Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - biophil

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 59
226
Technical Support / Re: Where did my BitGold market trade went?
« on: December 05, 2014, 03:17:13 pm »
Quote from: JoseUribeZ on December 05, 2014, 02:58:53 pm
I get the following, but the funds are still not in my wallet  :(
>> wallet_recover_transaction b3463c4a

10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
has_deposit:
    {}
    bitshares  wallet.cpp:2195 recover_transaction

    {}
    bitshares  wallet.cpp:2254 recover_transaction

    {}
    bitshares  common_api_client.cpp:2003 wallet_recover_transaction

    {"command":"wallet_recover_transaction"}
    bitshares  cli.cpp:556 execute_command

Did you regenerate keys and rescan and all that stuff? If so and you still get the error, then we may have to get a dev in here to interpret it.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2


227
Technical Support / Re: Where did my BitGold market trade went?
« on: December 05, 2014, 03:14:39 pm »
Quote from: JoseUribeZ on December 05, 2014, 02:33:49 pm
ok, will check it out.

@biophil, how do i get a cool robot like yours?

Go to robohash.org (or .com, I don't remember) and type in your account name.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2


228
Technical Support / Re: Where did my BitGold market trade went?
« on: December 05, 2014, 02:27:17 pm »
Quote from: JoseUribeZ on December 05, 2014, 02:17:39 pm
I ran the command, nothing

My recent transactions show

FROM  TO   MEMO   AMOUNT   FEE   DATE
BID-e2ee4704 UNKNOWN

867.78799 BTS
0.5 BTS   November 7, 2014 at 6:21:30 AM EST

But inside my account don't see the transaction, nor the balance of 867BTS

any more suggestions?

Ah, the dreaded UNKNOWN transaction. By chance, did you back up your wallet on one computer and then try to use the wallet on another computer? If so, Bitshares doesn't work terribly well like that.

Try these steps, they fixed it for me when I had a missing balance and UNKNOWN transactions showing up in my wallet: http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/Best_Practices/RecoverFunds
It's kind of a pain, but go through the whole How To list and ask back here if they don't work.

229
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD supply spike on Nov 26
« on: December 05, 2014, 01:24:24 am »
Quote from: starspirit on December 05, 2014, 12:02:02 am
I only just noted from bitsharesblocks.com that on November 26 the supply for bitUSD appeared to jump significantly from around 1m units to over 1.6m units, and then since has dropped below 1m units again. Anyone know what drove this?

It was probably the owner of that huge margin order buying up enough bitUSD to cover, thus spiking the supply way up, and then covering his order, thus dropping the supply back down.

This is just me guessing; I haven't actually looked into it at all.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2


230
General Discussion / Re: Good coin guys, congrats!
« on: December 05, 2014, 01:19:46 am »
Quote from: jannnic on December 04, 2014, 11:15:02 am
This is really a nice coin you made there! I thought that Worldcoin would take over for quite a while but this looks much better now. Fuck worldcoin I go with this now!

I have to say though that that BitUSD subproject concerns me a bit. I am with Ron Paul when it comes to the FED. But Bitshares all the way!

And as far as I'm concerned you go a bit of track with what that toast guy is doing with his dns stuff. bytemaster don get distracted here! ask your brother he will know...

Welcome! What bothers you about bitUSD? I hate to break it to you, but market-pegged assets like bitUSD aren't a subproject, they're THE project. Or at least they're the original project. Bitshares probably wouldn't exist without them.

And DNS also was one of the original core ideas in the bitshares world. Could you explain a little more why you think toast is off track?

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2


231
General Discussion / Re: MarketVolume not "fair"
« on: December 04, 2014, 03:47:02 pm »
Quote from: xeroc on December 04, 2014, 08:59:00 am
Having a forced cover after 30 days means that the whole "market cap" of N x 1bitUSD (N beeing the bitUSD supply) ... will have to trade ..
Thus .. on average .. we will have a daily volume of

    SUPPLY / 30

That's nice as people take "volume" serious for trading .. but not nice as it makes it "unfair" to compare to other schemes .. say nuB.. na .. who cares  8)

Haha, I wouldn't worry about being too fair to NBT... after all, they are the kings of massive automated volume.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2


232
General Discussion / Re: [DAC Proposal] Anything On-Demand - Genie
« on: December 04, 2014, 03:39:53 pm »
Quote from: islandking on December 04, 2014, 02:30:16 pm
Cool idea, but isn't this more of a "vending machine" DAC?

