Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Brekyrself

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 35
106
Any update in regards to the new software on testnet?  Is there any criteria in place to verify before scheduling a fork on the production network?

A very good questions. Yesterday I have asked the witnesses about the progress with their testing, but have yet to receive an answer.
Of course anyone is welcome to test on testnet, but the responsibility really lies with the witnesses, IMO.

Perhaps this is something the BitShares foundation can accomplish.  How do we hold witnesses to a higher standard?  Have a web page dedicated to witness feedback on items requiring testing?

107
The hardfork on testnet went well today. We successfully revived some bitassets after artificially created black swans.

The bad news is that, so far, witness participation leaves much to be desired:
* Of the 25 active witnesses on mainnet, only 12 are currently active on testnet.
* During and after the hardfork only rnglab, bhuz and lafona showed up on telegram. Later, wackou and thom (aka verbaltech) showed up. (Xeroc and myself were also present, but we're not witnesses.)
* I'm not aware of any witnesses preparing and/or executing significant tests.

Witnesses, please perform any acceptance tests you deem necessary on testnet. Report any bugs you find on github, or here in this thread if you don't have a github account. If no showstoppers turn up, I plan to prepare the main release in about a week, with the hardfork date at least one month in the future (this is open to discussion of course).

Any update in regards to the new software on testnet?  Is there any criteria in place to verify before scheduling a fork on the production network?

108
General Discussion / Starting to get noticed
« on: September 26, 2017, 03:53:29 am »
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-25/are-crypto-exchanges-about-become-decentralized

BitShares and OpenLedger mentioned on ZeroHedge today.  Reaffirms BTS was ahead of its time.

110
Technical Support / Re: pybitshares, historic trades() data & 100 limit?
« on: September 24, 2017, 04:53:23 pm »
@xeroc should be able to assist with this question.

111
very happy to hear the revive asset process had worked in the testnet. will be nice to paste some output so the users can get familiar with the process commands needed.

in regards to the addition of testnet to the explorer proposed by @Brekyrself , it is definitely possible but will need a new server to run the testnet and the explorer backend. i think it is good to have the explorer working in the production and testnet side by side. i am not sure however if this will help knowing what witnesses are diligent, please explain me more about that.

thanks.

As far as data metrics, I was thinking just mirroring the production explorer.  Witnesses should be testing the latest and greatest to make sure no block production issues arise before hitting production.

The basics such as seeing if the production witnesses are even running a node on testnet?
How many blocks they have missed? 
Perhaps even blocks missed/last 24 hours?
Statistics around publishing feeds and how often?


112
The hardfork on testnet went well today. We successfully revived some bitassets after artificially created black swans.

The bad news is that, so far, witness participation leaves much to be desired:
* Of the 25 active witnesses on mainnet, only 12 are currently active on testnet.
* During and after the hardfork only rnglab, bhuz and lafona showed up on telegram. Later, wackou and thom (aka verbaltech) showed up. (Xeroc and myself were also present, but we're not witnesses.)
* I'm not aware of any witnesses preparing and/or executing significant tests.

Witnesses, please perform any acceptance tests you deem necessary on testnet. Report any bugs you find on github, or here in this thread if you don't have a github account. If no showstoppers turn up, I plan to prepare the main release in about a week, with the hardfork date at least one month in the future (this is open to discussion of course).

Thank you for the follow up.  All witnesses should also be active on testnet to aid in development. 

@oxarbitrage any chance of adding the testnet to the explorer so we can see both networks?  This way we can see which witnesses are staying diligent to the bitshares ecosystem.
@bitcrab Can you push the witnesses you support to also run nodes on the testnet?

113
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: September 15, 2017, 12:02:32 am »
BTC tx backlog spiked, wonder how much of the price decline is people simply removing coins from exchanges?  Very mixed messages about what's actually going to happen in China.  Some say its a temporary halt on ICO's, others say the exchanges will stop trading?  Does that mean coins will be stuck on exchanges?

114
General Discussion / Re: STEALTH Status Update
« on: September 09, 2017, 09:30:21 pm »
BitShares Munich has been working on it.  Keep an eye here for updates: https://steemit.com/@kenCode

115
Thanks for the consistent updates.  Any opinion on this feature being discussed for a future core project? https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/356

116
Technical Support / Re: Waves Deposit I Sent, Isn't Showing Up?!?!
« on: August 27, 2017, 04:34:21 pm »
This is bitshares talk, just a bunch of users helping each other.

Are you using OpenLedger to transfer waves?

117
General Discussion / Re: Request for shareholder opinion
« on: August 24, 2017, 01:42:00 am »
features that require a hard fork or general rule changes - yes.

bugfixes - no

Some bugfixes may require a hardfork however this is a good guideline.  The more visibility into any hardfork upgrades is good for the whole community and those who are building businesses around the chain.

118
General Discussion / Re: Why development is not very active now?
« on: July 21, 2017, 02:17:05 am »
Bitshares is very active, only the major items will be pulled in the main github.  You will start to see Alfredo doing work here soon.

See:
Alfredo https://github.com/oxarbitrage
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@steempower/bitshares-state-of-the-network-19th-july-2017
https://github.com/kenCode-de?tab=repositories

119
Appears if you are a lifetime member, it's 121 bts for a 5 character or longer asset.

http://cryptofresh.com/fees

These can be changed if you have a real business case, you can justify to the committee members why they should be lowered.

120
Openledger / Re: Deposit Fee????????
« on: July 14, 2017, 07:34:17 pm »
This is a good reason to add the prefix back to all the assets.  To avoid such confusion this should be clearly labeled open.DOGE vs BTS for example.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 35