Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - wallace

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15
136
General Discussion / Re: Initial Witness Pay & Number of Witnesses
« on: September 22, 2015, 05:34:00 pm »
how about set a minimum number first such as 17 then increase the number according to the feed price(acutally this is the paramater of marketing cap)?

For example:
17 witness when 2.0 lunch.
if feed_price > 0.1, witness_number = 33
if feed_price > 0.2, witness_number = 51
......

if the system is strong, we don't need to worry about this delution and we can even set more than 101 witness, but the reality is we're still a little baby, we need to make us strong step by step

137
General Discussion / Re: Mumble Attendance Today
« on: July 24, 2015, 05:38:25 pm »
Forum: wallace
Mumble: wallace
BTS: manutd

138
General Discussion / Re: Brownie Distribution Update
« on: July 24, 2015, 02:13:41 pm »
|                    Wallace                     |                       Wallace                     |              manutd           |

Thanks Fuzzy!

139
General Discussion / Re: Good Press on Max Keiser
« on: July 20, 2015, 09:05:51 am »
Great job!

141
中文(Chinese) / Re: 中文区的寂静
« on: July 14, 2015, 10:11:30 am »
潮水涨落,随波逐流者终将归于沉寂

142
General Discussion / Re: Hangout Attendance (Brownie PTS)
« on: July 10, 2015, 07:46:58 pm »
id:manutd

i was there

143
I hold. And everytime I see the share price drop significantly, I buy (whatever I can spare). If this makes me a bagholder, than so be it. I invest in people and in the technology, and I believe in the core dev team. As long as they're working on the project the way they have been from the beginning, I will keep holding and buying. Maybe I'll lose everything I invested, that's the risk I'm willing to live with. On the other side, if the team delivers only partially on their promises (and I believe they will), then I'll be handsomely rewarded.

I don't believe in the "get rich quick" schemes. Building solid fundamentals, partnerships and creating organic growth takes time. Not six months to a year. More like five years. And Bitshares 2.0 will be working with other startups, increasing the probability of Bitshares success since any of these startup could go viral, thus increasing significantly Bitshares revenues. THAT will increase Bitshares market value.

Do Bitcoin, Litecoin or Dogecoin can boast to have a profitable business model? They have their utility as a store of value or token of exchange, but other than that they don't generate any profit.

A profitable business is not built on hype and speculation. It's built on solid metrics and business deals.

 +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5%

144
General Discussion / Re: Announcing Brownie Points (BROWNIE.PTS)
« on: July 03, 2015, 04:37:31 am »
BTS ID: manutd

I'm a share holder from PTS/AGS, tried and trying and will try to introduce BTS to the people around me and my family.

Thanks.

145
General Discussion / Re: Dan is doing the right thing .. again!
« on: July 03, 2015, 04:26:32 am »
You don't get it. You are worried about the crypto-community. We are building this for 99.999% of the population who don't know and may never know what crypto is. But they will still be able to enjoy the benefits of what crypto brings.

Exactly what I have been telling people.

yes.  +5% +5% +5% +5% +5%

... the gamers do not even have to understand cryptocurrencies, they are biz as usual but now using them and not even knowing.

People do not care about how a cell phone works, they just wanna snapchat dick pics. 

Likewise, explaining crypto to them is pointless, turn crypto into things they are familiar with and they will use it.

If  99.999% of the population won't understand or value decentralisation, doesn't that mean you're better off making a private centralised Cryptonomex blockchain which will be cheaper to run and which you and the developers have a much larger stake in?

people don't understand TCPIP doesn't mean people don't know how internet works
people don't understand crypto technology doesn't mean people don't know decentralization means what

146
I have used both seemlessly... for larger  btc orders I have used btc38 converting to cny then to bts for greater liquidity.
http://Blocktrades.us can handle BTS buys as large 50BTC now (larger actually, but it's good to leave some safety margin against simultaneous buyers). I'd guess at this point we offer higher liquidity than btc38.

liquidity is not only about this, but also about how fequently the trades is, currenlty the best choice is still btc38 btc->cny->bts. I don't want to see most liquidity provided by 1 exchange, but that's the fact.

147
中文(Chinese) / Re: 随便说说
« on: June 16, 2015, 07:24:46 am »
我不怀疑技术上的能力,毕竟之前所说到的技术上的东西基本都实现了,但我也同意要谦虚一点

不过BM这次这么说是有目的的,实际上是有在为Cryptonomex做广告的意思

这几天英文版对新公司关于石墨烯code版权的问题讨论的热火朝天,实际上我最想知道的一点就是Cryptonomex公司的股权组成及组织架构,希望很快会有答案,不过对于我等小散来说,知道跟不知道其实也没多大区别

148
General Discussion / Re: Cryptonomex? WTF is this?
« on: June 15, 2015, 06:25:24 am »

I think it's pretty crazy how ready people can be to read the worst into every statement and look for conspiracies everywhere. If you actually think BM and the rest of the team are looking for ways to stab BTS in the back then I'm not sure what planet you're from.

