« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC  (Read 20289 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

November 16, 2015, 11:21:52 pm Reply #42

Offline Akado

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2752
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: akado
Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
Quote from: topcandle on November 16, 2015, 09:53:28 pm
Quote from: Akado on November 16, 2015, 09:34:29 pm
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3t0kff/core_switched_to_libsecp256k1_for_verification/
LOL. Delayed a few months.

What's there to laugh about.  Bitshares has delayed many features it promised....

Many features that haven't been implemented by anyone. What's there to laugh about is people adore when Bitcoin implements some features and despise other projects that have those exact same features. That's what there's to laugh about. The irony of bitcoin having a great libertarian spirit behind it yet, their community is closed like the same banks they hate.
Logged
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads
November 16, 2015, 09:53:28 pm Reply #41

Offline topcandle

Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
Quote from: Akado on November 16, 2015, 09:34:29 pm
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3t0kff/core_switched_to_libsecp256k1_for_verification/
LOL. Delayed a few months.

What's there to laugh about.  Bitshares has delayed many features it promised....
Logged
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads
November 16, 2015, 09:34:29 pm Reply #40

Offline Akado

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2752
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: akado
Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
Logged
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads
March 12, 2015, 07:06:04 pm Reply #39

Offline vikram

Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
Quote from: pc on March 11, 2015, 10:07:17 pm
PR submitted: https://github.com/BitShares/fc/pull/4

Speedup of --rebuild-index is insignificant on my system, around 5%. Possibly more on an SSD. The indexing is heavy on IO, so not much speedup to be expected here.

Speedup of wallet_rescan_blockchain is 4% for the mixed implementation and 25% for pure libsecp256k1.

Note that block/transaction signature validation is skipped until after the most recent checkpoint, otherwise IO may not necessarily dominate.
Logged
March 12, 2015, 04:12:47 am Reply #38

Offline ElMato

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
    • View Profile
Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
great work @pc!!
 +5% +5%
Logged
March 12, 2015, 01:50:52 am Reply #37

Offline cube

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1404
  • Bit by bit, we will get there!
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcube
Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
Quote from: BTSdac on March 12, 2015, 01:26:42 am
very good work  +5%

Please remember to vote for dev-pc.bitcube. Give him your encouragement and love. :)
Logged
ID: bitcube
bitcube is a dedicated witness and committe member. Please vote for bitcube.
March 12, 2015, 01:26:42 am Reply #36

Offline BTSdac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: K1
Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
very good work  +5%
Logged
github.com :pureland
BTS2.0 API :ws://139.196.37.179:8091
BTS2.0 API 数据源ws://139.196.37.179:8091
March 11, 2015, 10:35:19 pm Reply #35

Offline robrigo

Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
Quote from: cass on March 11, 2015, 10:33:36 pm
wow that was fast @pc :)  +5%

Yeah what a beast. Good work PC!
Logged
March 11, 2015, 10:33:36 pm Reply #34

Offline cass

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4311
  • /(┬.┬)\
    • View Profile
Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
wow that was fast @pc :)  +5%
Logged
█║▌║║█  - - -  The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear  - - -  █║▌║║█
March 11, 2015, 10:07:17 pm Reply #33

Offline pc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1530
    • View Profile
    • Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko?
  • BitShares: cyrano
Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
PR submitted: https://github.com/BitShares/fc/pull/4

Speedup of --rebuild-index is insignificant on my system, around 5%. Possibly more on an SSD. The indexing is heavy on IO, so not much speedup to be expected here.

Speedup of wallet_rescan_blockchain is 4% for the mixed implementation and 25% for pure libsecp256k1.
Logged
Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko? ISBN 978-3-8442-6568-2 http://bitcoin.quisquis.de
March 10, 2015, 02:56:55 am Reply #32

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2821
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
Quote from: heyD on March 10, 2015, 12:28:20 am
Quote from: bytemaster on March 10, 2015, 12:05:15 am
Quote from: jsidhu on March 09, 2015, 10:57:21 pm
Quote from: vlight on March 09, 2015, 09:44:47 pm
But the main part that slows sync is HDD not CPU. The software could also use more RAM that is left unused.

Sorry it already uses too much RAM lol

We are working to reduce RAM and CPU.

Very glad to see you come back to the most critical topic.
+5%
+5% +5% +5%
Logged
March 10, 2015, 12:28:20 am Reply #31

Offline muse-umum

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
  • BitShares everything
    • View Profile
Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
Quote from: bytemaster on March 10, 2015, 12:05:15 am
Quote from: jsidhu on March 09, 2015, 10:57:21 pm
Quote from: vlight on March 09, 2015, 09:44:47 pm
But the main part that slows sync is HDD not CPU. The software could also use more RAM that is left unused.

Sorry it already uses too much RAM lol

We are working to reduce RAM and CPU.

Very glad to see you come back to the most critical topic.
+5%
Logged
March 10, 2015, 12:05:15 am Reply #30

Offline bytemaster

Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
Quote from: jsidhu on March 09, 2015, 10:57:21 pm
Quote from: vlight on March 09, 2015, 09:44:47 pm
But the main part that slows sync is HDD not CPU. The software could also use more RAM that is left unused.

Sorry it already uses too much RAM lol

We are working to reduce RAM and CPU. 
Logged
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.
March 09, 2015, 11:08:08 pm Reply #29

Offline jsidhu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
    • View Profile
Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
Quote from: vlight on March 09, 2015, 11:02:33 pm
Quote from: jsidhu on March 09, 2015, 10:57:21 pm
Quote from: vlight on March 09, 2015, 09:44:47 pm
But the main part that slows sync is HDD not CPU. The software could also use more RAM that is left unused.

Sorry it already uses too much RAM lol

Well, for me when syncing less than 100 hours left, it takes only 1GB of RAM(2GB unused), but uses HDD heavily.

On my ubuntu installations I always run out of 2 GB ram.. even after sync and restarting.. maybe jus tmemory leak in latest release... and my delegate always runs out i had to create a 4 gb swap file and that gets half used but then i start to miss blocks because its slow.. so i just restart it once eveyr few weeks
Logged
Hired by blockchain | Developer
delegate: dev.sidhujag
March 09, 2015, 11:02:33 pm Reply #28

Offline vlight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: vlight
Re: [BOUNTY] $5000 BitUSD - LibSecp256k1 integration with FC
Quote from: jsidhu on March 09, 2015, 10:57:21 pm
Quote from: vlight on March 09, 2015, 09:44:47 pm
But the main part that slows sync is HDD not CPU. The software could also use more RAM that is left unused.

Sorry it already uses too much RAM lol

Well, for me when syncing less than 100 hours left, it takes only 1GB of RAM(2GB unused), but uses HDD heavily.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 24 queries.