Author Topic: [ANN] MMC.1GH.COM - GPU mining, CPU mining ★  (Read 104622 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Trokhon

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
where can I find new version? 1 post isnt that the old one?

Offline teenagecheese

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
    • View Profile
Reporting maybe .4 hpm increase with new miner on R9 290. Thanks for putting these out.

Edit: ...and getting coil whine now too. Is that bad for the GPU, should I switch back to the old miner?
« Last Edit: January 08, 2014, 03:47:31 am by wmvatis »

Offline phrozenspite

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 58
    • View Profile
trying it now.  i might be seeing about a .5 hpm increase on my 7970, but i think desktop interactivity while mining has increased lol
supporting Newmine for a fair Memorycoin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389386.0

Offline reorder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
    • View Profile
Guys,

We have finally updated the miner. It has a slightly better HPM than previous version and tries to run on Nvidia.

Please report your success (or lack of) running it.

Offline Drew

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Awesome!  Can't wait to try new miner.  I have an Nvidia 680 I can see if it is worth mining on.  Will the new miner work on a 6990 with 2gb of memory?  All I get are rejects, but it thinks it is supported currently.  Thanks for all your efforts on this!

Offline reorder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
    • View Profile
What might be the cause of increasing rates of rejects, it usually gets worse later, like this:


mmc-miner.exe MDxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8
Skipping device 1 (Pitcairn
  ): GLOBAL_MEM_SIZE 1073741824 < required 2147483648
Skipping device 2 (       Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
  ): not a GPU
Mon Jan 06 08:32:56 2014 Miner Starts - mmcpool.1gh.com:8080
MC2Hasher:0 initialized on device: Tahiti
                   type: 4, vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.   , mem: 322122
5472 with 1-pass algo
Mon Jan 06 08:33:02 2014 Worker 0 hpm 16.124698 wpm 16.124698 A/R/T 1/0/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:18 2014 Worker 0 hpm 15.115635 wpm 18.138762 A/R/T 2/0/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:24 2014 Worker 0 hpm 18.336007 wpm 18.336007 A/R/T 3/0/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:27 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.412329 wpm 18.371096 A/R/T 3/1/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:31 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.233606 wpm 18.394187 A/R/T 4/1/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:40 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.685382 wpm 18.431873 A/R/T 5/1/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:53 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.913477 wpm 18.478596 A/R/T 5/2/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:56 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.622452 wpm 18.487136 A/R/T 5/3/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:57 2014 Worker 0 hpm 24.563319 wpm 18.422489 A/R/T 5/4/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:03 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.103937 wpm 18.483150 A/R/T 5/5/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:09 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.533367 wpm 18.490503 A/R/T 5/6/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:16 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.125546 wpm 18.500437 A/R/T 5/7/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:16 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.830878 wpm 18.449712 A/R/T 6/7/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:34:19 2014 Worker 0 hpm 25.155682 wpm 18.496825 A/R/T 6/8/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:35 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.146350 wpm 18.455292 A/R/T 6/9/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:48 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.418779 wpm 18.517174 A/R/T 6/10/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:51 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.280423 wpm 18.518519 A/R/T 6/11/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:14 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.930554 wpm 18.520832 A/R/T 7/11/0 -> RP
C result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:35:14 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.336024 wpm 18.492698 A/R/T 7/12/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:24 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.022056 wpm 18.499866 A/R/T 7/13/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:30 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.868558 wpm 18.531418 A/R/T 8/13/0 -> RP
C result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:35:36 2014 Miner Stops - mmcpool.1gh.com:8080
Terminate batch job (Y/N)?
Either they are stales, or the card gives hardware errors. New version of miner will print reject reason for rejected shares.

Offline Armchair Miner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
What might be the cause of increasing rates of rejects, it usually gets worse later, like this:


