Things that make you go Ummm...

[sudo]

You do know that you can list a bunch of "problems" for the most advanced aircraft carrier right ?

The competitive edge of Bitcoin is the liquidity , marketcap , network effect , not technology .

You can bash bitcoin's technology all you want , but in the end you would just push away a major community that's open minded enough to invest in something "so lame , so slow , so old" . If they're opened minded for something "so lame" , imagine what they would see in BitShares if you present it well ?

The best way to achieve the success for BitShares is to grow the whole crypto and blockchain industry instead of hoping people would abandon bitcoin and come to jesus .

Like it or not , Bitcoin will grow , the blockchain industry will grow , multiple projects will grow , even the ones lamer than Bitshares , even the ones who refuse to take BitShares's technology , even the ones with 1 hour confirmation . And investors are investing in the whole industry instead of a single project now .

You have to adjust your expectations . You don't need people to sell their bitcoin and buy Bitshares . You need people to buy Bitcoin and Bitshares because they're both awesome .

And there are many ways to show how awesome something is . Making people think they're not wise enough to choose your product is not a good way . At least not a good way for a project that's suppose to gain the most network effect as possible .

Come back to the question in OP . It's not a matter of "good" or "bad" or "problems" , it's about the suitableness in specific applications . You should link the features to a specific application to sell it , such as high volume stock trading .

Imagine a world where people use Bitcoin as currency in a major way , and businessmen use BItShares to issue and trade stocks , and Bitcoin would be still slow , lame as hell . So what ? Who says that's not a win for BitShares if other project still succeed with lame features while BitShares also succeeded ?

 

[cusknee]

为什么花了一年时间从0.34跌到0.034都不能让你这个傻逼意识到比特币有什么问题都不关你屁事对比比特币有个鸡巴卵用有个鸟人会对你解决了比特币什么问题感兴趣吗真是傻逼操

Stan就是个无药可救的傻屌，big thing，big到连他老母都被套了。
比特币有问题，你比特股何尝没有问题，非得需要靠埋汰别人踩着别人上吗？
就这点来说，我觉得cnx这群技术宅仍然太幼稚。
比特股还有很长的路要走啊。
Stadn和BM啊,你们两父子别因为最近涨了那么一丢丢就觉得好像全世界都没你们牛掰一样啊。

from google translate...

Why did it take a year fell to 0.034 from 0.34 this sucker does not make you realize what the problem is not bitcoin none of your business compare bitcoins have a dick egg with a bird who would you have solved what bitcoins it is really a sucker speak of issues of interest

Stan is a hopeless silly cock, big thing, big to even his mother are quilt.
Bitcoin there is a problem, why do not you share a bit problem, we have to rely on Mai Tai someone stepping on others?
On this point, I think cnx house these technologies are still too naive.
Bit stocks still have a long way to go ah.
Stan and BM ah, you two father and son do not because of the recent rise so a Diudiu did you feel like the world as cattle breaking ah.

An attempt by a weak mind to express itself forcefully.

[xeroc]

为什么花了一年时间从0.34跌到0.034都不能让你这个傻逼意识到比特币有什么问题都不关你屁事对比比特币有个鸡巴卵用有个鸟人会对你解决了比特币什么问题感兴趣吗真是傻逼操

Stan就是个无药可救的傻屌，big thing，big到连他老母都被套了。
比特币有问题，你比特股何尝没有问题，非得需要靠埋汰别人踩着别人上吗？
就这点来说，我觉得cnx这群技术宅仍然太幼稚。
比特股还有很长的路要走啊。
Stan和BM啊,你们两父子别因为最近涨了那么一丢丢就觉得好像全世界都没你们牛掰一样啊。

Is this is how people talk on the chinese subforums??

[betax]

You do know that you can list a bunch of "problems" for the most advanced aircraft carrier right ?

The competitive edge of Bitcoin is the liquidity , marketcap , network effect , not technology .

You can bash bitcoin's technology all you want , but in the end you would just push away a major community that's open minded enough to invest in something "so lame , so slow , so old" . If they're opened minded for something "so lame" , imagine what they would see in BitShares if you present it well ?

