Author Topic: Accelerated Vesting of old BTS?  (Read 1658 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bitmeat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
    • View Profile
Accelerated Vesting of old BTS?
« on: June 16, 2015, 04:49:20 pm »
What about BTS vesting? Can we accelerate the vesting in the new BTS 2.0?

i.e. shouldn't we just remove the vesting for the old assets altogether once live on the new chain? This would also encourage abandoning the old chain.

When companies get bought / merged, they usually do accelerated vesting of all the outstanding options.

Offline bytemaster

Re: Accelerated Vesting of old BTS?
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2015, 04:50:13 pm »
That would change the expected "dilution rate"
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline vikram

Re: Accelerated Vesting of old BTS?
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2015, 08:18:01 pm »
This would simplify the migration but I don't think anyone can decide to change this rule unless we have a real stake-weighted poll on it like the kind Agent86 is talking about here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17204.msg219823.html#msg219823

Offline Shentist

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1601
    • View Profile
    • metaexchange
  • BitShares: shentist
Re: Accelerated Vesting of old BTS?
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2015, 07:28:12 pm »
This would simplify the migration but I don't think anyone can decide to change this rule unless we have a real stake-weighted poll on it like the kind Agent86 is talking about here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17204.msg219823.html#msg219823

sry, there will be so much change, this should be discussed and considered.

It will help to make everything simpler in the future, because you need nothing to explain or code for the merger.

i would prefer to get rid of the vesting. why should we keep this 2 class in 2.0 anyway? The vesting was long enough for my liking.