Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dh

Pages: [1]
1
General Discussion / Re: So, who can tell me what happend in voting?
« on: July 31, 2020, 06:50:37 am »
Translation from the above link:

Quote
1. Voting weight decay mechanism (vote decay)

For newly registered accounts, the voting weight is zero, and the votes will only take effect after actively voting.

After each active update of the vote, the voting weight is updated to 100%, and it decreases by 12.5% on the 360th day, and then decreases by 12.5% of the total weight every 45 days, and the voting is completely invalid on the 675th day.

For proxy voting, the voting weights of the proxy and the proxy are superimposed according to the [multiplier relationship].

2
General Discussion / Re: So, who can tell me what happend in voting?
« on: July 31, 2020, 06:47:39 am »
Wtf, changes to vote recalculation even not mentioned in release notes? https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/releases/tag/4.0.0

The relevant commit is 7f4c08b031e1ac1c54967bc3d08f29e40649b88d

3
General Discussion / Re: Info about scamcoins?
« on: April 29, 2020, 08:07:49 am »
Recent reports was about WAZIRX asset.

I think it's good idea to implement different creation fee for top-level assets. Say, GATEWAY assets costs high fee, while further assets in same namespace (GATEWAY.XXX) costs much less. So, each new scamcoin requires high fee and scammer can't reuse it's namespace, while legit gateway may have lots of assets cheap.

4
General Discussion / Re: Hello 👋
« on: March 16, 2020, 07:37:00 pm »
Currently bitRUBLE is best committee-owned MPA, as it's retain original MCR=1.75 and MSSR=1.1.

5
General Discussion / Re: ANN: HONEST Market Pegged Assets
« on: February 08, 2020, 10:41:20 am »
Bitassets are "good" for borrowers because they made a protection rules for themselves. Oppositely, HONEST assets are advantageous for holders and "bad" for borrowers: high MSSR and quick force settle with 0% offset. I see no good reasons for borrowers to switch from less restrictive assets to more restrictive. What can incentivize borrowing of HONEST? Maybe BTS selling liquidity with meaningful discount.

6
Some information for dexbot users. I was involved in dexbot development in 2019, and as DEXBot funding was ended in December, I continued some developments in own repo https://github.com/bitfag/DEXBot.

Changes published:
* Recommended installation way via `pipenv`
* New relative MM strategy Flexible Orders
* Fixes to Staggered Orders strategy
* Stop Loss feature in Staggered Orders strategy
* Fresh bitshares libraries used (RPC error messages are shown in details)
* Some refactoring

New features developed privately and not published:

* ccxt-based liquidity mirror arbitrage DEX<->CEX: the bot places maker orders on DEX, and if filled, executes a corresponding trade on CEX, making desired profit
* Trailing Strategy: implements Trailing Buy, Trailing Stop Loss, Trailing Take Profit features. This is an implementation of commercial my3commas "Smart Trade" strategy for BitShares.

Contact me if you're interested in custom strategies etc.


7
General Discussion / Re: ANN: HONEST Market Pegged Assets
« on: January 21, 2020, 05:42:46 am »
You cannot use MSSR > MCR, otherwise an asset will be globally settled immediately. GS comes when least CR position == MSSR

Correction:
Quote
  /**
   *  let HB = the highest bid for the collateral  (aka who will pay the most DEBT for the least collateral)
   *  let SP = current median feed's Settlement Price
   *  let LC = the least collateralized call order's swan price (debt/collateral)
   *
   *  If there is no valid price feed or no bids then there is no black swan.
   *
   *  A black swan occurs if MAX(HB,SP) <= LC
   */

8
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP59:Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.02
« on: February 27, 2019, 05:48:40 pm »
Instead of reducing MSSR affecting all borrowers, it is possible to implement dynamic individual MSSR dependent on CR of the position. Here is the example:

- borrowers with CR=1.75 got margin called with MSSR 1.01
- If CR dropped to 1.7, MSSR is 1.05
- CR = 1.6 -> MSSR 1.10
- CR = 1.5 -> MSSR 1.20
- CR = 1.4 -> MSSR 1.30
- and so on

I think you got the idea. So, borrowers are always incentivized to maintain higher CR. Undercollaterized positions will create an acute price pressure and stimulate arbitrage.

9
General Discussion / Re: Review of OMO
« on: February 17, 2019, 07:18:03 pm »
I have a better idea. Forget about OMO and turn off market fees on bitassets.

10
bitsharescan.com has a bug: it may improperly detect maker/taker accounts in account "Trade history" tab.

In trade history it shows 2 trades in one block, one of them is selling to self:

Code: [Select]
cryptobridge-marketmaker sold to cryptobridge-marketmaker
0.295878
BRIDGE.YOKE
0.000002
BRIDGE.BTC
0.00000676
BRIDGE.BTC


cryptobridge-marketmaker sold to derop12
0.000002
BRIDGE.BTC
0.295878
BRIDGE.YOKE
147 939
BRIDGE.YOKE

In the trx details we can see there is only derop12/cryptobridge-marketmaker orders matched:

Code: [Select]
1
Fill order
jbjz1 paid 10.4087755 BRIDGE.MARC for 0.00102006 BRIDGE.BTC
0.00204
34 392 408
13:23:57 UTC
2019-01-28
2
Place order
cryptobridge-marketmaker wants 10.3634485 BRIDGE.MARC for 0.00102006 BRIDGE.BTC
0.00578
34 392 408
13:23:57 UTC
2019-01-28
3
Place order
cryptobridge-marketmaker wants 0.00108282 BRIDGE.BTC for 10.3634485 BRIDGE.MARC
0.00578
34 392 408
13:23:57 UTC
2019-01-28
4
Fill order
cryptobridge-marketmaker paid 0.00102006 BRIDGE.BTC for 10.4087755 BRIDGE.MARC
2.08175
34 392 408
13:23:57 UTC
2019-01-28

11
General Discussion / Re: please restart BSIP42!!!
« on: December 06, 2018, 08:35:00 am »
Quote
2. please vote against witnesses who are feeding manipulated prices.

I would like to vote for backup witnesses who provide correct feeds, but unfortunately I cannot find an easy way to obtain feed data for backup witnesses.

Only Active Witnesses can provide price feed for BitAssets.

The goal is to vote for some backup witnesses to make them replace some active witnesses who doesn't provide correct feeds.

12
General Discussion / Re: please restart BSIP42!!!
« on: December 05, 2018, 05:01:52 pm »
Quote
2. please vote against witnesses who are feeding manipulated prices.

I would like to vote for backup witnesses who provide correct feeds, but unfortunately I cannot find an easy way to obtain feed data for backup witnesses.

Pages: [1]