Thank you MrJeans!! That's a great script to work from!
I guess the main question of this should be "who" are we trying to target initially?
Mainstream users, Developers, miners, investors???
Ideally the answer should be all the above, but with limited time in the spots, a main target audience needs to be clarified.
IMO the marketing strategy should get broken down into "stages".
Stage 1 - Create add to market to Developers (get more potential application development into the Bitshare protocol)
Stage 2 - Create add to target Investors (AGS, BTC, PTS donations)
Stage 3 - Create add to target potential Miners (ROI potential, etc)
Stage 4 - Create add to target the Main Stream user (ex. go after just end users that aren't classified above)

Any input and suggestions/criticism would be awesome!!!

The sooner we get a clear vision, or direction with this; the more potent the ads can become!!! Must have a CLEAR message!

Hey guys,
I must be missing something? Usually this forum has good info and instructions to get something done, but I can't seem to find a reliable source/thread that explains the necessary steps to transfer from the old Protoshares-qt wallet to the new BitShares PTS Wallet.
Could anyone please help me out with any links for directions?
Thank You!

Awesome.
Thanks for the input!
Was curious what he was implying 

In one of the article links found in the EASY MONEY: posts....
I happen to read this one... http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2014/01/computer-corporations
What caught my attention was this quote..
"Lots of people will throw the term [DACs] around without really understanding it," says Mike Hearn, a Google engineer and Bitcoin developer. He prefers the term "autonomous agent" as a more useful metaphor. For such agents to exist, he says, "you need trusted computing to work well and it never has. So it'd require new hardware to be deployed."
Can anyone explain what he means by "require new hardware"?
Is he alluding that it's going to take more network hashing power, aka needing more miners? Or does he literally mean NEW HARDWARE?
Anyone on the inside track able to help out with this answer?
Peace!

We will probably launch a new TaPOS chain to replace PTS after it hits 2 million mined.

I'm sure this subject has come up in recent past? If not... for some reason, is there anything in the works to help incentivize miners and future PTS holds, outside of the 1% inflation. I'll try to break down my thoughts...
The whole concept of this experiment (PTS, AGS, BTS, etc.) IMO is attempting to mimic real life companies inside the digital world, being paid through shares and not "coins".
I thought I had read somewhere that PTS, at some point, would get eliminated from the market and BitX & AGS would take over. Is this true??
If it is... that's a shame. I think it would kill community trust, confidence and incentive to support any future, or current DACs.
I believe that the structure of this experiment should take on more of a "Berkshire Hathaway" structure. Where as there is one main "company" (PTS), and it has a stake in multiple sub-companies (AGS, BitX, etc.).
I know it's already set up this way, kind of, but without having a clear and concise backbone to this, I think its just shooting ourselves in the foot.
So in my mind, keeping PTS as the backbone and not injecting more PTS shares into the market after the 2million has been mined would be ideal. And it would help PTS rare in the market place, hence increasing value over time.
So, how do we keep the PTS transaction network up and running, idk...is it possible to piggy back PTS transactions with BitX and have BitX as the "currency" and mining incentive?
I'm probably incoherent  with what I'm saying, but with so many approaches and possible directions to this, and trying to sum up in 10mins.... well...

Thanks NoVaMiner for the reply.
I'm also using NaN's clpts v 0.2.2
Would you mind PM'ing me you batch settings (minus your username)? So I can see how yours set up.
I currently have the 7950's at 1025/1500, 7850 at 975/1300 and the r7's at 875/1000
I would think I could get these over the 6k c/m mark?