Author [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: Important Criticism  (Read 4981 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline donkeypong

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2331
    • View Profile
Re: Important Criticism
« Reply #105 on: August 20, 2015, 04:27:16 AM »
I like that one. Much simpler. ID means identity to everyone. And you can still go with the IDB abbreviation.

Offline BunkerChain Labs

Re: Important Criticism
« Reply #106 on: August 20, 2015, 05:24:15 AM »
What about IDBit?

My favorite...sorted and we have the URL's IDBit.org and info

NICE!  +5%
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | World's First Decentralized Tournament Platform Built Entirely on the Blockchain!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline Method-X

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1131
  • VIRAL
    • View Profile
    • Learn to code
  • BTS: methodx
Re: Important Criticism
« Reply #107 on: August 25, 2015, 02:58:34 PM »
I feel so indecisive saying this but Identabit is kind of growing on me. It was the capital D that put me off. If it's between IDbit and Identabit, I much prefer identabit.

Offline James212

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 312
    • View Profile
Re: Important Criticism
« Reply #108 on: August 31, 2015, 03:19:29 PM »
PLease let CAss help with your marketing.  WOuld love a name brand change before you get too many T-SHirts printed, but it is what it is.  I might suggest something that conjures the feeling of openness, honesty, integrity, transparency, honesty other than identity which is only the means to the end (trust based on truth)

 +5%

  .....and I would add "something that conjures the feeling of "security".   "Identity" can easily be taken as a negative and it is something the user must give up.....a forfeiture of privacy if you will.     However security is generally seen as something positive that is being provided.     I would NOT suggest "securabit" though.  I think all aspects of the product name can be much improved with some marketing brain storming. 
BTS: theangelwaveproject

Offline James212

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 312
    • View Profile
Re: Important Criticism
« Reply #109 on: August 31, 2015, 03:20:48 PM »
I like this project and think it has potential. The one thing that seems unprofessional to me is the name itself. I would suggest using a naming service like http://www.namebase.com (there are many others). I would also recommend staying away from any and all cliches like "bit" for example. I would opt for a name that has nothing to do with cryptocurrency. Example: Ethereum, Ripple, Stellar, Graphene. These are all great names.

 +5%
BTS: theangelwaveproject

Offline James212

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 312
    • View Profile
Re: Important Criticism
« Reply #110 on: August 31, 2015, 03:25:36 PM »
What functionality does Ethereum have (or promise to have in the future) over BitShares? How much does the name "Ethereum" contribute to its current 10x market cap advantage over BitShares?

Etherium has a good market cap because they were able to get momentum behind their tech. That counts more than many here would like to believe.

 +5%
BTS: theangelwaveproject

 

Google+