mmc-miner.exe MDxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8
Skipping device 1 (Pitcairn
  ): GLOBAL_MEM_SIZE 1073741824 < required 2147483648
Skipping device 2 (       Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
  ): not a GPU
Mon Jan 06 08:32:56 2014 Miner Starts - mmcpool.1gh.com:8080
MC2Hasher:0 initialized on device: Tahiti
                   type: 4, vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.   , mem: 322122
5472 with 1-pass algo
Mon Jan 06 08:33:02 2014 Worker 0 hpm 16.124698 wpm 16.124698 A/R/T 1/0/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:18 2014 Worker 0 hpm 15.115635 wpm 18.138762 A/R/T 2/0/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:24 2014 Worker 0 hpm 18.336007 wpm 18.336007 A/R/T 3/0/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:27 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.412329 wpm 18.371096 A/R/T 3/1/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:31 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.233606 wpm 18.394187 A/R/T 4/1/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:40 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.685382 wpm 18.431873 A/R/T 5/1/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:53 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.913477 wpm 18.478596 A/R/T 5/2/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:56 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.622452 wpm 18.487136 A/R/T 5/3/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:57 2014 Worker 0 hpm 24.563319 wpm 18.422489 A/R/T 5/4/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:03 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.103937 wpm 18.483150 A/R/T 5/5/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:09 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.533367 wpm 18.490503 A/R/T 5/6/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:16 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.125546 wpm 18.500437 A/R/T 5/7/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:16 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.830878 wpm 18.449712 A/R/T 6/7/0 -> RPC
 result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:34:19 2014 Worker 0 hpm 25.155682 wpm 18.496825 A/R/T 6/8/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:35 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.146350 wpm 18.455292 A/R/T 6/9/0 -> RPC
 result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:48 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.418779 wpm 18.517174 A/R/T 6/10/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:51 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.280423 wpm 18.518519 A/R/T 6/11/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:14 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.930554 wpm 18.520832 A/R/T 7/11/0 -> RP
C result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:35:14 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.336024 wpm 18.492698 A/R/T 7/12/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:24 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.022056 wpm 18.499866 A/R/T 7/13/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:30 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.868558 wpm 18.531418 A/R/T 8/13/0 -> RP
C result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:35:36 2014 Miner Stops - mmcpool.1gh.com:8080
Terminate batch job (Y/N)?

Offline billgeo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
I'm down to beta test a GPU miner for HD 6970 2GB.

Currently the miner produces only rejected shares with a 5xxx / 6xxx card.
If reorder will be kind enough to develop a fix for the current miner it will be great!
A lot of us will not only beta test it but actively use it!!!  :D

(meanwile I am waiting for my 7970s to arrive...)

10 kinds of people...

Offline phrozenspite

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 58
    • View Profile
awesome keep up the good work
supporting Newmine for a fair Memorycoin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389386.0

Offline TiGei99

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
A slightly optimized (~5%) and supporting Nvidia (maybe, tested only on AWS) miner version is on its way. ETA is several hours to a day. I will post an update when it is ready for download.
Nice news  8)
MMC: MDp6AbARFnh68S8jURM4T8WBWudY5caMPq

Offline reorder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
    • View Profile
A slightly optimized (~5%) and supporting Nvidia (maybe, tested only on AWS) miner version is on its way. ETA is several hours to a day. I will post an update when it is ready for download.

Offline chida

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 77
    • View Profile
Guys,

I have now a build of GPU miner that works with Nvidia. Its performance is rather disappointing, though: AWS g2.2xlarge (GRID K520) yields just 3.58hpm. It cannot be significantly improved upon. Consumer-grade cards would yield a similar or worse performace. Given that, please give your opinion on whether you would be using such a miner.

I'd love to do a tester
BTC: 12A5tZgivCa7BVF4YbQdtSedFzanpCbupb
MMC: MBayoLj9WEWTsCk8n45G37tDSSJP2Dd9k5
PTS: PiVUjNkwk6VKrKWCMtA7NkqFhfkqR5pnCS

Offline reorder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
    • View Profile
Guys,

I have now a build of GPU miner that works with Nvidia. Its performance is rather disappointing, though: AWS g2.2xlarge (GRID K520) yields just 3.58hpm. It cannot be significantly improved upon. Consumer-grade cards would yield a similar or worse performace. Given that, please give your opinion on whether you would be using such a miner.
Do you use CUDA or OpenCL?
OpenCL for the moment. It is calculation-bound though, CUDA would not make much difference.

Offline TiGei99

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
Guys,

I have now a build of GPU miner that works with Nvidia. Its performance is rather disappointing, though: AWS g2.2xlarge (GRID K520) yields just 3.58hpm. It cannot be significantly improved upon. Consumer-grade cards would yield a similar or worse performace. Given that, please give your opinion on whether you would be using such a miner.
Do you use CUDA or OpenCL?
MMC: MDp6AbARFnh68S8jURM4T8WBWudY5caMPq

Offline darkEyexp

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
someone please explain me why are a huge different in performance between 7950 and 7970??
with my 7950 got 10 hpm >>> scrypt mining 650
with my 7970 got 19 hpm >>> scrypt mining 600

why is so bad the performance of the 7950??
Thanks
the 7970 should be faster in scrypt as well.  7970 is just more powerful in about every way

7870 gets almost 10 and my 7950 gets the same.. do you think the 2 gpu are the same?
The 7870 that does 10hpm is gigaherz edition, 7950 runs cores at 800MHz. This compensates for the difference in number of shaders.

my 7950 is oced to 1050 / 1400.. i think there is a bug or anything with 7950..