Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - toonces

Pages: 1 2 [3]
31
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] Anonymous, Geobalanced DwarfPool for Memorycoin (CPU/GPU)
« on: March 02, 2014, 03:22:50 am »
I tried with the latest M7n only in one node still same problem with dwarfpool.com

32
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] Anonymous, Geobalanced DwarfPool for Memorycoin (CPU/GPU)
« on: March 02, 2014, 12:14:04 am »
Quote from: Delinquency on March 01, 2014, 03:27:33 pm

My CFG:
Code: [Select]
mine = getwork://address@moria.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
mine = getwork://address@erebor.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc

my CFG:
Code: [Select]
mine = getwork://address@moria.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
mine = getwork://address@erebor.dwarfpool.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
mine = getwork://address@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
mine = getwork://address@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc

so similar with yours.

Quote from: ManeBjorn on March 01, 2014, 03:29:38 pm
I have not gotten that at all.  In fact I just found two shares in a row with no problems while checking.
Maybe because I tried to swing too many server (only 18) at the same time and the ddos protection kick in.


33
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] Anonymous, Geobalanced DwarfPool for Memorycoin (CPU/GPU)
« on: March 01, 2014, 01:48:09 pm »
Is there an issue with the mmc pool ?
I got this error:
Code: [Select]
[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301344] MMC Agg. SPM: 20.707, HPM: 22.377; Rnds C/I: 63/0, Don. C/I: 79/32; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 20.707/1.5215, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 22.159/1.3850 142 rnds AV=2, ART=43322
[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301370]   moria.dwarfpool.com: Failure, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301375]   erebor.dwarfpool.com: On-line, Shares Submitted 17, Accepted 0
[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301379]   work.mmcpool.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-03-01 14:05:42.301382]   mmcpool.1gh.com: Idle, Shares Submitted 0, Accepted 0
[2014-03-01 14:05:42.776368] Found solution - 1610 / 1968 / 3093848796
[2014-03-01 14:05:42.776415] Share found!
[2014-03-01 14:05:43.171174] getwork: Rejected share, reason: false
[2014-03-01 14:05:44.919707] Found solution - 797 / 1968 / 2283288260
[2014-03-01 14:05:44.950842] Found solution - 2836 / 1968 / 2330885166
[2014-03-01 14:05:44.950891] Share found!
[2014-03-01 14:05:45.350686] getwork: Rejected share, reason: false
[2014-03-01 14:05:45.847514] Found solution - 3795 / 1968 / 1367379459
[2014-03-01 14:05:45.847563] Share found!
[2014-03-01 14:05:46.269629] getwork: Rejected share, reason: false

34
MemoryCoin / Re: CPU/GPU mining hardware comparison
« on: February 19, 2014, 01:11:35 am »
Dell PowerEdge R620 Dual Socket E5-2650 2Ghz 8 core 20M cache with 128GB RAM OS 64Bit Precise HPM 26.5

35
MemoryCoin / Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« on: February 16, 2014, 04:01:29 am »
Dell PowerEdge R620
Dual Socket E5-2650 2Ghz 8 core 20M cache with 128GB RAM OS 64Bit Precise

MMC Agg. SPM: 25.937, HPM: 26.591; Rnds C/I: 50616/11839, Don. C/I: 594/138; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 25.937/0.8333, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 26.592/0.8310 51210 rnds AV=1, ART=72203


OpenStack 16 VCPUs 32 GB RAM

MMC Agg. SPM: 21.829, HPM: 22.198; Rnds C/I: 44284/6043, Don. C/I: 474/48; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 21.829/1.3870, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 22.198/1.3873 44758 rnds AV=2, ART=43248

36
MemoryCoin / Re: Electrum for Memorycoin
« on: February 14, 2014, 05:06:48 am »
Quote
'http://xpool.xram.co/blockchain_headers.bin'
Is this the same with bootstrap.dat ?
So you can load it with memorycoind -loadblock ?

37
MemoryCoin / Re: Guide to Cloud Mining Memory Coin
« on: February 11, 2014, 04:17:56 am »
How many HPM can you get using the $10 package ?
Is it profitable ?

38
MemoryCoin / Re: New YAM version release
« on: February 10, 2014, 10:13:50 am »
using AV=0 it select AV=1
here is the result with 8GB
MMC Agg. SPM: 26.498, HPM: 26.528; Rnds C/I: 368/24, Don. C/I: 39/0; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 26.498/3.4012, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 26.494/3.3117 407 rnds AV=1, ART=18118

here is the result running on top of OpenStack with KVM using 16 VCPU flavor  same hardware as above
it select AV=2 on the fine tunning
with config memory of 16GB
MMC Agg. SPM: 21.923, HPM: 22.500; Rnds C/I: 3953/304, Don. C/I: 79/0; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 21.923/1.3885, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 22.500/1.4063 4032 rnds AV=2, ART=42666

39
MemoryCoin / Re: New YAM version release
« on: February 10, 2014, 03:10:03 am »
Thank for the great miner
Does this result sound ok ?

MMC Agg. SPM: 24.648, HPM: 24.159; Rnds C/I: 152/16, Don. C/I: 79/0; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 24.648/1.6044, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 24.105/1.5066 231 rnds AV=2, ART=39825

Its a dual socket E5-2650 2Ghz 8 core 20M cache with 128GB Ram Baremetal running 64Precise

using numactl as you suggested have about the same total performance.
using yam-sandy-bridge
Here is my cfg file:
Code: [Select]
threads = 0
mining-params = mmc:av=2&aesni=on&m=16384
mine = getwork://walletaddr@work.mmcpool.com:80:8880:8881:8882:8883/mmc
mine = getwork://walletaddr@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc
compact-stats = 1
print-timestamps = 0
change to av=1
got
MMC Agg. SPM: 26.581, HPM: 26.553; Rnds C/I: 2048/160, Don. C/I: 79/3; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 26.581/1.6854, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 26.554/1.6597 2127 rnds AV=1, ART=36152

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Page created in 0.198 seconds with 23 queries.