It was said that Angel Shares are less likely to honored by other (than I3) DAC developers than PTS. Why?
Misconception. AGS was originally viewed as Invictus-specific. We are only the caretakers, the management agents by which members of the community can crowd-fund common infrastructure and the ecosystem on which other DACs can quickly build. 100% of the funds raised are recycled back into the community to fund development and promotion by the community. Once the toolkit, infrastructure and ecosystem are built
it belongs to the stakeholder community, not Invictus.So now, as a DAC developer do you want to build on top of that ecosystem without honoring those that sacrificed to build it? How do you think those PTS and AGS holders collectively would view a new DAC that dissed their contributions? Who else will understand and appreciate your new DAC if you alienate them?
Would you rather build your own ecosystem and come up with the money to do that all over again independently? Why? To save 20% that would otherwise be given away in mining lotteries in an attempt to attract attention from somehow knowledgable non-stakeholders?
These are question every developer must ask. What do you think the wisest will choose?