211
Technical Support / Re: Can't vote?
« on: January 15, 2018, 08:57:28 pm »
You have to unset your voting proxy before you can cast your own votes.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
212
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: DEXBot - WP for User Friendly Market Making Software for Better Markets
« on: January 15, 2018, 03:03:15 pm »
1. IMO a good trading bot will be able to pay for itself. Which is also the reason why I wouldn't publish it if I created one. :-)
2. Offering a trading bot to the public is a bad idea, IMO. Such a bot makes it too easy for users to shoot themselves in the foot. They will blame it on us, even if was their own fault. See here for example: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23457.msg300913.html#msg300913
2. Offering a trading bot to the public is a bad idea, IMO. Such a bot makes it too easy for users to shoot themselves in the foot. They will blame it on us, even if was their own fault. See here for example: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23457.msg300913.html#msg300913
213
General Discussion / Re: How were the BTWTY tokens issued?
« on: January 15, 2018, 02:54:20 pm »
There's a command in the cli_wallet: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/blob/master/libraries/wallet/include/graphene/wallet/wallet.hpp#L1193
I don't think there is support in the GUI at this time.
I don't think there is support in the GUI at this time.
214
General Discussion / Re: How were the BTWTY tokens issued?
« on: January 14, 2018, 09:46:05 pm »
Right now there is no short position that could have been margin called, because the asset is still in black swan state.
It will be revived when either the BTS price increases so that the value of the settlement fund is higher than the collateral requirement for the existing BTWTY, or when an investor shows up and creates a bid for the missing collateral.
With 1.016 BTWTY currently in existance, a price feed of 576133 BTS/BTWTY, MCR of 175% and a settlement fund of 352693, an investor would have to offer this amount to get it revived:
1.016 * 576133 * 1.75 - 352693 = 671672 BTS
That's a lot of money. (And he'd be in danger of being margin called quickly, unless he'd put in even more.)
@EstefanTT you really should remove the override_transfer permission, or explain what you need it for. Doesn't look good.
It will be revived when either the BTS price increases so that the value of the settlement fund is higher than the collateral requirement for the existing BTWTY, or when an investor shows up and creates a bid for the missing collateral.
With 1.016 BTWTY currently in existance, a price feed of 576133 BTS/BTWTY, MCR of 175% and a settlement fund of 352693, an investor would have to offer this amount to get it revived:
1.016 * 576133 * 1.75 - 352693 = 671672 BTS
That's a lot of money. (And he'd be in danger of being margin called quickly, unless he'd put in even more.)
@EstefanTT you really should remove the override_transfer permission, or explain what you need it for. Doesn't look good.
215
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Acquire Bitshares.com Domain - Cryptonomex
« on: January 14, 2018, 09:20:31 am »As of right now, Cryptonomex holds the bitshares.org domain. Cryptonomex is a profit company and can go bancrupt (I couldn't find any transparent reports on that side), then the domain(s) are on the market again. Also, it is lead by one individual with all the power. Of course I do not want to insinuate any ulterior motives, but this is something one needs to think about in a worst-case-prevention model. For that reason it would feel better to give it to a non-profit entity, may it be the BBF or a new trustee.This!
216
General Discussion / Re: [BlockchainProjectsBV] First contribution to bitshares-core - claim BTS fee pool
« on: January 12, 2018, 02:34:52 pm »
If we plan for a fixed release schedule we need the resources to deliver. Which means mostly it's up to our paid developers. You decide, @abit @oxarbitrage . :-)
217
General Discussion / Re: Scorum (SCR) Sports Media Platform built on the Graphene Framework
« on: January 12, 2018, 02:14:50 pm »
The Scorum team has developed atomic swap support for the Scorum blockchain, to read all about this capability check out the Scorum Github.
Wow, excellent! We should port this to BitShares. https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/49
218
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Acquire Bitshares.com Domain - Cryptonomex
« on: January 11, 2018, 03:02:17 pm »
I'd support the effort in principle, however with Cryptonomex no longer being "the company behind bitshares" ownership of the domain should be transferred to the BitShares Foundation.
219
Technical Support / Re: Mystery Coins in My Account (PAYCASH & FAIRCOIN) What are these?
« on: January 11, 2018, 02:59:58 pm »
Some coin creators are trying to promote their coins by giving some away for free, unasked. I consider that SPAM, mostly.
220
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: escrow - to burn or not to burn
« on: January 04, 2018, 07:54:14 pm »
IMO the excess BTS must be burned. The worker had a clearly defined scope and a clearly defined price. Both have been fulfilled, so using the extra BTS for other purposes would be a breach of contract, in a way.
This holds for all workers, not just yours specifically, of course.
This holds for all workers, not just yours specifically, of course.
221
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Alfredo Garcia - Bitshares core developer - 1.14.75
« on: January 04, 2018, 07:49:07 pm »
222
General Discussion / Re: Introducing EasyDex -- Simplifying services to bring Bitshares to the masses!
« on: January 04, 2018, 07:45:13 pm »Guys, he just announced that they are going to do something nice for the ecosystem (or at least try) and they don't even ask for money. Why so much skepticism? It's not like they are scamming money out of the platform - let them do their thing
223
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Committee Vote: Fee reduction - keep an eye on it
« on: January 03, 2018, 01:31:32 pm »
Thanks @all. Can someone post a short overview about the differences and the reasoning behind them?
224
General Discussion / Re: Value of open.X vs X or bit.X vs X
« on: January 01, 2018, 08:26:19 pm »
OPEN.ETH is an IOU for actual ETH, issued by OpenLedger (a company registered in Denmark). As long as the company does not go broke, you can exchange OPEN.ETH for ETH (and vice versa) for a small fee, i. e. close to 1:1.
225
Technical Support / Re: Which command in CLI wallet to see all the owners of the asset?
« on: January 01, 2018, 08:20:39 pm »
The cli_wallet does not have such a command.
