Lets here who the bank is already

[BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode]

Deals like that are often started in an NDA and nothing is said till the ink is dry and thing are 'official'.

[sittingduck]

It probably isn't Bm decision. He is probably under nda


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Krills]

just another hotair from dev.dont take it seriously.

[cass]

Don't think we have a chance against their marketing currently. Let them do their launch and then let us get back to our own stuff.

agreed!

I also agree.
Bitshares need to stay on its own, banks can go and work it out themselves.
long live bitshares!

Welcome on board ... maybe you missed it ..ethereum markting was meant here!

[regismol]

Don't think we have a chance against their marketing currently. Let them do their launch and then let us get back to our own stuff.

agreed!

I also agree.
Bitshares need to stay on its own, banks can go and work it out themselves.
long live bitshares!

[cass]

Don't think we have a chance against their marketing currently. Let them do their launch and then let us get back to our own stuff.

agreed!

[xeroc]

A couple of mumbles ago, BM mentioned that a "major bank" is interested in working with us. The price right now is so pathetically low that they should already have done all the front-running they need. Why would there be a problem in disclosing who the bank is? It should be the next Summer announcement.

They may be preparing something already!

We need something to steal Ethereum's thunder, which apparently is launching today.

Don't think we have a chance against their marketing currently. Let them do their launch and then let us get back to our own stuff.

Is that bank just interested in licensing Graphene for a private blockchain, like so many banks seem to want to do these days?

Maybe that's what they want to find out in the cooperations?!

[speedy]

A couple of mumbles ago, BM mentioned that a "major bank" is interested in working with us. The price right now is so pathetically low that they should already have done all the front-running they need. Why would there be a problem in disclosing who the bank is? It should be the next Summer announcement.

We need something to steal Ethereum's thunder, which apparently is launching today.

Is that bank just interested in licensing Graphene for a private blockchain, like so many banks seem to want to do these days?