Author Topic: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor  (Read 36808 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline agran

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Quote
2x Xeon 8 Core E5-2650 2.00 GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
Please fix:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 8.2 hpm
MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG


Offline nomullet

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Can't believe how expensive that LGA 1366 hardware has gotten- looks like I could sell my 2 year old computer (i7 950) for more than I paid for it...

Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8 Hs/min 32 threads
M9ycAeveS8hhQtok6xgLPMEpGsZxFkcgzT

Offline luckye

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8 Hs/min 32 threads

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline agran

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
They do not. Dual L5639 just have a ton of GHz (24 v-cores).
« Last Edit: December 21, 2013, 11:32:33 pm by Delinquency »

Offline nomullet

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
I don't believe these older xeons have the AES instruction set.


4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?
M9ycAeveS8hhQtok6xgLPMEpGsZxFkcgzT

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile

4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?

I have a custom script that prevents 'watch' from abusing resources.
the miner runs as an idle process on linux by default.

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline Djemi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile

4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile

4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400
« Last Edit: December 21, 2013, 04:23:19 am by Delinquency »

Offline agran

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
AMD 8 Core FX-8350 - Windows 8 x64 = 2.95 hpm / Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 3.3 hpm
2x Xeon 8 Core E5-2650 2.00 GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG

Offline chida

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 77
    • View Profile
BTC: 12A5tZgivCa7BVF4YbQdtSedFzanpCbupb
MMC: MBayoLj9WEWTsCk8n45G37tDSSJP2Dd9k5
PTS: PiVUjNkwk6VKrKWCMtA7NkqFhfkqR5pnCS

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU