Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - modprobe

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7
31
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 25, 2015, 04:21:52 pm »
@cgafeng: OK, the last sync block was uninitialized. Good catch. I've fixed that. :)

As to the inability to connect to the server... That's weird, particularly since it works some times and not others. Could it be the GFW tampering with the connections? Can you get the CLI output when it fails to connect? I'll look into the blobs appearing in the error messages; that definitely should not happen.

32
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 24, 2015, 11:01:20 pm »
Oh, I'm sure that TrojWare.Win32.Kryptik.BHBD is not safe at all, but cgafeng's zip does not contain that trojan. It's a false positive, which is very common in AV software. Note that of the 57 AVs which scanned the binaries, only one yielded a result. However, if you're unsure, you can replace the file which triggered the false positive, \bts_light_wallet_win1.0beta\bts_light_wallet_win\Qt\labs\settings\qmlsettingsplugind.dll, with one from an official Qt download.

33
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 24, 2015, 09:58:06 pm »
@cgafeng! What are you trying to do to these poor windows users?! Kryptik Trojans?!! ;)

Unfortunately, that's the nature of anti-viruses. Having studied them in some depth myself, I can say that they are incredibly stupid programs with a strong tendency towards false positives. I wouldn't worry about it.

34
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 24, 2015, 09:13:42 pm »
Thanks, cgafeng! Can you send me the full console output of the wallet, particularly after dragging down the transaction history list to refresh it? The errors you posted are just some errors qml-material spits out, but they don't actually affect anything.

35
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 24, 2015, 01:42:09 pm »
That would be great, @cgafeng! :) I think you're building on the develop branch. Change to the bitshares branch to build for the live network. You are correct; that line is the one that needs changing, but it should be set correctly on the bitshares branch.

36
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 23, 2015, 02:35:41 pm »
@riverhead: I can't reproduce that issue... What OS are you testing with? Does your passphrase have all 9 words?

37
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 21, 2015, 03:29:17 am »
Ubuntu folks: I think the dependency you're looking for, if trying to run the tests on the qml packages, is qtdeclarative5-test-plugin (Tested on 14.10)

38
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 20, 2015, 02:38:26 pm »
Hey, trog! Ubuntu et. al. have obfuscated packaging conventions which make chasing down dependencies difficult, but I think you're looking for the package qtdeclarative5-dev or qt5declarative5-dev or something like that. I'm pretty sure several of the Ubuntu packages have two 5's in the name, alongside several others which are similar but have only one 5, and of course they don't bother to document what the difference is, or, more importantly, what all you need to install if you just want to use software and don't want to devote yourself to the finer points of package naming convention. I've spent several long, annoying sessions trying to figure out how to build on Ubuntu. x[

The easy answer is, you can remove the test targets from the qml-extras and qml-material .pro files, and then you won't need the QtTest stuff. Perhaps an easier answer yet is to simply install Qt 5.4 to /opt or something and point QTDIR at that.

39
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 19, 2015, 02:07:58 pm »
script: Not really... The only deps it has that the full node doesn't have (unfortunately, the light wallet deps everything the full node does, due to the absurd interdependence of our libraries) is Qt 5.4 and those two QML libraries.

40
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 17, 2015, 11:04:10 pm »
Nevermind, @spartako. I found the bug, and fixed it. If you can do your own builds, you can get it by cherry picking a994c7c6d5da95a45d68f806aab48280734b56cc. Otherwise, you'll see it next time I release a binary.

41
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 17, 2015, 10:35:39 pm »
Great, thanks @spartako. It's designed to handle the system locale's numbers correctly, but apparently I missed something somewhere along the way. I'll dig a little deeper on this and see if I can figure out why it's failing. If you can collect the command line output when it does this, that would be helpful, but with luck I'll be able to reproduce it myself.

42
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:33:37 pm »
@matt608: Do you know how to run the binary directly from a command line, so we can get some output indicating what exactly the error is? I might be able to figure out how to get it working by google-fu alone. Also, is your Snow Leopard system 64-bit? If not, that's the problem. :)

43
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 17, 2015, 04:13:18 pm »
I have not tested on older versions of OSX. It's possible that it could be made to work, but until I have a machine or VM with an older OS, I can't test it or create builds which are confirmed working.

Is it easy to get VMs with old copies of OSX?

44
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 17, 2015, 04:04:02 pm »
@arhag: Yeah, I still like the margin of error TITAN introduces as well. That being said, if you register an account with a 64 character random name, you're getting pretty much the same benefit for far less complexity.

@matt608: I agree with you, those aspects of the faucet should be polished a bit. I'll pass your comments on to Valentine. :)

45
General Discussion / Re: Light Wallet Beta Release
« on: February 17, 2015, 03:50:08 pm »
That is correct. Which is pretty much the same amount of information I can data mine from TITAN transactions as well, especially if you vote with your stake. ;)

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7