Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pc

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ... 102
241
Technical Support / Re: Manually creating UIA through cli_wallet
« on: December 21, 2017, 12:40:40 pm »
Scroll to the right, and you'll see that you have an unrecognized character at the end of your statement. This is causing the error.

242
Technical Support / Re: Creating a fiat gateway
« on: December 20, 2017, 03:54:22 pm »
I'm not familiar with the procedures for the UI. Perhaps open an issue in the https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui repo and talk to Bill Butler and/or svk.

243
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: proposal to create bitXCD
« on: December 19, 2017, 07:23:33 am »
Thanks @bitcrab . I'm not an economics expert, so I suppose this makes sense. :-)

244
You must specify an amount greater than 0.0 (an issue_asset operation that doesn't issue anything doesn't make sense).

245
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: proposal to create bitXCD
« on: December 18, 2017, 05:53:39 pm »
I'm sure the info is available somewhere, but I'm too lazy to go searching... :-/ Nevertheless, I'm seriously interested in answers to the following questions:

1. What is the economic sense in an asset that has a fixed exchange rate to USD? Why should anyone not simply use USD instead?
2. Where does the "magic" value 2.7 stem from? Is there an economic reason for that value?
3. Can we be extremely sure that this value is not going to be redefined in the future?
3.a If we can't, we should have a plan how to handle such changes. Preferrably come up with a plan before creating the asset.
3.b If we can be sure, see question 1.

246
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: proposal to create bitXCD
« on: December 18, 2017, 05:48:06 pm »
Quote
MAXIMUM SUPPLY 100,000,000,000

I know that it's set to the same value for other smartcoins but is there any technical or practical reason to limit it to 100 billion? Can it be changed later?

The technical reason is that the total supply given as a multiple of the smallest possible unit should fit into an IEEE double floating point value, which has 52 bits of precision. With 4 decimals, 100bn is the largest power of 10 that fits into 52 bits.

IEEE double is the only native numeric type in some programming languages, most importantly JavaScript.

247
Technical Support / Re: Can't login suspect account has been hacked.
« on: December 18, 2017, 05:42:36 pm »
Even if your account *was* hacked that wouldn't prevent you from logging in.

I suppose you are either trying to log in on a different computer, or with a different browser, or you have cleared your browser cache. In each of these cases you have to restore the your backup file. It did tell you to make a backup when you created your account, right?

248
General Discussion / Re: Two question about exchange Fee
« on: December 17, 2017, 08:52:44 pm »
On BTS exchange (wallet.bitshares.org) it says: Fee: 6.8e-7
Is that in BTC (0.00027254075 BTC = 5,42 USD)?

See this for the fee schedule in BTS: https://bitshares.openledger.info/explorer/fees

Fees are always denominated in BTS. For convenience, it is possible to pay the fee in other assets as well, in that case the other asset is exchanged for the required amount of BTS behind the scenes, usually at a price that is slightly worse than the market price.

If I make an order, and it does not fill. Do I still have to pay the fee even the order is cancelled?

If you cancel an unfilled order, the fees for creating the order will be returned to your account (but to cancel the order you also have to pay a  fee - I believe it's 10% of the order creation fee).

249
Meta / Re: Message to the Developers
« on: December 17, 2017, 09:56:47 am »
Are the devs inconsiderate psychopaths or something.

No, they aren't. Unlike some forum users, it seems.

The current development team has nothing to do with Cryptonomex and/or Invictus Innovations, who received the early funding. So your demands and accusations are misplaced.

There are threads in the "technical support" section of the forum where some users offer help for such cases. Note that these offers are on a voluntary basis, so I'd suggest you ask *politely*, and be *patient*.

250
Technical Support / Re: How is a UIA burned?
« on: December 17, 2017, 09:50:09 am »
See reserve_asset under http://docs.bitshares.org/development/namespaces/wallet.html

I don't know how OpenLedger handle their UIAs. I don't think they issue/burn them for each deposit/withdraw, that would be kind of pointless.

251
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proposal: Lower "Vesting balance create" fees
« on: December 16, 2017, 01:00:33 pm »
IIRC creating vesting balances is intentionally expensive because it creates objects that permanently take up space in the internal database.

But I think it's time to reduce fees anyway. LTM was supposed to be around ~100 USD or so, it's been lot higher for the last couple of months.

252
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Full node
« on: December 15, 2017, 05:35:17 pm »
41.185.20.18:1776 shows up on http://seeds.quisquis.de/bitshares.html

253
Good job!

Minor nit: the worker budget is not capped at 21k per hour, instead the cap is a fraction of the total budget. The factor is 17*3600/2^32 per hour. And that's not configurable by the committee.

254
This is currently not possible. (Using OPEN.LTC or an escrow works, but is not trustless.)

Atomic Cross-Chain Trading is the important buzzword here, but it doesn't look like this is going to be implemented soon.

255
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Do not vote for my witness: etienne-marais
« on: December 13, 2017, 09:30:03 pm »
You can update your witness block signing key using the update_witness command in cli_wallet.

You really should practice such things on testnet first. ;-)

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ... 102