I am having a late night party here and have watched some of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StMBdBfwn8c&feature=youtu.behttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBlAVeVFWFMI also listened to this mumble hangout
http://bitsharesnews.info/post/138735906198/bitshares-dev-hangout-zero-fees-raw-episode where the idea was discussed to change the name to something that is more likeable / digestable. While I like "proof of contribution" this kind of behavior seems to me like the guy that constantly tries to change his outward style in order to be liked by girls instead of believing in his vision and style.
Of course the worst thing one can do is break the rules and regret it immediately - which is how I perceive Bitshares's approach to broadcasting its self publicly. A failure of this mode of operation though should not lead to the assumption that "doing as people please" is the optimal mode of (PR) operation, although it is an advancement.
My point is that public perception of value and superiority does not come from doing what is expected but from breaking the rules with the confidence that one is right to do so. That is to love oneself, i.e. liking the fact that one, like anyone
, is different.
What I like about Bitshares, Daniel and the whole community is the austrian economics inspired, technically nerdy (while Ethereum, it seems, tends to attract people that are "fashionably nerdy") way to approach system design. What do you like?
I suggest we stick to what we are good at and to the vision for blockchain technology we share here.