The best way to achieve the success for BitShares is to grow the whole crypto and blockchain industry instead of hoping people would abandon bitcoin and come to jesus .

Like it or not , Bitcoin will grow , the blockchain industry will grow , multiple projects will grow , even the ones lamer than Bitshares , even the ones who refuse to take BitShares's technology , even the ones with 1 hour confirmation . And investors are investing in the whole industry instead of a single project now .

You have to adjust your expectations . You don't need people to sell their bitcoin and buy Bitshares . You need people to buy Bitcoin and Bitshares because they're both awesome .

And there are many ways to show how awesome something is . Making people think they're not wise enough to choose your product is not a good way . At least not a good way for a project that's suppose to gain the most network effect as possible .

Come back to the question in OP . It's not a matter of "good" or "bad" or "problems" , it's about the suitableness in specific applications . You should link the features to a specific application to sell it , such as high volume stock trading .

Imagine a world where people use Bitcoin as currency in a major way , and businessmen use BItShares to issue and trade stocks , and Bitcoin would be still slow , lame as hell . So what ? Who says that's not a win for BitShares if other project still succeed with lame features while BitShares also succeeded ?

  and that

[betax]

Strategically aligning BTS with BTC in a win-win is definitely the best strategy moving forward.

   No fights, help and enhance.

How can we help bitcoin?

Mainly store your btc as usd, and not in exchanges, and keep it save from hacking, and / or high volatility.

Requires good volume, easy exchange btc -> bitBtc -> bitusd (with very low spread) /fees.

All the technology bits (which are great, and  and required) they will be demonstrated when the platform is evaluated.

It is the same as how can we help a non-crypto user (low fees, fast and easy way to transfer money, buy shares on any bitasset, etc)

[liondani]

为什么花了一年时间从0.34跌到0.034都不能让你这个傻逼意识到比特币有什么问题都不关你屁事对比比特币有个鸡巴卵用有个鸟人会对你解决了比特币什么问题感兴趣吗真是傻逼操

Stan就是个无药可救的傻屌，big thing，big到连他老母都被套了。
比特币有问题，你比特股何尝没有问题，非得需要靠埋汰别人踩着别人上吗？
就这点来说，我觉得cnx这群技术宅仍然太幼稚。
比特股还有很长的路要走啊。
Stan和BM啊,你们两父子别因为最近涨了那么一丢丢就觉得好像全世界都没你们牛掰一样啊。

from google translate...

Why did it take a year fell to 0.034 from 0.34 this sucker does not make you realize what the problem is not bitcoin none of your business compare bitcoins have a dick egg with a bird who would you have solved what bitcoins it is really a sucker speak of issues of interest

Stan is a hopeless silly cock, big thing, big to even his mother are quilt.
Bitcoin there is a problem, why do not you share a bit problem, we have to rely on Mai Tai someone stepping on others?
On this point, I think cnx house these technologies are still too naive.
Bit stocks still have a long way to go ah.
Stan and BM ah, you two father and son do not because of the recent rise so a Diudiu did you feel like the world as cattle breaking ah.

[lzr1900]

为什么花了一年时间从0.34跌到0.034都不能让你这个傻逼意识到比特币有什么问题都不关你屁事对比比特币有个鸡巴卵用有个鸟人会对你解决了比特币什么问题感兴趣吗真是傻逼操

Stan就是个无药可救的傻屌，big thing，big到连他老母都被套了。
比特币有问题，你比特股何尝没有问题，非得需要靠埋汰别人踩着别人上吗？
就这点来说，我觉得cnx这群技术宅仍然太幼稚。
比特股还有很长的路要走啊。
Stan和BM啊,你们两父子别因为最近涨了那么一丢丢就觉得好像全世界都没你们牛掰一样啊。

[liondani]

[CalabiYau]

You do know that you can list a bunch of "problems" for the most advanced aircraft carrier right ?

The competitive edge of Bitcoin is the liquidity , marketcap , network effect , not technology .

