Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - puppies

Pages: 1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 [111]
1651
General Discussion / Re: Is SEC really not a concern?
« on: March 22, 2014, 05:06:06 am »
I could be wrong once again, but I'm pretty sure the purpose of the sec is the same as all regulatory agency's,  to protect established organizations from competition through raising the cost of entry.   Seems to me that they are doing exactly what they should to that effect.   

Perhaps you meant to say "the stated purpose of the sec"

1652
General Discussion / Re: Is SEC really not a concern?
« on: March 21, 2014, 02:48:55 am »
In this land of the free that I happen to live in, companies can be compelled to release any information on their clients.  Whats more they can be prosecuted for letting their clients know that they have been forced to release this information.

This naturally has no bearing on a company based in Romania, other than what can be brought to bear in the form of local armed thugs with the conviction that they have a right to inflict violence.  I'm not at all up to speed on the politics of Romania, but I'm pretty sure the USG hasn't started a drone campaign to eradicate the terrorist (anyone who disagrees with them) yet.

This may become an issue with any US based company like III though.  I would suggest giving them as little actual information as possible for your protection as well as theirs.  They can't be compelled to release information they don't have.

Perhaps a dead mans switch would work.  Perhaps a post every day from III to the effect of "we have not been approached by armed thugs attempting to steal our data today"  If a day goes by and you don't see that post then you might have something to worry about.

That is paranoia you're displaying. Invictus does not own Bitshares. The shareholders own Bitshares.

That means the government will just approach each one of us directly if there is a problem.

And they'll find out who has Bitshares when you pay your capital gains taxes. So the best defense in my opinion is transparency.

Give the government everything you are legally required to give. Comply with the law only as far as you are legally required to. Don't interact with the government any more than you are legally required to and don't volunteer to help with investigations, it's not your job and you won't be rewarded for helping to put someone from the community in jail.

I think Invictus is as safe as any company on Kickstarter but I'm not a lawyer. I don't even know the tax implications of this yet.

Paranoia?  My accurate depiction of doing business in the US?  My joking reference to drones in Romania?

My understanding of capital gains in that you are only required to report it when you cash out.  I don't know about you but I have no intention of trading my BTS for USD. 

Of course everyone should obey the armed thugs to the extent required to prevent them from being a victim of their state sanctioned violence.  You should almost always do what the man with the gun to your head says.

Transparency?  really buddy?  I suggest everyone keep only the absolutely required records (perhaps legally required would be a better way of stating it)

Even what you have to keep, or your communication.  Encrypt everything.  I take great solace in the fact that if the bastards want to look at the baby pictures I send my family they are going to have to waste the time and money decrypting it.

Now of course I don't suggest anybody disobey the armed thugs, that would just be stupid.  They have trained murderers on their payroll that honestly believe they have the right to kill you if you don't respect their authoritie, and I'm the sap that feels absolutely terrible if a possum or a bunny rabbit runs out in front of my car.

1653
General Discussion / Re: Is SEC really not a concern?
« on: March 21, 2014, 02:00:00 am »
In this land of the free that I happen to live in, companies can be compelled to release any information on their clients.  Whats more they can be prosecuted for letting their clients know that they have been forced to release this information.

This naturally has no bearing on a company based in Romania, other than what can be brought to bear in the form of local armed thugs with the conviction that they have a right to inflict violence.  I'm not at all up to speed on the politics of Romania, but I'm pretty sure the USG hasn't started a drone campaign to eradicate the terrorist (anyone who disagrees with them) yet.

This may become an issue with any US based company like III though.  I would suggest giving them as little actual information as possible for your protection as well as theirs.  They can't be compelled to release information they don't have.

Perhaps a dead mans switch would work.  Perhaps a post every day from III to the effect of "we have not been approached by armed thugs attempting to steal our data today"  If a day goes by and you don't see that post then you might have something to worry about.

1654
I would point you to mises.org

http://mises.org/books/economics_in_one_lesson_hazlitt.pdf
would be a good place to start.

1655
BitShares PTS / Re: [HELP NEEDED] accidentally deleted pts wallet!
« on: March 04, 2014, 07:50:05 am »
You should be good dude.   Your wallet is in your \users\<your user name>\appdata\roaming\protoshares folder.   Should be a file named wallet.dat.  copy that to your \users\<your user name>\appdata\roaming\bitshares-PTS folder.  (Only do this if there is no pts in your 1.0 wallet).  The appdata folder is a hidden folder so you will have to enable "show hidden files and folders" ability to get there.  Under Windows 7 you will find this option under organize> folder and search options.   Under Windows eight it's a check box in the view section.   I can't remember how to do it in Vista or xp,  but Google is your best friend.

Edited to fix the shitty auto correct thanks to Samsung.

1656
BitShares PTS / Re: Had some PTS in ypool account on Feb 28
« on: March 02, 2014, 03:52:47 am »
Probably not.  I noticed that 1gh seemed to freeze payouts as the snapshot time approached.  They didn't pay out until several hours after the snapshot was complete, and I had accumulated a balance of .37

1657
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iM_Ls46_tB8

Every time I reflect on it, I am amazed at how spot on Bastiat is even after all this time.

"all monopolies are detestable, but the monopoly on education is the most detestable of all"

1658
Keyhotee / Re: Introducing Keyhotee Video
« on: February 26, 2014, 08:41:38 am »
Thanks for the quick response bytemaster. 
It seems as if holding a copy of the Blockchain locally would be the safest bet.
I don't quite understand what you mean by proof of work, and proof of stake, but I'm guessing it has to do with my question about whether attacks would be possible with enough hashing power.  I'll dig in to it further.  I still have lots to learn. 

1659
Keyhotee / Re: Introducing Keyhotee Video
« on: February 26, 2014, 07:38:55 am »
It seems to me the greatest weakness is the domain name dac.   If someone can send back a false ip with that rogue sites public key the rest falls apart.

Am I missing something about the blockchain?  Is that information built into the blockchain?  If so would there be attacks possible if you had enough hashing power?   Are you connecting to multiple sources to verify that data?   Wouldn't that be rather slow?

Basically I'm asking how I would know that the ip and public key I receive are accurate?   Layman's terms would be appreciated.

Pages: 1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 [111]