Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - wsnnwa

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
31
Sorry to report that the shares per minute rate has dropped down heavy from about 30 a min to 5 now
You might wanna take a look at it

Keep up the good work

Be^5r made a change to reduce server load, this isn't due to the miner.

32
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 12, 2014, 03:31:27 am »
Seriously??? I know the 290X is a wee bit faster than the 290 (more shaders) but I've over clocked
my 4 x 290's to 1125/1350 and running -t 0,1,2,3,4 -a 1 and only getting 12300 c/m and 46 sh/m.
Is the 290x really THAT much faster or are we seeing a big difference between using clpts on linux
versus windows? If it weren't for the over clocking ease of windows I would definitely be on linux!!

Got Ubuntu installed on my second rig, this time I decided to try out some OC. I used one 290X for this test, clocked at 1150/1400. Only Running -t 0,0, no gains noticed from -a.

[STATS] 2014-Feb-11 19:49:25 | 4582.29 c/m | 17.71 sh/m | VL: 62 (100.00%), RJ: 0 (0.00%), ST: 0 (0.00%)

Yes seriously. clpts runs better on Linux. I was only getting about 3000cpm per 290X on Windows, around 3200 if I overclocked.

I just created some shell scripts, one sets both GPUs to 1150/1400 and the other sets my fans to 100%. I have one that also prints the GPU temp, but I don't know how accurate that is lol.

33
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 12, 2014, 12:53:15 am »
Got Ubuntu installed on my second rig, this time I decided to try out some OC. I used one 290X for this test, clocked at 1150/1400. Only Running -t 0,0, no gains noticed from -a.

[STATS] 2014-Feb-11 19:49:25 | 4582.29 c/m | 17.71 sh/m | VL: 62 (100.00%), RJ: 0 (0.00%), ST: 0 (0.00%)



34
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 11, 2014, 05:30:28 am »
Wow that took forever, damn kernel issues followed with power issues....

Anyway, here are my Ubuntu results. R9 290X (1040/1250)

GPU 1 - [STATS] 2014-Feb-11 00:27:11 | 4153.40 c/m | 16.60 sh/m | VL: 119 (100.00%), RJ: 0 (0.00%), ST: 0 (0.00%)

GPU 2 - [STATS] 2014-Feb-11 00:21:54 | 4237.20 c/m | 16.20 sh/m | VL: 26 (100.00%), RJ: 0 (0.00%), ST: 0 (0.00%)

Decided to run one command line on each GPU with 2 threads each just to measure individual performance. I'll run  -t 0,0,1,1 next.

This is a 1000cpm change over my Win7.64 Mining rig with the same specs.

Thanks a lot NaN!!

I'll send you something tomorrow :D


35
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 10, 2014, 03:18:22 pm »
Sometime within the next couple days I'm going to give Gentoo (or another distro) a try and see if I get any performance improvements.

Currently - 290X (1150Mhz/1375Mhz) - ~3200 cpm on Win7.64

36
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 09, 2014, 10:27:26 pm »
R9 R290, Catalyst 13.12, Powertune +20%, GPU@1025MHz and RAM@1250MHz with Linux-v0.1.4 running -a 0, two threads per GPU and no other load. So far, no one was able to reproduce this in Windows but it should be possible because even a 280X easily hits more than 2700cpm. Still wondering because yesterday a user with 2 R9 290X reported only about 6100 cpm.

I tried two threads per GPU and still only managed ~6100 with 2x R9 290X @ 1040MHz/1500Mhz

37
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 09, 2014, 07:52:41 pm »
R9 R290, Catalyst 13.12, Powertune +20%, GPU@1025MHz and RAM@1250MHz with Linux-v0.1.4 running -a 0, two threads per GPU and no other load. So far, no one was able to reproduce this in Windows but it should be possible because even a 280X easily hits more than 2700cpm. Still wondering because yesterday a user with 2 R9 290X reported only about 6100 cpm.

