firstly, it's not good to increase witness from this way.
secondly, it's a  danger action to vote like this, when you or BEOS get more vote power, BEOS could take over the chain by add many self account as active witness.
lastly, you have a misunderstanding about the vote mechanism, when there are only 21 active witness, you can't add even 1 witness when you have already vote for more than 21 witness.
on the other hand, you can't reduce even 1 witness when you have already vote for less than 21 witness.

so vote for the one you support, not a random junk account please.

Thank you for reminding me.

Quote from: sschiessl on May 02, 2019, 07:14:52 am

And here it is, thanks for your consideration!

https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2019-05-wirex-integration-cn

1. 发起投票：1.14.183 201905-wirex-integration
2. 理由：本提案可以增加 BTS 的应用场景，获得更多的新用户，值得尝试一下。
3. 方式： 由教授发起，同意的批准，不同意的不用做任何操作。

投票已通过

1. 发起投票：1.14.187   Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MCR of bitUSD to 1.6
2. 理由：dai(mcr=1.5) 给我们一个很好的例子，1.6的mcr能够提供更多更多的bitUSD，当然与央行不同，bitUSD的供应量取决于每个持有bts的个人。
3. 方式：由pts中国发起，同意的批准，不同意的，不做任何操作。

投票已通过

Hello dear bitProfessor, and team behind cn-vote,

I was wondering if you have any feedback or opinion on the Wirex worker?

https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2019-05-wirex-integration

This worker is also being translated, and will be posted as soon as possible. Sorry for posting in englisch.

Would you like to provide a Chinese version for discussion?

Hello dear bitProfessor, and team behind cn-vote,

I was wondering if you have any feedback or opinion on the Wirex worker?

https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2019-05-wirex-integration

This worker is also being translated, and will be posted as soon as possible. Sorry for posting in englisch.

Hi, I've heard your voice. It sounds great. I'll submit it it to cn-vote for discussion.

1. 发起投票： (1) 调整多签账户：观察员权重设为1，投票人权重设为10，阈值也相应调整为4/7。(2) 调整多签成员：新增 键盘敲很轻（bts-king110）bts邪教教主(bts7188）移除凡阳（h15208255013）, KUCCI(kkdskkds123）
2. 理由：观察员的权重调低，更能提现cn-vote的平民性。凡阳（h15208255013）, KUCCI(kkdskkds123）两位由于没有时间参与多签账户的事务，所以更换掉。
3. 方式：由教授发起，同意的批准，不同意的，不用做任何操作。

投票已通过

Quote

Please reconsider your decision. thul is emotional now. We should think about it rationally.

What means rationally ?Only accepting your point of view?

Also the claim i attack bitcrab personly is false.
I am questioning his actions being less effectiv than other possibilities where he doesn't accept any other point of view than his own.

What names have i been called when warning about OMO fund being used in a wrong time and decreasing CR to under 2 against community consensus ?
Bitcrab using the OMO fund to buy his own debt out at highest possible price also opened a big door questioning his action.

What names have i been called when instantly saying BSIP42 as it was will be a disaster as margin call walls will be created  ?

And saying now the lowering of MCR in a downtrend makes no sense is offensive since its against his agenda ?

Increase of price feed to kill the last possibile arbitrage is also ok for you ?
So once somebodies CR goes under 1.75 he needs to pray it will be no bigger downfall as it could lead to a total loss of his investment when he will be held hostage with his low CR as no margin calls will be eaten to push back his CR and lower risk of a total loss ?


Also making somebody accountable for his past actions is being emotional ?Or is it to prevent similar situations in the future?

You guys are very loud now but where were you when bitcny was near GS or tons of ex investors spitting blood because of their total loss ?

Bitshares has a clear leak of governance and it needs members who do their own research and have the guts to talk about these in public.

You claim its rational to spend 2 million BTS for 2 exchanges which have no real volume based on the worker bitcrab opened?What value does it bring to bitshares?

If you think that these questions are emotional rather than rational or that i ask them just because of bitcrab than you are wrong.

And if you think anybody can stop me from expressing my point of view or holding people accountable for their actions than i have to tell you again you are wrong.
I did it before being a proxy and i will keep doing it also when being not a proxy anymore.

But instead of attacking and trying to discredit me you should ask alt directly to join cn-vote

Quote from: bitcrab on April 26, 2019, 04:41:49 pm

不知道为啥alt要把自己的票代理给Thul3这个傻逼，代理给cn-vote也好得多啊。

At least be honest why the attack.

And just as a side note there are many big proxies questioning bitcrabs motivation but just being silent.
BEOS even not hiding they don't like bitcrab.
I voted for bitcrab as committee and witness before he misused the votes of ZB ( my personal opinion) which made that i revoked my votes so he won't have an advantage by using zb's votes for his own benefit against the rest of the community.
So claiming i'm in a personal vendetta against bitcrab is just false and a lie.

These are rational decissions based for the good of bitshares and my ethical view for the whole community.


Am going to reply on this one too

Quote

1.反对降低爆仓惩罚
2.反对调低最低抵押率
3.反对见证人喂真实价格
4.反对bitcny上交易所交易对
5.反对交易所参与社区治理和成为见证人
6.反对市值管理

I use google translator so i hope i understood these correctly

1.If you mean being against lowering MSSR of bitcny to 1.01 yes because it takes the possibility away to arbitrage margin calls
and release risk

2.Wrong i'm not against a reduce of MCR but i'm against a reduce in a downtrend.A decrease of MCR has its biggest effect at bottom or clear reversal signal

3.Thats your definition of real price feed.

4.I don't oppose.But adding bitcny to exchanges which have zero real volume what benefit will it bring to bitcny ?
Instead of wasting funds for scam exchanges with 99.5% fake volume it would make more sense to work on exchanges with real volume also when it means to go the longer route including legal letters.
Also thinking that any legit exchange will add liquidity for bitcny without providing a massiv amount of bitcny to that exchange for market making is just being naive.You would need first to create a fund to create these bitassets are sell a big amount of BTS to provide these bitassets to that exchange.
Thinking that an exchange opens your trading pair and it brings from itself liquidity is naive.

5.Yes i'm against it but accepted the other points of view as it was said they will make decissions based on the good for bitshares.What i don't accept is misusing these votes for the benefit of a single persons benefit.


6.Please clarify

This is not a personal attack. I apologize if you feel personally attacked. In the meantime, I will continue to state my point of view. When discussing things, don't attack them personally.

Alt, do you support a thul3 that is just an emotional individual, regardless of whether BTS are alive or dead?