There was a lot of hate towards vending machine DACs about 6 months ago, and I could never figure out why. Even if luckybit's idea is a vending machine (pretty fancy vending machine, if you ask me), why does that disqualify it from being interesting?

If it can benefit simultaneously from automation and decentralization, then it's a good business to DACify.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2


233
General Discussion / Re: Do shorts fill below the price feed?
« on: December 04, 2014, 12:00:14 am »
Quote from: toast on December 03, 2014, 10:20:23 pm
Quote from: arhag on December 03, 2014, 10:12:28 pm
Quote from: toast on December 03, 2014, 09:30:19 pm
Remember BM thinks backwards so actually it is

max(feed_price, ask_price)

And apparently the code is written in this backwards way! Thanks for the clarification. It took me half a minute after reading Markus's post to realize the code didn't have a huge bug.

It just doesn't make sense. It is one thing to say the price of BTS is X BitUSD. But saying the price of BTS is Y BitOil (in other words, the price of 1 BTS is Y barrels of light sweet crude oil) is just weird.

Not to mention that every single UIA market is "asset per dollar"... Apparently it was more logical to make USD the last reserved asset to maximize number of "correct" market orientations in backwards-land than it was to have a normal orientation and order assets by importance (BTS > USD > BTC > all later assets)

I know how design decisions go; you don't always think them through as well as you should, and then they're set in stone. But how BM ever thought this would be better is a complete mystery to me. This is probably the best evidence we have that "bytemaster is only human." :)

234
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] BitShares-PTS Dry Run #1 launched
« on: December 03, 2014, 11:03:21 pm »
The actual upgrade will use snapshot from Dec 14 though, right? 

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2


235
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Proposal] Show interest rate of bitassets in GUI
« on: December 03, 2014, 07:34:38 pm »
Quote from: svk on December 02, 2014, 03:44:58 pm
Quote from: biophil on December 02, 2014, 03:28:43 pm
Agreed. This would be useful on bitsharesblocks also. Hint hint, svk.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

Definitely, this isn't already available from the client though is it? Meaning is it something that needs to be calculated based on transaction fees for a given asset over a given period or does the client already tell us the interest rate for each asset?

Run get_asset, and then divide: (collected_fees)/(current_share_supply).

236
General Discussion / Do shorts fill below the price feed?
« on: December 03, 2014, 07:16:46 pm »
For a brief period today, BitCNY was trading at a huge premium to real CNY. I entered a couple small shorts to try to take advantage of the opportunity, and it looks like it worked, but I wanted to get it from a dev:

When a bitAsset trades at a premium, do shorts fill at the price feed, or do they fill at the ask price (which is below the price feed)? Obviously, it is absolutely crucial that the answer be the latter. It's not usually been an issue for BTS because most of the time, BitAssets trade at a discount. But if they suddenly start trading at a premium, it's essential that people can profit by short selling.

237
General Discussion / Re: User Issued Asset Upgrades
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:25:33 am »
Quote from: kokojie on December 02, 2014, 10:44:29 pm
Quote from: bytemaster on December 02, 2014, 03:30:06 pm
Quote from: joele on December 02, 2014, 10:51:57 am
Quote from: kokojie on December 02, 2014, 04:18:21 am
Can Issuer pay dividends yet?

+5% Mass payment module.

This would be very expensive to implement a primitive for.   You can send out 1000 transactions or use a "send many" to group them into manageable sizes.   Having an operation do that would be too expensive.

I believe at least 80% of user issued assets would require regular dividend payments, when I was playing with crypto stocks on BTCT, I believe 99% of assets were paying regular dividends. Therefore this is a needed feature, no matter how technically expensive, you need to figure it out.

This could be automated client-side quite easily, I suspect. Any reason that wouldn't be sufficient?

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2


238
General Discussion / Re: OIL. Let's get this asset going.
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:19:26 am »
Oil will be interesting, at today's prices it may even stand a chance of trading at a premium to real oil, which would be a first for a bitAsset.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2


239
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Proposal] Show interest rate of bitassets in GUI
« on: December 02, 2014, 03:28:43 pm »
Agreed. This would be useful on bitsharesblocks also. Hint hint, svk.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2


240
General Discussion / Re: Rand Paul Coin wants to use DPoS
« on: November 27, 2014, 03:43:18 pm »
Quote from: rpcddev on November 27, 2014, 11:54:50 am

There has not been much of a presence here by me. I wish to wait until I have a testnet and then a forum will be useful. Until then bitcointalk announcement thread works fine and the pts forum.

Could you put up a link to the discussion on the PTS forum?

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2


Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 59

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 23 queries.