You can bash bitcoin's technology all you want , but in the end you would just push away a major community that's open minded enough to invest in something "so lame , so slow , so old" . If they're opened minded for something "so lame" , imagine what they would see in BitShares if you present it well ?

The best way to achieve the success for BitShares is to grow the whole crypto and blockchain industry instead of hoping people would abandon bitcoin and come to jesus .

Like it or not , Bitcoin will grow , the blockchain industry will grow , multiple projects will grow , even the ones lamer than Bitshares , even the ones who refuse to take BitShares's technology , even the ones with 1 hour confirmation . And investors are investing in the whole industry instead of a single project now .

You have to adjust your expectations . You don't need people to sell their bitcoin and buy Bitshares . You need people to buy Bitcoin and Bitshares because they're both awesome .

And there are many ways to show how awesome something is . Making people think they're not wise enough to choose your product is not a good way . At least not a good way for a project that's suppose to gain the most network effect as possible .

Come back to the question in OP . It's not a matter of "good" or "bad" or "problems" , it's about the suitableness in specific applications . You should link the features to a specific application to sell it , such as high volume stock trading .

Imagine a world where people use Bitcoin as currency in a major way , and businessmen use BItShares to issue and trade stocks , and Bitcoin would be still slow , lame as hell . So what ? Who says that's not a win for BitShares if other project still succeed with lame features while BitShares also succeeded ?

  
my wavelength

[vegolino]

You do know that you can list a bunch of "problems" for the most advanced aircraft carrier right ?

The competitive edge of Bitcoin is the liquidity , marketcap , network effect , not technology .

You can bash bitcoin's technology all you want , but in the end you would just push away a major community that's open minded enough to invest in something "so lame , so slow , so old" . If they're opened minded for something "so lame" , imagine what they would see in BitShares if you present it well ?

The best way to achieve the success for BitShares is to grow the whole crypto and blockchain industry instead of hoping people would abandon bitcoin and come to jesus .

Like it or not , Bitcoin will grow , the blockchain industry will grow , multiple projects will grow , even the ones lamer than Bitshares , even the ones who refuse to take BitShares's technology , even the ones with 1 hour confirmation . And investors are investing in the whole industry instead of a single project now .

You have to adjust your expectations . You don't need people to sell their bitcoin and buy Bitshares . You need people to buy Bitcoin and Bitshares because they're both awesome .

And there are many ways to show how awesome something is . Making people think they're not wise enough to choose your product is not a good way . At least not a good way for a project that's suppose to gain the most network effect as possible .

Come back to the question in OP . It's not a matter of "good" or "bad" or "problems" , it's about the suitableness in specific applications . You should link the features to a specific application to sell it , such as high volume stock trading .

Imagine a world where people use Bitcoin as currency in a major way , and businessmen use BItShares to issue and trade stocks , and Bitcoin would be still slow , lame as hell . So what ? Who says that's not a win for BitShares if other project still succeed with lame features while BitShares also succeeded ?

  I like this kind of thinking

I really do too. i hope everyone currently involved in the crypto experiment can re-align and benefit together. Competition has fostered some incredible innovation but we need to focus on partnerships and working together wherever possible.

 

[Method-X]

Strategically aligning BTS with BTC in a win-win is definitely the best strategy moving forward.

[Ben Mason]

You do know that you can list a bunch of "problems" for the most advanced aircraft carrier right ?

The competitive edge of Bitcoin is the liquidity , marketcap , network effect , not technology .

You can bash bitcoin's technology all you want , but in the end you would just push away a major community that's open minded enough to invest in something "so lame , so slow , so old" . If they're opened minded for something "so lame" , imagine what they would see in BitShares if you present it well ?

The best way to achieve the success for BitShares is to grow the whole crypto and blockchain industry instead of hoping people would abandon bitcoin and come to jesus .

Like it or not , Bitcoin will grow , the blockchain industry will grow , multiple projects will grow , even the ones lamer than Bitshares , even the ones who refuse to take BitShares's technology , even the ones with 1 hour confirmation . And investors are investing in the whole industry instead of a single project now .

You have to adjust your expectations . You don't need people to sell their bitcoin and buy Bitshares . You need people to buy Bitcoin and Bitshares because they're both awesome .

