[ANN] MMCPool.com - GPU,CPU(yam) - The Awesomest Pool!

[isaacgoldbourne]

Ypool had 120% network rate on PTS in the early days, and nothing went WRONG

Even if we have 51% on the pool no fork will be initiated if we have strong connection to the main node.

I think the source to the pool needs to be released. It won't do the coin any favors if this gets to 51% (by the looks of things it will by tomorrow)

I know it won't fork, but it undermines the security of the coin for any one entity to have 51% of the hashing power as they could perform a 51% attack.

I'm not saying they will, but because they have the capability it devalues the coin.

120%?

Having one pool is not good for any coin. We need 10 pools, competition is good for the miners and good for the coin. We need distributed hashing before we can become worth a serious amount of money.

Already at 33% of the network, christ.

[isaacgoldbourne]

I keep getting this, mining for an hour
 
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected

On another machine I start the miner

./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user <address> --threads 1

and it says "KIlled" after being. What can be wrong?

If its two different machines we can rule out it being them (well, its unlikely).

Whats your network setup?

The first is behind a firewall at my home only getting rejects.
The second is a cloud vps server (512MB,  1 virtual core)

You need 1gb ram to mine MMC and try disabling the firewall and setting up portforwarding.

[Chronos24]

I pointed my 8320 rig at your pool. I'm pushing 3.0 HPM, Seems to be working great!

[arcke]

I keep getting this, mining for an hour
 
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected

On another machine I start the miner

./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user <address> --threads 1

and it says "KIlled" after being. What can be wrong?

If its two different machines we can rule out it being them (well, its unlikely).

Whats your network setup?

The first is behind a firewall at my home only getting rejects.
The second is a cloud vps server (512MB,  1 virtual core)

You need 1gb ram to mine MMC and try disabling the firewall and setting up portforwarding.

Yes, i was guessing at a memory limit problem. Maybe I will try a 1 GB solution.

[isaacgoldbourne]

I keep getting this, mining for an hour
 
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected

On another machine I start the miner

./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user <address> --threads 1

and it says "KIlled" after being. What can be wrong?

If its two different machines we can rule out it being them (well, its unlikely).

Whats your network setup?

The first is behind a firewall at my home only getting rejects.
The second is a cloud vps server (512MB,  1 virtual core)

You need 1gb ram to mine MMC and try disabling the firewall and setting up portforwarding.

Yes, i was guessing at a memory limit problem. Maybe I will try a 1 GB solution.

Should work at 1GB. It has to generate a set of data to perform hashes on which is why it uses so much RAM

[arcke]

I keep getting this, mining for an hour
 
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Rejected

On another machine I start the miner

./minerd --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user <address> --threads 1

and it says "KIlled" after being. What can be wrong?

If its two different machines we can rule out it being them (well, its unlikely).

Whats your network setup?

The first is behind a firewall at my home only getting rejects.
The second is a cloud vps server (512MB,  1 virtual core)

You need 1gb ram to mine MMC and try disabling the firewall and setting up portforwarding.

Yes, i was guessing at a memory limit problem. Maybe I will try a 1 GB solution.

Should work at 1GB. It has to generate a set of data to perform hashes on which is why it uses so much RAM

Thinking in the other direction, does  >>1GB, say 3-4GB benefit the speed of mining MMC (disregarding the possible use of more threads)?

[vorksholk]

Will throw 500-800 HPM at this within the next hour.

[FreeTrade]

Thinking in the other direction, does  >>1GB, say 3-4GB benefit the speed of mining MMC (disregarding the possible use of more threads)?

I think it's possible that running multiple hashes at the same time should show some modest performance gains. The gains should be better if you have multiple memory chips - so 1 hash per memorychip would probably be a good guide for maximum performance. No software to do this yet though.

[dima1236]

Looks like we are at 50% or getting close to it ( pool stats for the 50 addresses it shows : 3091.61 HPM ) , soon more

[vorksholk]

Looks like we are at 50% or getting close to it ( pool stats for the 50 addresses it shows : 3091.61 HPM ) , soon more

So far your pool has proved amazingly stable.

[dima1236]

It isn't mine lol, but i totally agree with you!

Looks like we are at 50% or getting close to it ( pool stats for the 50 addresses it shows : 3091.61 HPM ) , soon more

So far your pool has proved amazingly stable.

[s4l1h]

MCzcJ537n5k62rrVpKdDLffVfxYXroACpM   651.94
MTcEYSKqamSVTDEZTqyYBr64Fbv5Y7srv8   616.89
MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN   437.26
M8d1Lz1dhxiaKJxVB1s6pZ3VghDsCntEw6   369.26
MGKWVo3Uj8NLGLAoUwcvdmzDH5Q25g7CuS   352.61
MLVRxsxpvd6m87s7WBaeZ63ktF44BziadB   346.18
MMTkW4RDPqY63D6B9rLXWBQe8KdXKAZf8P   341.88


Lol all botnets for 600 hpm  need min 200 x E3 server.

[nomullet]

Pool seems to be running but your linux install instructions don't make any sense and don't seem to work (at least on debian wheezy)

[vorksholk]

MCzcJ537n5k62rrVpKdDLffVfxYXroACpM   651.94
MTcEYSKqamSVTDEZTqyYBr64Fbv5Y7srv8   616.89
MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN   437.26
M8d1Lz1dhxiaKJxVB1s6pZ3VghDsCntEw6   369.26
MGKWVo3Uj8NLGLAoUwcvdmzDH5Q25g7CuS   352.61
MLVRxsxpvd6m87s7WBaeZ63ktF44BziadB   346.18
MMTkW4RDPqY63D6B9rLXWBQe8KdXKAZf8P   341.88


Lol all botnets for 600 hpm  need min 200 x E3 server.

Or, you know, around $28/hour worth of EC2.

[s4l1h]

MCzcJ537n5k62rrVpKdDLffVfxYXroACpM   651.94
MTcEYSKqamSVTDEZTqyYBr64Fbv5Y7srv8   616.89
MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN   437.26
M8d1Lz1dhxiaKJxVB1s6pZ3VghDsCntEw6   369.26
MGKWVo3Uj8NLGLAoUwcvdmzDH5Q25g7CuS   352.61
MLVRxsxpvd6m87s7WBaeZ63ktF44BziadB   346.18
MMTkW4RDPqY63D6B9rLXWBQe8KdXKAZf8P   341.88


Lol all botnets for 600 hpm  need min 200 x E3 server.

Or, you know, around $28/hour worth of EC2.

You have calculator?

see amazon hashpermin :https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1498.0