing out on some freebee hpm by disabling it.

72
MemoryCoin / Re: Accuracy of http://agran.net/memorycoin2_calc.html ?
« on: January 17, 2014, 07:29:23 pm »
As an example, right now and for most of the day network hashrate is ~64000 while I am sitting at between 9000-13000 so using even just 9000 at a rate of 10 blocks average per hour I should earn at a bare minimum 1.4 blocks per hour / 317 MEG per hour. This is not at all the results I am seeing, I am averaging around 0.7-0.9 blocks per hour.

I cant figure out why there is such huge differences, clearly somewhere something is wrong or the pools operate at huge hidden fees.
LOL ))
What blocks did you find?

The estimate is from pooled mining, please try keep up with details in this thread. :)

73
MemoryCoin / Re: Accuracy of http://agran.net/memorycoin2_calc.html ?
« on: January 17, 2014, 07:28:03 pm »
Pools hashrate meter is SUPER inaccurate because it is based on shares per min.
MMC network difficulty is constantly changing.
You should just mine the coin and forget about calculators.

Sadly some indication of daily earnings is important. Mining blindly without a care of earning potential isn't my cup of tea.

I only mentioned poolhashrates compared to the reported global network hashrate so I could get an indication of whats going on. Basicly all either both of them are completely wrong or one of them are correct, which is it ? :/

74
MemoryCoin / Re: YAM Miner and solo mining
« on: January 17, 2014, 07:25:16 pm »
Before I go and hit my head against a brick wall, is the yam miner capable of solomining at all ?

I dont really agree at all with payouts from the mining pools so would like to give solomining a go again but with yam miner since it has far superior hpm than any other miner.

Right now I have access to >10000hpm using yam miner which means solomining is a viable option, just trying to figure out what is the most practical approach to go that way.


I have about 4000hpm and am in the same exact boat - let's get this up and running and open source it. Alternatively - are you interested in setting up a pool together and set it to 0% rewards?

It is vital that we balance the network with more pools that are easy to setup.

So I don't reinvent the wheel - what's a good start for a getwork pool code for other coins? Is there one open sourced?

I am also not keen to reinvent the wheel, mmc.gpools.com got getwork with mpos going so thats prob the best first step to take.

75
MemoryCoin / Re: Accuracy of http://agran.net/memorycoin2_calc.html ?
« on: January 17, 2014, 01:18:03 pm »
Well I got some new info looking at mmcpool block percentage on portion Im testing there and on mmc.1gh.com

I put 4500 on mmcpool and the recent long block gave me 20% of the block meaning there was atleast 22500hpm grinding out that block at mmcpool.

At the same time mmc.1gh.com hashrate just looking at the frontend numbers shows over 60000hpm which give the 2 pools combined more than 80000hpm however the network hashrate graph shows the network at no more than 64000hpm.

All I can take from this is that the network hashrate graph is completely flawed and inaccurate or am I missing something heh.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6