Im happy for you.
We might have been sloppy in the past, but have you seen how fast & usable the webwallet is now? Add to that we are finally deflationary!
Good time to buy back in.
The team ignore that the biggest user experience is like things making migration easier, notifying exchanges when upgrade.
It is not at the UI, but how smooth people use it. When people want to use 2.0, everyone have to migrate, and the team strangely do not think it important.
The result is, no one is actually responsible for bitshares.
We both pointed it out to the dev team and they got the message. Now lets cut them some slack and give them an opportunity to respond to feedback which unlike most teams they actually do respond to feedback.
I think Bitshares 2.0 is actually on an excellent track. Remember Windows wasn't an instant success. No one remembers Windows 1.0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_1.0Or Windows 2.0
Or Windows 3.0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_3.0It wasn't until Windows 3.1 and specifically Windows 95 before the world really took notice and the personal computer went from being a toy for nerds to being something everyone had to have. Bitshares is only on 2.0, it might take another year or two before the big breakthrough which could be Bitshares 3.0 or Bitshares 2017 or whatever.
The point? It takes years to build a new industry, to build a new market. It took years for people to get on the Internet. The Internet didn't start catching on until 1998-2000ish.
Bitshares has a pretty strong foundation, something to build from. Bitshares 3.0 should be far superior than Bitshares 2.0. Bitshares 3.0 should have perfected the UX and UI, and have everything necessary to be a decentralized NASDAQ/Forex and more.