Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ryen123

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
16
Just for reference on mining speeds. My GTX 570 is running at 760c/m and my GTX 560 Ti running at 530 c/m.

17
Hi Dave, is there anyway to control intensity (utilization) of the card like cgminer? Example I wanna watch youtube video while mine at same time. Now very jerky.

18
I managed to compile it but got this error when try to run it.

Initializing.  Device has 965951488 free of 1341325312 total bytes of memory
Could not mmap hugepage, reverting to malloc: Cannot allocate memory

You can ignore that error - it was probably working. :)  I've committed an update that gets rid of it.  It's just informational (and unimportant) with the way the code works now.

  -Dave

Hi Dave, with that error the miner wasn't working, not doing anything. I made a change in makefile.unix line 142

nvcc -O3 -c -arch=sm_35 -o $@ $<

changed to

nvcc -O3 -c -arch=sm_20 -o $@ $<

Recompiled and now running flawlessly no errors. I just tried my luck with that change to reflect the compute capability of my card. Mine is gtx 570. Getting about 670 c/m.

19
I managed to compile it but got this error when try to run it.

Initializing.  Device has 965951488 free of 1341325312 total bytes of memory
Could not mmap hugepage, reverting to malloc: Cannot allocate memory

20
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 05, 2013, 02:47:44 pm »

btsblock is down, does anyone know another public protoshares blockchain explorer?



There is this other block explorer > http://coinplorer.com/PTS

21
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 03, 2013, 05:45:18 am »
Cannot connect. Server is down I take it?

Its up and running to me.

22
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: November 29, 2013, 11:25:51 am »
Well Mining first day, wondering how long the "block waiting for confirmations" needs usually ?

Also, since 5hours no block found within a pool ? Since yesterday usualle every 2h a block was found. Am I doing something wrong here ?


25930 2013-11-29 07:02:20 633 / 953583 -> 0.01774 PTS / 26.72 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25909 2013-11-29 04:19:25 217 / 365496 -> 0.01580 PTS / 26.61 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25898 2013-11-29 03:15:31 426 / 620415 -> 0.01828 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25884 2013-11-29 01:29:18 319 / 437467 -> 0.01941 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25873 2013-11-29 00:11:38 284 / 442919 -> 0.01707 PTS / 26.63 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25863 2013-11-28 23:08:34 352 / 509240 -> 0.01840 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25853 2013-11-28 21:47:36 308 / 482558 -> 0.01699 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25844 2013-11-28 20:39:34 808 / 1481120 -> 0.01452 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25809 2013-11-28 17:15:14 434 / 1270481 -> 0.00909 PTS / 26.61 PTS -> added

Read the 1st post

23
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: November 26, 2013, 01:02:32 pm »
Hi!
I'm a PST noob, can anyone explain me what VL, RJ and ST means? I think RJ is rejected...
This is a sample:
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Nov-26 13:41:57 | 113.7 c/m | 3.7 sh/m | VL: 79 (88.8%), RJ: 10 (11.2%), ST: 0 (0.0%)

There is a way to convert the share/minute (or collision/minute) to PST ?

Thanks!

VL = Valid, RJ = Reject, ST = Stale

24
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Pool 2.0 - One Day Rounds Proportional Payout
« on: November 23, 2013, 05:43:01 am »
Hello,

I have an 8 core cpu and 16 gb of ram.

./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0
Usage: ./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0 HOST PTS_ADDRESS [THREADS=HARDWARE]
Performing Benchmark...
HPM: 100.124

What should I put for [THREADS=HARDWARE]
to utilize cpu to the max?

thanks.

8 since you have an 8 core cpu.

25
Just my feedback on the v0.7. I compiled myself in ubuntu 13.10, it seems to run much slower on i7-4770k compared to v0.6 (about 1.1sh/m slower). But v0.7 runs faster on my i7-2600k. So weird.

Xolokram my own pc running native ubuntu 13.10 running v0.6 get about 190c/m & 3.9sh/m. After running v0.7, its about 160+c/m & 2.8sh/m. At the beginning of the miner it says "using avx/sse". It's quite a big difference.

Just to put things in perspective my other pc i7-2600k also running native ubuntu13.10 in v0.6 about 160c/m, in v0.7 about 190c/m. Much improvement but sh/m drops.

26
Just my feedback on the v0.7. I compiled myself in ubuntu 13.10, it seems to run much slower on i7-4770k compared to v0.6 (about 1.1sh/m slower). But v0.7 runs faster on my i7-2600k. So weird.

27
BitShares PTS / Re: Digital Ocean performance
« on: November 16, 2013, 07:58:08 pm »
Ran at DO previously, miner for coyote pool on 8cpu range from 60+ to 90+ hpm. Somehow varies quite abit during different times and instances.

28
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Pool 2.0 - One Day Rounds Proportional Payout
« on: November 16, 2013, 05:38:15 am »
Just a little feedback bytemaster. When you stopped the pool to transfer the wallet for payments, my mining clients timed-out and couldn't continue working. Lost a few hours. In the next mining client release, do let the client continuously try reconnect without any time-out.

It does do it continuously...  if yours gave up that is a bug I will look into.

Just to add-on, I'm using the linux version.

29
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Pool 2.0 - One Day Rounds Proportional Payout
« on: November 16, 2013, 04:52:47 am »
Just a little feedback bytemaster. When you stopped the pool to transfer the wallet for payments, my mining clients timed-out and couldn't continue working. Lost a few hours. In the next mining client release, do let the client continuously try reconnect without any time-out.

30
and everything else is auto? so lets say that after 50 days it finds a block it sends directly to the wallet the PTC?

yes

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5