Sparkle Alpha Test Network Live: Mining to be Honored in Real Network

[arubi]

Heh, so a miner had 55581 orphaned for being one second too late while still having the lower hash?
Looks like the Sparkle network is very well meshed

[Frodo]

Doesn't seem to be bad.

Code: [Select]


38853
     000000a58eb2be7d3bce0a462c05db01e67d4bad              Unknown Delegate              0       137 2014-12-14T21:55:14         1     N/A                  NO
     000000561d336a2d59ae9b55bf9b05550a1c56c6              Unknown Delegate              0       137 2014-12-14T21:55:31         0     YES                 YES
          55581
     0000002b43eddc9a80b07fa2a9d1b444504d49e5              Unknown Delegate              0       137 2014-12-18T22:06:00         2     YES                 YES
     0000001711c961d69b741e9e2eabc118f3a3958e              Unknown Delegate              0       137 2014-12-18T22:06:01         1     N/A                  NO
          55597
     000000305ebba802c4f0baa169691b96483364a1              Unknown Delegate              0       137 2014-12-18T22:11:32         1     YES                 YES
     0000004e22b1ef19bc7d2b0c068cef72e691525e              Unknown Delegate              0       137 2014-12-18T22:11:32         1     N/A                  NO
Currently I'm on 57626.

[arubi]

Thanks guys.
If anyone was running a client and hasn't --resync-blockchain (like I did), we could have a look at the network's forks.

[sparkles]

Seed Node: 104.131.0.131:36666

[turtletastic2]

network_get_peer_info returns these for me:

66.172.27.88:1766
85.214.126.216:1766
104.131.0.131:36666
66.172.27.128:1766
192.99.246.148:1766
66.172.11.125:1766

I'm on block 55987 (2014-12-19T00:29:22)

Hope that helps!

[bytemaster]

If sparkles integrated the changes in Alpha 7 I bet the test network has forked all to hell.   

[arubi]

162.243.160.72:52620
104.131.0.131:1765
98.240.161.119:59647
104.236.44.210:41655
162.213.195.203:1765

I'm not an idiot.
Does anyone have any live nodes that I can connect to?

[infovortice2013]

162.243.160.72:52620
104.131.0.131:1765
98.240.161.119:59647
104.236.44.210:41655
162.213.195.203:1765

[arubi]

Can anyone link me up with a node?
I'm already 17 hours behind

[roselee]

will there be a win wallet soon?

[sparkles]

https://github.com/sparkle5/Sparkle/releases

Alpha 7 has been released with the latest merged from BitShares

[smith7800]

under current difficulty , it is very hard to find a block .

It seems the difficulty has adjusted properly on its own.    This was a good test.

Is the Sparkle experiment going to continue?  It's caught my eye, at least.

Yes it will continue.  Snapshot in 2 days and then public launch once BTS has a stable version.   Hard forking Sparkle will be much harder than what we saw with BitShares today.

I am about to release another update with the latest BitShares updates merged in so we can continue to test it.

I noticed protoshares price moving around the other day.  Did that have anything to do with Sparkles?

[sparkles]

under current difficulty , it is very hard to find a block .

It seems the difficulty has adjusted properly on its own.    This was a good test.

Is the Sparkle experiment going to continue?  It's caught my eye, at least.

Yes it will continue.  Snapshot in 2 days and then public launch once BTS has a stable version.   Hard forking Sparkle will be much harder than what we saw with BitShares today.

I am about to release another update with the latest BitShares updates merged in so we can continue to test it.

[smith7800]

under current difficulty , it is very hard to find a block .

It seems the difficulty has adjusted properly on its own.    This was a good test.

Is the Sparkle experiment going to continue?  It's caught my eye, at least.

[sparkles]

under current difficulty , it is very hard to find a block .

It seems the difficulty has adjusted properly on its own.    This was a good test.