181
General Discussion / Re: User Issued Asset Upgrades
« on: December 02, 2014, 04:26:54 am »
a big step for BTA ,great!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
please activate BTSX7xHUDYHYhcGnGtKKdfCGbgeLHuxxdApSLZ6Jz8tQ9zzn3a51Ru
It would be a good idea if merchants act as BTMs. Buy products from them and get Bitcoin in the same purchase. Merchants can sell Bitcoin or BitAssets directly to the customers.
Another idea is why not use BitUSD for change back? You go to CVS or whatever to buy whatever and you get some BitUSD back or BTC back?
As legendary as this thread is, let's try to phase it out in favor of faucets: faucet.bitshares.org
I suggest you lock this thread and start a new one with an appropriate title and the link.
As legendary as this thread is, let's try to phase it out in favor of faucets: faucet.bitshares.org
Thanks.
But when I want to register, it says that my name is already registered which I can understand as I used a common name.
But when I want to rename... it says that I cannot rename a registered account !! What ?
What should I do ? I am blocked !
HI, I need to register my account.
BTSX7N2Quq8gUiEHDBAEf4AzueTabktJUNDsTtRQDoBfS55qbjHzb4
Thanks for help!
账户公钥: BTSX8dmydRwKTzGxQCYdRUmf61FGSQELXbgCR3HrxLeNdYGnJYvikN
Maximising the positive perception of dilution and minimising the negative at first, is the way to a big valuation imo.
I think we are talking about different directions.all of healthy markets are the ones which have principles .
without suitable principles , 101 full paid seats could be taken quickly ,and that situation makes no sense for BTS.
The only principle that governs market choices is profitability. If 101 fully paid delegates are more profitable, then that's what will end up happening.
all of healthy markets are the ones which have principles .
without suitable principles , 101 full paid seats could be taken quickly ,and that situation makes no sense for BTS.
Principles are certainly important. Every stake holder has different principles.
BTS stake holders will not vote for situations that make no sense for BTS.
I don't see 101 delegate seats filling up anytime soon. I certainly will not be voting for that anyway and I would guess I'm not alone.
Large stake holders have the most to lose by recklessly voting for waste. I don't see it happening.