Well, on the helpdesk you mentioned upgrading PTS. I am in agreement with the general idea but have a fw points to add.
There is talk of expanding the money supply, this i think is wrong. IMHO the best strategy is a 1:1 mapping of the PTS chain on a similar Xsatoshi client and leave it to typical PoS implementations. With the right specs, we can keep a viable chain moving off PoS only. (tried and tested) Our product NRS has done this for a while now. The well picked timespans and % stake rates have ensure the blocks move at a wonderful pace.
On to the suggestions of expanding the supply, i think the best way to do this is a chain that starts with DPoS right from the start but is seperate from PTS. My reasoning is as follows:-
1)I mined and worked and bought all my PTS, and there are promises made to me for all the effort in PTS. I would rather not have these affected by a expansion of the money supply.
2) The AGS issue lost us a lot of the supporters who started out, let's not make the same situation happen.
So, lets have a new Token, BTST, that has the features we require, and is added to our suite, but maintains a somewhat lesser role than PTS and AGS.
PTS=1 AGS=1 , BTST=(0.05) maybe
those numbers allow for a larger supply that does not threaten the position of PTS and AGS