can you specify some details, like: % of rejects before and now, what miner/os are you using?

is somebody else seeing effects like this?

the (security) changes i've made shouldn't result in more rejects. but if you encounter reconnects, that could be the effect of the changes yesterday.

- xolokram

As of the time stamp on this message, I restarted my clpts miner and after 30min rejection rates appear to be my normal 1.5% rate... however they were higher when I checked the miner earlier... I almost want to say the spike in rejects seems to chime in with the spike in users added to the pool...

After letting the miner run for a while, I am now noticing the rejects are starting to climb again... already up to 4% and rising... (10min later its down to 2% again, it seems to be all over the board today)

clpts 0.1.4
windows 8.1 64bit

seems ypool is having issues the last 24 hours with downtime and people are jumping all over with their miners... someone there mentioned another DDOS attack on things causing issues...

Quote from: Darkbane on February 21, 2014, 02:26:50 pm

Quote from: maddi on February 21, 2014, 02:07:36 pm

when i put -t 0,0,1,1,2,2 .. the miner always crash

what GPU is your monitor plugged into... try running only one thread on that GPU... have you undervolted the cards? have you overclocked the cards?

i think its on my first gpu? how can i know that where did i plugged it?

yes my cards is undervolted

overlocked? no its not bcoz i didnt know how

If you have undervolted your video card, that is the MOST likely reason why the miner keeps crashing when trying to run multiple threads as it requires more power, but you can't provide it since you've lowered the voltage, the display drivers stop working and the miner does as a result... or one card will stop working while the others continue to run... I went through that exact experience when I was trying to find the best voltage to use... you simply need to increase the voltage on each card until you no longer have this problem.... each card may be slightly different with voltage requirements, but I would recommend raising all of them to an equal amount...

Quote from: NaN on February 21, 2014, 12:06:02 pm

@JohnD: You have to use Linux. It is some driver related problem... I still have no answer from AMD engineers.

Quote from: maddi on February 21, 2014, 11:42:07 am

i used 3x r9 280x dual x oc

is this good with collisions/min: 4950.?

no. it is bad. you should get about 10k cpm. Do you use Catalyst 13.12?

yes i used 13.12 now and its still 4500 collision..

here is my config

clpts_x86.exe -o ypool.net:10034:8080:8081:8082:8083:8084:8085:8086:8087 -u user.a -p 1 -a 2 -t 0,1,2


do i need to run multiple bat file? or its enough with 1 running bat file?


UPDATE:

now i use this -t 0,0,1,2

.. and i got 8100 collision ..... what now? do i need to overlocked? how?

-t is for threads

you should be using 0,0,1,1,2,2 on three 280X cards...

this runs two threads per GPU... any card with 3GB or 4GB can run two threads...

0 = GPU 1
1 = GPU 2
2 = GPU 3
3 = GPU 4
4 = GPU 5

if you have ONE video card with 2GB of memory it would be -t 0
if you have ONE video card with 3GB of memory it would be -t 0,0
if you have ONE video card with 4GB of memory it would be -t 0,0

if you have TWO video card with 2GB of memory it would be -t 0,1
if you have TWO video card with 3GB of memory it would be -t 0,0,1,1
if you have TWO video card with 4GB of memory it would be -t 0,0,1,1

if you have THREE video card with 2GB of memory it would be -t 0,1,2
if you have THREE video card with 3GB of memory it would be -t 0,0,1,1,2,2
if you have THREE video card with 4GB of memory it would be -t 0,0,1,1,2,2

if you have FOUR video card with 2GB of memory it would be -t 0,1,2,3
if you have FOUR video card with 3GB of memory it would be -t 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3
if you have FOUR video card with 4GB of memory it would be -t 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3

if you have FIVE video card with 2GB of memory it would be -t 0,1,2,3,4
if you have FIVE video card with 3GB of memory it would be -t 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4
if you have FIVE video card with 4GB of memory it would be -t 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4

R9 270 2GB = 1 THREAD PER GPU
R9 270X 2GB = 1 THREAD PER GPU
R9 270X 4GB = 2 THREAD PER GPU
R9 280X 3GB = 2 THREAD PER GPU
R9 290 4GB = 2 THREAD PER GPU (currently performs best under linux)
R9 290X 4GB = 2 THREAD PER GPU (currently performs best under linux)

AMD Catalyst software 13.12 is actually DRIVER VERSION 13.251.0.0
AMD Catalyst software 14.10 is actually DRIVER VERSION 13.350.1005.0 (BETA, NOT RECOMMENDED)

"Report problems with Invictus.io"

at the bottom of http://invictus.io/ the link to report problems does not work it 404's...

https://github.com/InvictusInnovations/invictus.io/issues?milestone=1&state=open

anyone else notice the nice jump in PTS value... 1 PTS to BTC to USD $15.46 using cryptsy to coinbase to cash out (at the time of this message, could change 5 seconds after I click post)... I wonder if people are gobbling up PTS waiting for the rumored DAC to hit at the end of the month... might explain why we saw a jump in mining on beeeeer...

Just a quick question, is there any purpose of holding PTS beyond Feb 28th?

I've read people on here saying that there will be a mad rush to sell after feb 28th. I don't know if I should believe that. Surely there must be some other benefits?

from everything I've been reading the past month... it seems this would come down to your strategy... do you sell the bitshares pts to get money today, or do you hold on to them for potential future bitshares they create, for which you would get a small share of for each pts you own... the quote from their website is below...

""BitShares PTS comes with a social contract to allocate at least 10% of the total shares in all future BitShare chains to those who hold PTS when the new chain is launched.""


so do you want money now, or later... will it be worth more now, or later... its the big question?

R9 270X 4GB   <--- 4GB version...

anyone with these 4GB cards, running two threads per card???

out of curiosity I decided to start doing it, and it works out pretty good... its got the memory (with room to spare) to run both threads and I've gotten a roughly 300cpm increase on each card, so I thought I would ask around... I had only been using the 280X cards with two threads, and was wondering why I never saw anyone mention the 4GB 270X cards with two threads, I know most 270 series come with only 2GB and won't do this, but for those with them, what are your results?

guess I will find out in 8 hours how well the results hold...

UPDATE :: well after 8 hours it seems I am getting a 428 cpm increase per card and holding... I guess you really can squeeze a lot out of a 4GB 270X card... almost 2000 cpm per card... (wish the other cards weren't 2GB now)

Quote from: newmine on February 17, 2014, 07:21:40 am

my .bat is  clpts_x86-64.exe -u xxxxxx.pts_1 -p xxxxx -t 0,1

everything was working fine the past few day until tonight. i was getting ~1750 col/m on these settings.

I am on a 7970, running clpts_x86-64 -u user.1 -p 1 -t 0 -a 3,3

it gets 2800 collisions/m

i guess it can probably go higher, but i haven't really tinkered with the algorithm settings any, or card settings

it's running @ 1100 core 1300 memory , 1.063v, 61oC in ~76oF ambient

ed: and i need to read the readme file, because i'm not even sure if i'm using the -t and -a modifiers properly, scratch.  i thought -t specified the device #

Yes you have -t and -a backwards... -t 3,3 -a 1

this will run two threads on the number 3 GPU... if you have another card to run this on, it might look like 3,3,4 to run two threads on GPU 3 and 1 thread on GPU 4... all depends what you have... I see you must be using gpu 0,1,2 for another miner? just have to get the right GPU ID for the right card...

I've found the -a 1 to be the best setting, but try all of them to see what works best for your card (0,1,2,3), -a 0 is more for the 290 crowd I guess... and yes please read the readme file it has the basic examples folks should be using.