I think I'm going to try out Linux and see what my 2x 290X get on it. I currently get ~6100 cpm on Windows with your new version.

Edit: Actually, I was only running 1 thread per GPU. So each was netting me about 3050 cpm. I'm going to try out two threads per GPU next.

GPU's@1040MHz and Mem@1500MHz

38
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 04, 2014, 01:41:49 pm »
yeah, my 290X makes 2637 cpm / 1100 GPU / 1475 RAM
OC with afterburner
very good software: NaN :)
oh - i have some new numbers with my 290X:
1165 core / 1475 memory / 210 watt / 58 °C / watercooled
gives marvelous 2784 cpm

Good overclock you have there, I have a couple 290X which I will try to get to run at 2700 cpm on air. It should be doable, but I foresee temps >70.

39
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 03, 2014, 04:14:32 pm »

Here are some numbers of my cards:
HD 7850:  930 cpm
HD 7950: 1815 cpm
R9  270: 1115 cpm
R9 270X: 1265 cpm
R9 290X: 2535 cpm

It's very strange that my 3x Asus 7850 could just run with about 700 cpm, even less than your one card. I tried new driver, it still doesn't work normally. Could you please help me find the solution? My English is not very good, hope you could understand me!
The miner does not work well with just 1GB RAM. Under Linux it won't work at all and under Windows it is slower than cards with more than 1GB RAM but I guess 700 cpm vs. 930 cpm is not bad for 1GB RAM
hi Nan, so I understand now. I won't use my 7850 to mine PTS, just use 270x to mine. And 700 cpm are my 3x 7850's speed....that's awful.

So you get 700 cpm TOTAL for all three 7850?

Have you tried running 3 instances, 1 for each GPU?

40
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit v1.0e - PTS GPU miner for Windows
« on: January 30, 2014, 03:32:21 am »
I ran arCUDAminer 1.0d for ~45 minutes and my c/m settled right below 1600. I ran arCUDAminer_cm35_highperf.exe



I also ran arCUDAminer 1.0e for 20 minutes, same results. I also ran arCUDAminer_cm35_highperf.exe



Normal arCUDAminer.exe on 1.0e gives me the best result from your miner, ~1800 c/m.


41
What's going on with it saying 'mining for 2000 seconds for mining Shiney Coins for user'. Everytime I start this thing. That's over half an hour. Am I mining for you or me?

That's for you. It runs on a cycle of 40 seconds for developer and then 2000 seconds for you.

42
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit v1.0d - PTS GPU miner for Windows
« on: January 29, 2014, 02:40:53 pm »
I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.

There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.

Which miner are we talking about?

This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0.

What does 1.0d give?

~1500 c/m on 1.0d compared to ~2100 c/m on that other miner.

Below is your arCUDAMiner1d.



Below is the other miner.




Edit: Actually your 1.0c gives me more c/m than 1.0d, 1.0c provides ~1700 c/m. Screenshot below containing 1.0c.



Give it at least 45 minutes to stabilize

I will do that, but my system traditionally stabilizes within a couple minutes.

I will post my results later tonight.

43
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit v1.0d - PTS GPU miner for Windows
« on: January 29, 2014, 01:00:49 pm »
I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.

There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.

Which miner are we talking about?

This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0.

What does 1.0d give?

~1500 c/m on 1.0d compared to ~2100 c/m on that other miner.

Below is your arCUDAMiner1d.



Below is the other miner.




Edit: Actually your 1.0c gives me more c/m than 1.0d, 1.0c provides ~1700 c/m. Screenshot below containing 1.0c.


44
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit v1.0d - PTS GPU miner for Windows
« on: January 29, 2014, 12:21:59 pm »
I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.

There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.

Which miner are we talking about?

This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0.

45
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit v1.0d - PTS GPU miner for Windows
« on: January 29, 2014, 04:07:07 am »
I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.

There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4