Main > Stakeholder Proposals
Four new delegates just appeared in the TOP10
Gentso1:
--- Quote from: Vato_ on October 29, 2014, 07:59:41 pm ---
--- Quote from: xeroc on October 28, 2014, 12:55:26 pm ---
--- End quote ---
Since my very first Delegates Report back in August I have recommended to disapprove them as they have been already identified as a suspicious large stakeholder.
--- End quote ---
I support this and all most feel like we should open a thread calling for others to do the same. Especially if we coordinate with the Chinese community
Shentist:
delegates without feeds should be outvoted. they do only half the job.
Gentso1:
--- Quote from: ripplexiaoshan on October 28, 2014, 10:41:03 pm ---The 101 delegates are now merely decided by BM, and BM evaluate the delegates mostly based on whether they are upgraded to the latest version or not, instead of price feed, contribution, reputation, etc.. Those four delegates didn't even introduce themselves, should be voted out.
--- End quote ---
I think at the very least BM should make the community aware before making sweeping changes.
Who are these people? Have they even made their delegate presence known? If the delegates don't even introduce themselves and are suddenly voted in are they BM personal friends?
If things are not done transparently it starts to look like a straw system, which I think few users would be in favor of.
cube:
--- Quote from: svk on October 28, 2014, 03:52:08 pm ---
--- Quote from: bytemaster on October 28, 2014, 02:04:08 pm ---I take that back, I did vote for them because they had upgraded their clients while others had not.
--- End quote ---
Yea I figured that was why. A lot of those new delegates aren't publishing feeds though, will you do another voting pass for the upcoming hard fork to promote delegates that will publish feeds? I'll be ready for that one I promise! :)
--- End quote ---
I had upgrade the client but did not publish the version. I will publish version and get my feeds ready for the coming hard fork too. :)
cube:
--- Quote from: svk on October 28, 2014, 01:18:32 pm ---
--- Quote from: xeroc on October 28, 2014, 12:55:26 pm ---It seems that a large stakeholder (probably a set of several stakeholders) decided to put some delegates in the active list
That party seems to have access to roughly 15% of the BTSX stake.
I'd kindly ask for the new delegates to introduce themselves!
Further, I'd recommend to publish feeds for the assets also!
Personally, I hope this is not one of the major exchanges as (IMHO) they are not supposed to vote for anybody using costumers funds!
--- End quote ---
About your question of whether exchanges are voting, I believe the answer is yes. They definitely have approved several delegates, but I can't say whether they are actively voting, though I suspect yes. Here's an example of a transfer from BTER to my account that shows 11 delegates have been chosen:
http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=602596
--- End quote ---
I agree. Exchanges should not be voting. These fund belongs to their customers. We should make it known to them.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version