0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: delulo on September 25, 2015, 09:30:14 pmQuote from: Ander on September 25, 2015, 04:56:22 pmThats the main difference. Any bitshares clone must use an equivalent of BTS, so you cannot gain by simply removing it.Still didnt get where the difference is. Maybe you can say it differently?BTS is necessary to the way that the Bitshares blockchain works. You cannot have collateral and market pegged assets without it.It is easier to clone a version of ripple that doesnt have the XRP token in it, because the XRP token doesnt actually serve much function in the blockchain, it simply exists to make ripple labs and early adopters rich.
Quote from: Ander on September 25, 2015, 04:56:22 pmThats the main difference. Any bitshares clone must use an equivalent of BTS, so you cannot gain by simply removing it.Still didnt get where the difference is. Maybe you can say it differently?
Thats the main difference. Any bitshares clone must use an equivalent of BTS, so you cannot gain by simply removing it.
In bts you can use bitassets to pay the fee ... more precisely they are autoconverted to bts by the dex
Quote from: xeroc on September 25, 2015, 07:35:11 amI still wonder about the value people see in ETH ..The value of Ethereum is huge .. but not the value of ETH .. at least not at this point in time .. the value proposition for eth is basically the same as xrp .. IMHOYes, ETH is to the Ethereum network as XRP is to the Ripple network.
I still wonder about the value people see in ETH ..The value of Ethereum is huge .. but not the value of ETH .. at least not at this point in time .. the value proposition for eth is basically the same as xrp .. IMHO
this summer