Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - wallace

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15
General Discussion / Re: Initial Witness Pay & Number of Witnesses
« on: September 22, 2015, 05:34:00 pm »
how about set a minimum number first such as 17 then increase the number according to the feed price(acutally this is the paramater of marketing cap)?

For example:
17 witness when 2.0 lunch.
if feed_price > 0.1, witness_number = 33
if feed_price > 0.2, witness_number = 51

if the system is strong, we don't need to worry about this delution and we can even set more than 101 witness, but the reality is we're still a little baby, we need to make us strong step by step

General Discussion / Re: Mumble Attendance Today
« on: July 24, 2015, 05:38:25 pm »
Forum: wallace
Mumble: wallace
BTS: manutd

General Discussion / Re: Brownie Distribution Update
« on: July 24, 2015, 02:13:41 pm »
|                    Wallace                     |                       Wallace                     |              manutd           |

Thanks Fuzzy!

General Discussion / Re: Good Press on Max Keiser
« on: July 20, 2015, 09:05:51 am »
Great job!

中文(Chinese) / Re: 中文区的寂静
« on: July 14, 2015, 10:11:30 am »

General Discussion / Re: Hangout Attendance (Brownie PTS)
« on: July 10, 2015, 07:46:58 pm »

i was there

I hold. And everytime I see the share price drop significantly, I buy (whatever I can spare). If this makes me a bagholder, than so be it. I invest in people and in the technology, and I believe in the core dev team. As long as they're working on the project the way they have been from the beginning, I will keep holding and buying. Maybe I'll lose everything I invested, that's the risk I'm willing to live with. On the other side, if the team delivers only partially on their promises (and I believe they will), then I'll be handsomely rewarded.

I don't believe in the "get rich quick" schemes. Building solid fundamentals, partnerships and creating organic growth takes time. Not six months to a year. More like five years. And Bitshares 2.0 will be working with other startups, increasing the probability of Bitshares success since any of these startup could go viral, thus increasing significantly Bitshares revenues. THAT will increase Bitshares market value.

Do Bitcoin, Litecoin or Dogecoin can boast to have a profitable business model? They have their utility as a store of value or token of exchange, but other than that they don't generate any profit.

A profitable business is not built on hype and speculation. It's built on solid metrics and business deals.

 +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5%

General Discussion / Re: Announcing Brownie Points (BROWNIE.PTS)
« on: July 03, 2015, 04:37:31 am »
BTS ID: manutd

I'm a share holder from PTS/AGS, tried and trying and will try to introduce BTS to the people around me and my family.


General Discussion / Re: Dan is doing the right thing .. again!
« on: July 03, 2015, 04:26:32 am »
You don't get it. You are worried about the crypto-community. We are building this for 99.999% of the population who don't know and may never know what crypto is. But they will still be able to enjoy the benefits of what crypto brings.

Exactly what I have been telling people.

yes.  +5% +5% +5% +5% +5%

... the gamers do not even have to understand cryptocurrencies, they are biz as usual but now using them and not even knowing.

People do not care about how a cell phone works, they just wanna snapchat dick pics. 

Likewise, explaining crypto to them is pointless, turn crypto into things they are familiar with and they will use it.

If  99.999% of the population won't understand or value decentralisation, doesn't that mean you're better off making a private centralised Cryptonomex blockchain which will be cheaper to run and which you and the developers have a much larger stake in?

people don't understand TCPIP doesn't mean people don't know how internet works
people don't understand crypto technology doesn't mean people don't know decentralization means what

I have used both seemlessly... for larger  btc orders I have used btc38 converting to cny then to bts for greater liquidity. can handle BTS buys as large 50BTC now (larger actually, but it's good to leave some safety margin against simultaneous buyers). I'd guess at this point we offer higher liquidity than btc38.

liquidity is not only about this, but also about how fequently the trades is, currenlty the best choice is still btc38 btc->cny->bts. I don't want to see most liquidity provided by 1 exchange, but that's the fact.

中文(Chinese) / Re: 随便说说
« on: June 16, 2015, 07:24:46 am »



General Discussion / Re: Cryptonomex? WTF is this?
« on: June 15, 2015, 06:25:24 am »

I think it's pretty crazy how ready people can be to read the worst into every statement and look for conspiracies everywhere. If you actually think BM and the rest of the team are looking for ways to stab BTS in the back then I'm not sure what planet you're from.

I think this is more than a matter of 'trust BM and team'.  We are talking about a real legal corporate entity called 'Cryptomex'.  It has its own set of Directors and Sharesholders.  We do not know if BM is a major sharesholder (with voting rights) in Cryptomex and therefore has a major say in it.  Nor do we know if BM would continue to keep his major stake in Cryptomex (and not sell his shares) if he was indeed a major shareholder.  Any other external person who takes over as a major shareholder can vote out BM and team, and change the direction of Cryptomex.  There is nothing to stop Cryptomex to develop a competing chain, or chains, since it owns all the rights to bitshares.  We need clarity on the structure of Cryptomex.

personally I will always trust BM, but Cryptonomex is a company, it will have complex conflicts of interest in future.

General Discussion / Re: Cryptonomex? WTF is this?
« on: June 14, 2015, 01:01:36 pm »
One can't help but wonder though. The devs are saying the licensing exists so that they can make money from it, because the income derived from BitShares has not been enough to sustain the dev team.

So, who else will be using graphene? And wouldn't most of these licensees then go on to develop direct competitors to BitShares?

Looks to me that for the devs it's a win-win situation, while for us, not so much.  [bitshares goes to the moon = win for devs, win for us | graphene sees mad adoption = win for devs, lose for bitshares/us]

What do you think Cryptonomex would do if tomorrow someone comes with $10mil to have them implement a direct competitor to BitShares ?
And could you really blame them for taking the offer?

"believe" is different from "have to believe", but now it seems we have no choice. that is the reality.

中文(Chinese) / 随便说说
« on: June 13, 2015, 04:12:49 pm »





1. BM从提出想法到实施的过程非常短
2. 社区的反对声音几乎得不到重视





Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15