I think this is more than a matter of 'trust BM and team'.  We are talking about a real legal corporate entity called 'Cryptomex'.  It has its own set of Directors and Sharesholders.  We do not know if BM is a major sharesholder (with voting rights) in Cryptomex and therefore has a major say in it.  Nor do we know if BM would continue to keep his major stake in Cryptomex (and not sell his shares) if he was indeed a major shareholder.  Any other external person who takes over as a major shareholder can vote out BM and team, and change the direction of Cryptomex.  There is nothing to stop Cryptomex to develop a competing chain, or chains, since it owns all the rights to bitshares.  We need clarity on the structure of Cryptomex.

 +5%
personally I will always trust BM, but Cryptonomex is a company, it will have complex conflicts of interest in future.

149
General Discussion / Re: Cryptonomex? WTF is this?
« on: June 14, 2015, 01:01:36 pm »
One can't help but wonder though. The devs are saying the licensing exists so that they can make money from it, because the income derived from BitShares has not been enough to sustain the dev team.

So, who else will be using graphene? And wouldn't most of these licensees then go on to develop direct competitors to BitShares?

Looks to me that for the devs it's a win-win situation, while for us, not so much.  [bitshares goes to the moon = win for devs, win for us | graphene sees mad adoption = win for devs, lose for bitshares/us]


What do you think Cryptonomex would do if tomorrow someone comes with $10mil to have them implement a direct competitor to BitShares ?
And could you really blame them for taking the offer?

"believe" is different from "have to believe", but now it seems we have no choice. that is the reality.

150
中文(Chinese) / 随便说说
« on: June 13, 2015, 04:12:49 pm »
首先声明,本文不涉及任何唱空或唱多

2.0的消息发布了有一周了,暂且抛开2.0这么多令人激动的新的feature的加入,主要想就新公司的成立谈谈自己的看法

为了解决开发资金问题,BM准备成立一个新的Cryptonomex专门负责研发新的toolkit的一个公司,该公司会声明对此toolkit的版权,公司收入应该是来源于BTS2.0系统内的worker角色以及以后可能的版权费用

我们先来回顾一下,实际上从PTS第一天挖矿开始,BM为首的开发团队就一直饱受资金的压力,首先我认同一点,那就是在目前的虚拟币届,开发是绝对的主导,特别是BTS这种走在区块链最前沿的开发团队来说更是如此,支持开发团队这一点我是坚决支持的,我相信很多PTSer/AGSer也是这么认为的,但随着去年7月份BTS的发布以及之后BTC的持续下跌,之前的资金几乎耗尽,于是在10月份迎来了第一次重大变更,短短几天时间社区少数服从多数,ags,pts,dns,vote被merger到全新的BTS中,我当时是很支持的,但我也知道很多AGSer/PTSer在这个时候失望离场,社区特别是中文社区开始分裂,然而随着BTS价格的下跌,这次的merger带来的资金实际上杯水车薪,于是有了区块链雇佣的产生,社区几乎没有多少反对声音,很快就实行了,但市场一再下跌,核心团队屈指可数的几个100%受托人带来的收益几乎可以忽略,实际上区块链雇佣目前已经名存实亡,所有人都可以看得出来,开发团队已经没钱了,所以这次的变更重组几乎是一定的

作为一个前无古人的公司(暂且这么叫)创业之初,要面对这么多的困难,我想很多人都是可以预计得到的,但从merger和区块链雇佣这两个目前来看比较失败的变更中我们应该可以分析一下,当初BM抛出这个想法的时候,我们都有这样一种感觉,目前的情况真的很糟糕,如果不这么做BTS将来就完了,实际上我当时也是这么认为的,这是一种典型的结果导向,但时间不能回转,我们也无法确定再来一次在那个时候能否有一种更好的解决方法,毕竟我们无法预知未来,如果BTS价格一路上升,可能之前的merger以及区块链雇佣在现在看来都是英明抉择呢,为什么会这样,同样的情形是否又一次出现了?但通过前面两次变更的时候当时的一些情形我感觉有两点需要反思一下

1. BM从提出想法到实施的过程非常短
2. 社区的反对声音几乎得不到重视

结合这次的新公司Cryptonomex的建立,我觉得我们可以好好思考一下,首先声明一点,我不是黑子,我并不是觉得新成立一个公司不好,实际上我跟第一次merger一样,我很赞同,但我觉得我们仍然有必要从上面两个方面好好思索一下,希望BM能吸取教训,尽量想的周全一点

从周一发布消息到现在,关于新的公司的具体运作并没有一个很明确的说法,也可能是我得到的信息不够,但我对于新的公司是否能够如BM所说的一劳永逸的解决开发资金的问题有疑问,是否有VC?如果没有VC,那作为worker,需要每个月从区块链中获取多少BTS才能保证开发的工资支出?如果BTS价格一再下跌,到时候怎么办?另外作为一个公司如果收入全部来源于区块链,如何通过审计?
对于观点不同的人我们应该以怎样的态度去沟通?黑子很多,但并不全然,如何争取那些曾经相信过我们的人以及一些冷眼旁观的人?利益分配上是否可以不用那么生硬的方式?

另外我说下为什么我赞同建立一个专门开发的公司

其实从逻辑上来讲很简单,Cryptonomex已经跟BTS绑定在一起了,如果成功了,那说明toolkit肯定是得到广泛认同,BTS也必然已经成功了,如果失败了,那照目前的区块链雇佣方式开发资金会更糟,那更加会失败,可能有人会说Cryptonomex以后可以不用管BTS了,实际上BM任何时候都可以抛掉BTS说byebye,只有成功了才是利益最大化

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15