And there are many ways to show how awesome something is . Making people think they're not wise enough to choose your product is not a good way . At least not a good way for a project that's suppose to gain the most network effect as possible .

Come back to the question in OP . It's not a matter of "good" or "bad" or "problems" , it's about the suitableness in specific applications . You should link the features to a specific application to sell it , such as high volume stock trading .

Imagine a world where people use Bitcoin as currency in a major way , and businessmen use BItShares to issue and trade stocks , and Bitcoin would be still slow , lame as hell . So what ? Who says that's not a win for BitShares if other project still succeed with lame features while BitShares also succeeded ?

  I like this kind of thinking

I really do too. i hope everyone currently involved in the crypto experiment can re-align and benefit together. Competition has fostered some incredible innovation but we need to focus on partnerships and working together wherever possible.

[Musewhale]

You do know that you can list a bunch of "problems" for the most advanced aircraft carrier right ?

The competitive edge of Bitcoin is the liquidity , marketcap , network effect , not technology .

You can bash bitcoin's technology all you want , but in the end you would just push away a major community that's open minded enough to invest in something "so lame , so slow , so old" . If they're opened minded for something "so lame" , imagine what they would see in BitShares if you present it well ?

The best way to achieve the success for BitShares is to grow the whole crypto and blockchain industry instead of hoping people would abandon bitcoin and come to jesus .

Like it or not , Bitcoin will grow , the blockchain industry will grow , multiple projects will grow , even the ones lamer than Bitshares , even the ones who refuse to take BitShares's technology , even the ones with 1 hour confirmation . And investors are investing in the whole industry instead of a single project now .

You have to adjust your expectations . You don't need people to sell their bitcoin and buy Bitshares . You need people to buy Bitcoin and Bitshares because they're both awesome .

And there are many ways to show how awesome something is . Making people think they're not wise enough to choose your product is not a good way . At least not a good way for a project that's suppose to gain the most network effect as possible .

Come back to the question in OP . It's not a matter of "good" or "bad" or "problems" , it's about the suitableness in specific applications . You should link the features to a specific application to sell it , such as high volume stock trading .

Imagine a world where people use Bitcoin as currency in a major way , and businessmen use BItShares to issue and trade stocks , and Bitcoin would be still slow , lame as hell . So what ? Who says that's not a win for BitShares if other project still succeed with lame features while BitShares also succeeded ?

  I like this kind of thinking

[btswildpig]

You do know that you can list a bunch of "problems" for the most advanced aircraft carrier right ?

The competitive edge of Bitcoin is the liquidity , marketcap , network effect , not technology .

You can bash bitcoin's technology all you want , but in the end you would just push away a major community that's open minded enough to invest in something "so lame , so slow , so old" . If they're opened minded for something "so lame" , imagine what they would see in BitShares if you present it well ?

The best way to achieve the success for BitShares is to grow the whole crypto and blockchain industry instead of hoping people would abandon bitcoin and come to jesus .

Like it or not , Bitcoin will grow , the blockchain industry will grow , multiple projects will grow , even the ones lamer than Bitshares , even the ones who refuse to take BitShares's technology , even the ones with 1 hour confirmation . And investors are investing in the whole industry instead of a single project now .

You have to adjust your expectations . You don't need people to sell their bitcoin and buy Bitshares . You need people to buy Bitcoin and Bitshares because they're both awesome .

And there are many ways to show how awesome something is . Making people think they're not wise enough to choose your product is not a good way . At least not a good way for a project that's suppose to gain the most network effect as possible .

Come back to the question in OP . It's not a matter of "good" or "bad" or "problems" , it's about the suitableness in specific applications . You should link the features to a specific application to sell it , such as high volume stock trading .

Imagine a world where people use Bitcoin as currency in a major way , and businessmen use BItShares to issue and trade stocks , and Bitcoin would be still slow , lame as hell . So what ? Who says that's not a win for BitShares if other project still succeed with lame features while BitShares also succeeded ?

[BTSdac]

btc is a great innovation ,but there are some problem , bts would make block chain become usefull