Author Topic: Looking for well stated arguments for why the government cannot censor crypto  (Read 9480 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline phillyguy

I would like to see Mesh Networks begin to proliferate as a solution to ISP censorship. Here's a cool article about how FireChat was used during the protests in Hong Kong.

http://berkeleytechreview.com/firechat-and-activism/
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline topcandle

This is a sad statement.  I always saw cypto proliferation has having the chance to thrwat censorship in other nations. 

It's far ahead now-- but technology may prove to undercuts governments censorship tools (eg. SpaceX and satellite internet and Google Blimps and Pcell).  Is there any forecoming developments in the sophistication of the local access networks? What would allow the necessities of the current ISPs structures to be reduced...?
« Last Edit: August 31, 2015, 01:37:08 pm by topcandle »
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline bytemaster

This is an old article, but one that highlights some of the reasons why the government has a hard time shutting down crypto.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/us-government-calls-censor-twitter-threaten-free-speech


For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline bytemaster

Everyone in the crypto currency space presumes that Bitcoin and other P2P protocols create a censorship resistant finanical platform.

It is my opinion, that any PUBLIC P2P network can easily be censored by ISPs.  If you can join the network, then you can discover the IP and PORT of every publicly accessible node and then block all packets to/from those nodes on those ports.

Furthermore, every website that hosts content (binaries, source, and seed node IPs) can be shut down in a similar manner.

Even MaidSafe and Tor are not able to prevent this kind of censorship. 

Now clearly, it would be difficult to engage in this kind of censorship on a global scale.   The end result would be for people to move to VPN systems, which would in turn come under attack because they are "publicly known".   

At the end of the day, the great Firewall of China can be applied to any country at any time. 

If that were to happen then consensus would have to move to dark networks, on an invite-only basis and the utility of crypto-currencies in general would be dramatically undercut. 

In other words, crypto-currencies currently depend upon free speech. 

We live in a world where despite the government's best efforts illegal music, movies, and other content manages to survive.   What does this tell us?   How can centralized services provide us magnet links to torrents with public IPs and those hosts are not shut down?







For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.