Author Topic: Bitshares price discussion  (Read 462254 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline morpheus

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 81
    • View Profile
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2340 on: February 02, 2016, 06:23:39 am »
I would filter by filled orders as asshole1 is probably just creating and canceling. 



Looks like a steady linear uptrend for now.  Hopefully we can stabilize at higher rates.

Offline Akado

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2752
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: akado
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2341 on: February 08, 2016, 03:12:17 am »
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline Brekyrself

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
    • View Profile
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2342 on: February 08, 2016, 03:21:08 am »
http://cryptofresh.com/u/deer0913

9M incoming

Could be wanting to get in on the ETH bandwagon...  The speculation with ETH is simply amazing.  More liquidity on the bts market would help significantly once people can see they can easily get in and out of the derivatives.

Offline clayop

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2033
    • View Profile
    • Bitshares Korea
  • BitShares: clayop
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2343 on: February 08, 2016, 04:21:03 am »
morpheus is our new Ander

I'm glad there is at least one person in the world that still believes in Bitshares' potential.

Here is something that makes me believe in BitShares - the exchange is actually growing in usage: http://cryptofresh.com/charts

The overall trend is up, and each of those peaks are higher.

You mean the asshole's "bot" is working greater each passing day?... well together of the other 'no-matching' bots?

Are the bots paying fees resulting in BTS being burned or returned to the reserve pool?  If so then it doesnt really matter whether its a bot or a person making the orders.


Successful exchanges with liquidity will attract a lot of bots.  Poloniex has tons of them, any time you put in a big order, bots will instantly move orders in front of it.

Yes they're paying. Kkachi already paid around 500~1000 (after LTM) BTS and will pay more as market grows. Durumi is under testing but is expected to work with Open.ETH.
Bitshares Korea - http://www.bitshares.kr
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

Offline Ander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3506
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: Ander
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2344 on: February 12, 2016, 01:57:57 am »
ITS ALIVE!
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2345 on: February 12, 2016, 02:03:21 am »
ITS ALIVE!
wow what happened? What are the news?
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline Ander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3506
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: Ander
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2346 on: February 12, 2016, 02:04:21 am »
ITS ALIVE!
wow what happened? What are the news?

Nothing.  Its just that traders got an absolute shitton of money from ETH and EXP and now they are goign to buy up everything.

Do not sell your BTS.
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline vlight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: vlight
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2347 on: February 12, 2016, 02:07:01 am »
ITS ALIVE!
wow what happened? What are the news?
Some plebs did better marketing at poloniex trollbox for free and were more effective than some overpaid scrubs here :P

Offline Akado

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2752
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: akado
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2348 on: February 12, 2016, 02:07:15 am »
ITS ALIVE!
wow what happened? What are the news?

Nothing.  Its just that traders got an absolute shitton of money from ETH and EXP and now they are goign to buy up everything.

Do not sell your BTS.

If some got a a lot of money, someone had to loose it  :P
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline Ander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3506
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: Ander
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2349 on: February 12, 2016, 02:10:27 am »
WOW!

Its like...5% of the percentage rally that ETH got!
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline Ander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3506
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: Ander
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2350 on: February 12, 2016, 02:12:03 am »
Just dont start marginng all in long with your BTS stack as your collateral. :P
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline Riverhead

Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2351 on: February 12, 2016, 02:18:02 am »
Just dont start marginng all in long with your BTS stack as your collateral. :P

I will be settling my shorts in the DEX before I lower my ratio. The spike is great but there's danger in these here waters....

TravelsAsia

  • Guest
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2352 on: February 12, 2016, 02:20:00 am »
ITS ALIVE!
wow what happened? What are the news?
Some plebs did better marketing at poloniex trollbox for free and were more effective than some overpaid scrubs here :P

I saw Xeroc in there the other day laying down the truth.

Offline Empirical1.2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1366
    • View Profile
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2353 on: February 12, 2016, 02:22:51 am »
localhost just sent 5 million to Poloniex, has 32 million BTS in account who's that?
If you want to take the island burn the boats

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
Re: Bitshares price discussion
« Reply #2354 on: February 12, 2016, 02:24:10 am »
localhost just sent 5 million to Poloniex, has 32 million BTS in account who's that?

in my view BM (or close relative)
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.